West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: M Dogg™ on August 14, 2007, 03:02:27 PM

Title: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: M Dogg™ on August 14, 2007, 03:02:27 PM
Shawn Michaels owning... where else... Montreal
http://www.youtube.com/v/buPuPzJJtU8
http://www.youtube.com/v/fQuPMjZtcEg

The Rock owning Sacramento in only 3 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/v/yvIxCjBwkDA"></

Shawn Michaels owning Canada before the screw job and before his heel/DX turn
http://www.youtube.com/v/s2siZ3B1U4Y

The Rock owning Toronto
http://www.youtube.com/v/WaUwObWqxuY
http://www.youtube.com/v/iC7e0Gwr7x8

Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Paul on August 14, 2007, 03:06:18 PM
the rock is funny, i thin ther is genuine hate for hbk but
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: herpes on August 14, 2007, 03:09:58 PM
does anyone respect Canada ?
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Don Jacob on August 14, 2007, 06:31:55 PM
the rock is great


cleaveland
http://www.youtube.com/v/vPVB1COw0Gs
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: M Dogg™ on August 15, 2007, 02:01:06 PM
does anyone respect Canada ?

With all due respect to the homie Tech... NO... LOL

Dude, they cost us Universal Health Care in 1994 when Hillary was trying to get that shit through. Their low funding of it cost us. Now we Blame Canada for everything. Us not having Universal Health Care, WCW falling down, Bill Clinton's blow job, Goldberg, Eddie Guerrero's death thanks to that muthacuncker Benoit and Celine Deion, who now has Hillary's theme song and is costing us our first black president. Canada is to blame for it all.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Lunatic on August 15, 2007, 07:35:15 PM
lol...we got free health care muthafuckas ;D
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Shallow on August 15, 2007, 08:27:19 PM
I don't see what we're judging here. Are we trying to see what heel can make a certain city turn on them with ease? Because in that case both Rock and HBK will get booed like hell in those cities anyway. One guy went against Hogan and the other isn't liked by Bret. In HBK's case Toronto hated him regardless.

Or are we seeing who can insult a city in such a terrible way? I don't see how you can really insult a whole city. It can be funny at times but I never consider it a real harsh insult to generalize so many different walks of life. Toronto and Montreal don't really have an identity to insult. There are no I Heart TO t shirts being sold or worn around here?
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on August 16, 2007, 03:09:23 PM
does anyone respect Canada ?

Canadian bacon is the shit tho...or as we call it in America.....Ham.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: M Dogg™ on August 16, 2007, 08:04:42 PM
I don't see what we're judging here. Are we trying to see what heel can make a certain city turn on them with ease? Because in that case both Rock and HBK will get booed like hell in those cities anyway. One guy went against Hogan and the other isn't liked by Bret. In HBK's case Toronto hated him regardless.

Or are we seeing who can insult a city in such a terrible way? I don't see how you can really insult a whole city. It can be funny at times but I never consider it a real harsh insult to generalize so many different walks of life. Toronto and Montreal don't really have an identity to insult. There are no I Heart TO t shirts being sold or worn around here?

I take it your a MuthaCancker
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Dodgers#1 on August 17, 2007, 06:56:16 PM
The Rock
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Shallow on August 17, 2007, 08:56:16 PM
I don't see what we're judging here. Are we trying to see what heel can make a certain city turn on them with ease? Because in that case both Rock and HBK will get booed like hell in those cities anyway. One guy went against Hogan and the other isn't liked by Bret. In HBK's case Toronto hated him regardless.

Or are we seeing who can insult a city in such a terrible way? I don't see how you can really insult a whole city. It can be funny at times but I never consider it a real harsh insult to generalize so many different walks of life. Toronto and Montreal don't really have an identity to insult. There are no I Heart TO t shirts being sold or worn around here?

I take it your a MuthaCancker

Well yeah, but I don't get offended or even boo anyone that goes against. I was booing HBK when he was the baby face champ in '95/'96. Way before Bret Hart came a long. And I always liked the Rock. I just cheered for heel Hogan and booed him that night because he was against Hogan. Toronto always loved Hogan. I remember a Nitro in Toronto where the whole product sucked and Hogan was as stale as could be but he was streated like it was 1986 when he was in Toronto.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: MontrealCity's Most on August 18, 2007, 12:06:32 AM
lol...we got free health care muthafuckas ;D

youre canadian homie??
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Sikotic™ on August 18, 2007, 11:09:44 PM
The Rock owning Sacramento is my personal favorite. The reaction he got is what's missing from wrestling today.

Overall though, HBK owning Montreal every time he goes there has to be at the top. Shits classic.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: M Dogg™ on August 18, 2007, 11:15:00 PM
I don't see what we're judging here. Are we trying to see what heel can make a certain city turn on them with ease? Because in that case both Rock and HBK will get booed like hell in those cities anyway. One guy went against Hogan and the other isn't liked by Bret. In HBK's case Toronto hated him regardless.

Or are we seeing who can insult a city in such a terrible way? I don't see how you can really insult a whole city. It can be funny at times but I never consider it a real harsh insult to generalize so many different walks of life. Toronto and Montreal don't really have an identity to insult. There are no I Heart TO t shirts being sold or worn around here?

Basically who is more entertaining, and who is better at making that heat matter. I mean Rock and his Hollywood heel character singing in Sacramento that the Lakers were going to beat the Kings was just classic, especially because that video of downtown LA made gave him that edge to a city that already hates LA and anything LA. The Rock was a heel, and was getting heat, but then bam, in one song becomes the most hated man in Sacrament. So we are judging that. Both as heels get major heat, but who is better at making that heat count.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: Sikotic™ on August 18, 2007, 11:18:24 PM
I always preferred Rocky as a heel. Unlike Stone Cold or Hogan, Rock got stale real quick when he was cheered by the fans. When he was a heel, his promos were better and the storylines he was involved in were more interesting.

Most people disagree, but I like the "Hollywood" Rock better than the "Nation/Corporate" era Rock.
Title: Re: Which Wrestler is better at Owning a City
Post by: MontrealCity's Most on August 18, 2007, 11:40:53 PM
I always preferred Rocky as a heel. Unlike Stone Cold or Hogan, Rock got stale real quick when he was cheered by the fans. When he was a heel, his promos were better and the storylines he was involved in were more interesting.

Most people disagree, but I like the "Hollywood" Rock better than the "Nation/Corporate" era Rock.

yeah i def like nation/corporate rock better.