West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Don Jacob on February 08, 2007, 08:28:32 PM
-
-IN A STUNNING 'UPSET' , NUMBER 11. STEVE YOUNG COMES IN AT THE LAST MINUTE TO BEAT NUMBER 2. TOM BRADY
-WHILE BRETT FAVRE CONTINUES TO RIP THROUGHT THE COMPETITION
-NO.1 JOE MONTANA EARNS AUTOMACTIC NEXT ROUND BYE WITH HIS DEFEAT OF TROY AIKMAN. WHY A BYE IN THE 3RD ROUND? BECAUSE I SAID SO ;)
YOU KNOW THE DRILL! GET TO CRACKIN AND MAKE IT HAPPEN PEOPLE
-
No Brady? I dont know if the voting should continue :-X
I vote Steve Young
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
not always, what about that CRAP he threw up against the eagles? He won 1 superbowl! Hes not a god. "This is brett Favre were talking about" Thats funny.
-
young in prime>favre in prime
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
not always, what about that CRAP he threw up against the eagles? He won 1 superbowl! Hes not a god. "This is brett Favre were talking about" Thats funny.
I meant count on him to be playing all season. I didn't think we were picking top QB for one game scenarios, but who'd you want long term to build a team. I'll take BRet over Steve anyday of the week, even in just 1 game scenarios. Young is more likely to get hurt and that's the main difference maker for me.
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
not always, what about that CRAP he threw up against the eagles? He won 1 superbowl! Hes not a god. "This is brett Favre were talking about" Thats funny.
I meant count on him to be playing all season. I didn't think we were picking top QB for one game scenarios, but who'd you want long term to build a team. I'll take BRet over Steve anyday of the week, even in just 1 game scenarios. Young is more likely to get hurt and that's the main difference maker for me.
injuries aside id take Steve Young
-
If both are healthy and in their prime, I take Steve
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
not always, what about that CRAP he threw up against the eagles? He won 1 superbowl! Hes not a god. "This is brett Favre were talking about" Thats funny.
I meant count on him to be playing all season. I didn't think we were picking top QB for one game scenarios, but who'd you want long term to build a team. I'll take BRet over Steve anyday of the week, even in just 1 game scenarios. Young is more likely to get hurt and that's the main difference maker for me.
injuries aside id take Steve Young
I guess that would mean you'd easily take Brady over Favre. Keep in mind that if Dallas didn't exist Favre could have had another 2 Superbowls. He was a great QB on a great team but he had two of hte toughest teams ever to go through in the playoffs and rarely got home advantage. I think the key factor in the difference between Green Bay going in Favre's early years and NE going was home advantage because of the weather conditions. For either Dallas or SF to walk into Green Bay in January would be as hard as it was for Indy to come into Foxboro.
If BRet Farve got to play in Lambaeu the weather itself would have taken care of the Cowboys and the Niners in my opinion. And then it would have been simple math against Buffalo, SD and Pit. I know homefiekld isn't as big as it's made out to be but when that home is in minus degree weather it makes a big difference. Young only won one Superbowl as well. Bret did get to two. And I know the bottom line for you is wins.
-
I like Young and really pushed for him against Brady but this Bret Favre we're talking about. Better thrower and more of a Warrior. I can count on Favre. With Young I'd be worried he'd get hurt.
not always, what about that CRAP he threw up against the eagles? He won 1 superbowl! Hes not a god. "This is brett Favre were talking about" Thats funny.
I meant count on him to be playing all season. I didn't think we were picking top QB for one game scenarios, but who'd you want long term to build a team. I'll take BRet over Steve anyday of the week, even in just 1 game scenarios. Young is more likely to get hurt and that's the main difference maker for me.
injuries aside id take Steve Young
I guess that would mean you'd easily take Brady over Favre. Keep in mind that if Dallas didn't exist Favre could have had another 2 Superbowls. He was a great QB on a great team but he had two of hte toughest teams ever to go through in the playoffs and rarely got home advantage. I think the key factor in the difference between Green Bay going in Favre's early years and NE going was home advantage because of the weather conditions. For either Dallas or SF to walk into Green Bay in January would be as hard as it was for Indy to come into Foxboro.
If BRet Farve got to play in Lambaeu the weather itself would have taken care of the Cowboys and the Niners in my opinion. And then it would have been simple math against Buffalo, SD and Pit. I know homefiekld isn't as big as it's made out to be but when that home is in minus degree weather it makes a big difference. Young only won one Superbowl as well. Bret did get to two. And I know the bottom line for you is wins.
real spit. The same thing can be said about Steve Young. And youre right the Packers in the 90's HF advantage was DISGUSTING, they were UNBEATABLE. I agree the HF would have been enough to beat Dallas and SF.
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
are u serious?
-
Favre was good, but this is Steve Young we're talking about.
-
Favre was good, but this is Steve Young we're talking about.
real spit
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Exactly.
Brett Favre = Ironman
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Exactly.
Brett Favre = Ironman
ironman doesnt equal better
Montana got hurt plenty but give me him over Brett Favre anyday
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Exactly.
Brett Favre = Ironman
ironman doesnt equal better
Montana got hurt plenty but give me him over Brett Favre anyday
I'd choose Montana aswell...but this is Steve Young were talkin about here ;D
Point is..I got Favre ahead of Young in my "Top 10" list...so why would I vote against him?
-
young was good
BUT THIS IS BRETT FAVRE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Exactly.
Brett Favre = Ironman
ironman doesnt equal better
Montana got hurt plenty but give me him over Brett Favre anyday
I'd choose Montana aswell...but this is Steve Young were talkin about here ;D
Point is..I got Favre ahead of Young in my "Top 10" list...so why would I vote against him?
I never said u should vote against him..