West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: GunMaster G-9 on July 28, 2007, 05:39:53 PM

Title: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: GunMaster G-9 on July 28, 2007, 05:39:53 PM
Which album do you prefer from Dr Dre?
It is a tough choice for me. Both def classics.
But I go with 2001.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: You Ain't Shit on July 28, 2007, 05:42:56 PM
original thread ::)
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: .:Hercy Buggz:. on July 28, 2007, 06:25:41 PM
Different Time..Different Era, Different sound, but since im going with Chronic , kids will probably enjoy 2001 more though
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: K.Dub on July 28, 2007, 06:52:01 PM
 :sleep:
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: StevenQBosell on July 28, 2007, 06:53:48 PM
Chrondo 1992
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Eiht_s Biggest Fan on July 28, 2007, 06:56:51 PM
1st of all this is a ridiculous poll and second at this point it made me ill to see that 2001 had 2 votes at this point. are you kidding me? chronic is the definition of classic period.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: GunMaster G-9 on July 28, 2007, 07:34:26 PM
yeh both different perioids... but which do you like better? not a hard question to answer.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: MontrealCity's Most on July 28, 2007, 09:04:51 PM
chronic
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Fatdodger on July 28, 2007, 09:48:17 PM
2001 For Me
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Darksider on July 28, 2007, 09:50:02 PM
chronic
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: MediumL on July 29, 2007, 02:27:13 AM
2001 defined the sound for the new millenium so you can't knock people that may have grown up on music influenced by 2001 for voting for 2001. Imo both albums are very good but Chornic has better tracks overall.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Shango on July 29, 2007, 02:30:57 AM
Chronic
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Lazar on July 29, 2007, 03:12:23 AM
"The Chronic"
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: BritneySpears on July 29, 2007, 02:44:42 PM
original thread ::)

Almost as original as a Dr. Dre vs. DJ Quik thread, lol
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Lunatic on July 29, 2007, 02:50:41 PM
can't choose
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: GunMaster G-9 on July 29, 2007, 04:12:01 PM
original thread ::)

least i am trying...
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: K.Dub on July 29, 2007, 09:27:59 PM
original thread ::)

least i am trying...

yeah, but this kinda thread has been made 1000 times
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Okka on July 29, 2007, 10:48:49 PM
voted: The Chronic
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: AnybodyKilla on July 30, 2007, 01:08:22 AM
Cant really choose, thats what i picked. But if it were a life and death situation LOL, id have to say 2001 cause thats near the time i started listening to rap and hip hop!!!
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: greko on July 30, 2007, 03:49:57 AM
voted: The Chronic
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: GunMaster G-9 on July 30, 2007, 04:17:25 AM
original thread ::)

least i am trying...

yeah, but this kinda thread has been made 1000 times

sorry i hadnt seen it before..
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Westcoastfanatic on July 30, 2007, 04:52:35 AM
90% of "The Chronic" is flawless.
50% of "2001" is flawless. And the cover sucks too.

Winner : THE CHRONIC.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: K.Dub on July 30, 2007, 05:18:27 AM
Cant really choose, thats what i picked. But if it were a life and death situation LOL, id have to say 2001 cause thats near the time i started listening to rap and hip hop!!!

So u listen to both rap and hip hop ?
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: ai002h on July 30, 2007, 05:21:25 AM
EASILY The Chronic. 2001 is a great album, but it isnt a top tier classic like Chronic, AMW. DC. Doggystyle etc...2001 isnt even better than Bow Down or Dogg Food, but thats not an insult to 2001..just that people sometimes get carried away because its a Dre album.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: TRG on July 30, 2007, 05:31:09 AM
me being 17 i didnt really get into hip hop til bout 2000-2001, and the first hip hop album i bought was "2001" so thats my favourite outta the two, but they are both top notch stuff.

if i had to pick one, i take 2001 n steal The Chronic so i had both lol
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: es-jay on July 30, 2007, 05:58:45 AM
2001 isnt even better than Bow Down or Dogg Food

lmao...
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: ai002h on July 30, 2007, 06:33:30 AM
2001 isnt even better than Bow Down or Dogg Food

lmao...


lol..some people worship the ground Dre works on..lmao at you if you think those albums aren't worthy of being compared to 2001

Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: es-jay on July 30, 2007, 06:46:19 AM
in my opinion 2001 is a musical masterpiece, Dre once again re-defined the sound of hiphop. it is a true classic. i aint saying Dogg Food or Bow Down are shit albums. they are GREAT albums, however they aint a classic like 2001 is.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: ai002h on July 30, 2007, 06:49:42 AM
in my opinion 2001 is a musical masterpiece, Dre once again re-defined the sound of hiphop. it is a true classic. i aint saying Dogg Food or Bow Down are shit albums. they are GREAT albums, however they aint a classic like 2001 is.

I hear ya..the great parts of 2001 are GREAT but the album falls off after tracks 11-12 and has some filler, that has to count for something. IMO, Bow Down & Dogg Food were shorter albums with no weak tracks..maybe they dont have tracks at the level of The Watcher, Still Dre, or Whats the Difference, but they had no weak cuts either.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: es-jay on July 30, 2007, 06:54:08 AM
in my opinion 2001 is a musical masterpiece, Dre once again re-defined the sound of hiphop. it is a true classic. i aint saying Dogg Food or Bow Down are shit albums. they are GREAT albums, however they aint a classic like 2001 is.

I hear ya..the great parts of 2001 are GREAT but the album falls off after tracks 11-12 and has some filler, that has to count for something. IMO, Bow Down & Dogg Food were shorter albums with no weak tracks..maybe they dont have tracks at the level of The Watcher, Still Dre, or Whats the Difference, but they had no weak cuts either.

i dont think that 2001 has any filler, besides the skits, however the beats on em were banging. all the actually tracks are great. and i agree with you, the songs on Bow Down and Dogg Food arent at the same sort of level as some of the songs from 2001. that being said, each of the albums are good with some classic songs on them.
Title: Re: Chronic Or 2001?
Post by: Twisted Smoke on July 30, 2007, 10:09:22 AM
the original CHRONIC