West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: S P I C E on November 24, 2008, 09:12:29 PM

Title: Tim Duncan
Post by: S P I C E on November 24, 2008, 09:12:29 PM
Is still one of the best 3 players in the league 8)
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: GangstaBoogy on November 24, 2008, 09:57:26 PM
They don't call him old reliable for nothin.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: 'EclipZe on November 25, 2008, 09:36:00 AM
he is the king of the fundamentals.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 09:48:28 AM
best PF of all time..
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: PLANT on November 25, 2008, 11:19:47 AM
fuck that
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 25, 2008, 01:30:06 PM
hes boring to watch, but he's one of the best.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 25, 2008, 03:38:36 PM
best PF of all time..


not yet
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 25, 2008, 05:36:11 PM
KG > TD
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 06:54:21 PM
best PF of all time..


not yet

2 years ago...
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 06:56:30 PM
KG > TD

wow...

Im not a Kobe fan in any way....but didnt you also say Paul Pierce was better then him? lol


Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Don Jacob on November 25, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
first and foremost


1. Tim Duncan> KG
2. Karl Malone> Barkley> Duncan


the spurs will peter out at the end of the season, especially duncan,  so i'm not really worried about them.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 25, 2008, 07:09:53 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...but Timmy's got the career KG cries about at night lol.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 07:15:58 PM
first and foremost


1. Tim Duncan> KG
2. Karl Malone> Barkley> Duncan


the spurs will peter out at the end of the season, especially duncan,  so i'm not really worried about them.

i typically hear it as

Duncan> Malone > Barkley. OCCASIONALLY an argument for Malone as #1. But not many as of the last 2 yrs. Duncan has been a more consistent all around performer then either of those two, i mean, in every aspect of the game...offensively, defensively, on the boards, setting up other teammates, winning. Malone was a high scorer, but he was being spoon-fed most of his career. He's only up there because of his points scored....i think Barkley was actually a better all around player then Malone. But Barkley did lack size, and...even though he was on some VERY good teams....he could never lead his team to a championship.  Most analysts agree, but a lotta younger fans get influenced by the type of play someones plays with rather then the quality of it.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 25, 2008, 07:17:41 PM
i hope you all know, the Spurs would not have won ANY of these recent titles without Timmy...

he is the man! ;)
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Don Jacob on November 25, 2008, 07:18:19 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...but Timmy's got the career KG cries about at night lol.


i wouldn't consider KG better than timmy right now or ever for that matter. KG is mad inconsistent, and Duncan is at least going to give you 20-10 every night. If the game is on the Line....I run the offense through DUncan waaaaaaaaaaaay before i run it through KG. then as far as leadership goes, Duncan has always been a superior leader. Kg might be more mobile, or more intense while playing, but all that doesn't add as much value as Timmy's slow and steady style.  
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 07:21:34 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...

Duncan

PPG 21.8
RPG 10.1
BPG  1.7
FG% .530

KG

PPG 16.1
RPG  8.7
BPG  1.1
FG% .508

hmm...
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Don Jacob on November 25, 2008, 07:25:40 PM
first and foremost


1. Tim Duncan> KG
2. Karl Malone> Barkley> Duncan


the spurs will peter out at the end of the season, especially duncan,  so i'm not really worried about them.

i typically hear it as

Duncan> Malone > Barkley. OCCASIONALLY an argument for Malone as #1. But not many as of the last 2 yrs. Duncan has been a more consistent all around performer then either of those two, i mean, in every aspect of the game...offensively, defensively, on the boards, setting up other teammates, winning. Malone was a high scorer, but he was being spoon-fed most of his career. He's only up there because of his points scored....i think Barkley was actually a better all around player then Malone. But Barkley did lack size, and...even though he was on some VERY good teams....he could never lead his team to a championship.  Most analysts agree, but a lotta younger fans get influenced by the type of play someones plays with rather then the quality of it.

those are valid arugments, however i don't see Duncan being in his last year playing injured and schooling the MVP of the league like Malone did in his final season with the lakers against KG. Malone had the convenience of having stockton his career, but i don't think that takes away from his legacy at all. He wasn't even a high scorer really, he gave you 18 or so and 10 in a better fundamentally sound era of basketball. I like barkley a lot more than i like Malone, however i still feel the highs of his playing are a lot better than duncans...yes he never won a championshp, but he never had David Robinson, or a cast of role player such as duncan has had either. When he did get that help (with the rockets) he was playing with players at the END of their careers. I think you put Duncan in the other two's positions and you either get the same results or lesser. I think Malone and Barkley however, excel and win more in Duncan's.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 25, 2008, 07:26:19 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...

Duncan

PPG 21.8
RPG 10.1
BPG  1.7
FG% .530

KG

PPG 16.1
RPG  8.7
BPG  1.1
FG% .508

hmm...

KG has Pierce & Allen & every other game one of the three has there game, whereas Timmy's two right hand men (Manu & Parker) are injured. so he's getting a majority of the offensive plays.

although more rebounds is surprizing to me lol.

but again, they give Leon Powe his mintues in Boston & Timmy is out there playin every minute he can...
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Don Jacob on November 25, 2008, 07:31:20 PM
even when parker and manu are in he's averaged that though.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 25, 2008, 07:31:46 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...

Duncan

PPG 21.8
RPG 10.1
BPG  1.7
FG% .530

KG

PPG 16.1
RPG  8.7
BPG  1.1
FG% .508

hmm...

KG has Pierce & Allen & every other game one of the three has there game, whereas Timmy's two right hand men (Manu & Parker) are injured. so he's getting a majority of the offensive plays.

although more rebounds is surprizing to me lol.

but again, they give Leon Powe his mintues in Boston & Timmy is out there playin every minute he can...

Having those other offensive threats could take away from his PPG...but it should help his FG% which is lower then Duncans. Duncan has been the sole threat for half of this short season so far whereas KG has had his whole team intact. Defenses have been able to completely focus on Timmy when they cant do that with KG.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 25, 2008, 07:41:56 PM
KG > TD

wow...

Im not a Kobe fan in any way....but didnt you also say Paul Pierce was better then him? lol


Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.


PP bietter than T.D.?

they arent even comparable, when was that???
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 25, 2008, 07:44:14 PM
^They're on the same level, but yes, i agree...Garnett>Duncan.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 25, 2008, 07:58:59 PM
Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.

you bet he would! 8)

KG is better than Timmy now...

Duncan

PPG 21.8
RPG 10.1
BPG  1.7
FG% .530

KG

PPG 16.1
RPG  8.7
BPG  1.1
FG% .508

hmm...

KG has Pierce & Allen & every other game one of the three has there game, whereas Timmy's two right hand men (Manu & Parker) are injured. so he's getting a majority of the offensive plays.

although more rebounds is surprizing to me lol.

but again, they give Leon Powe his mintues in Boston & Timmy is out there playin every minute he can...

Having those other offensive threats could take away from his PPG...but it should help his FG% which is lower then Duncans. Duncan has been the sole threat for half of this short season so far whereas KG has had his whole team intact. Defenses have been able to completely focus on Timmy when they cant do that with KG.

true, KG is start slow this season. should be interesting to compare the two come mid-season.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: S P I C E on November 25, 2008, 08:50:57 PM
Duncan>>>>KG  all day every day

Duncan, Barkley and Malone are the 3 best Power Fowards ever but it's hard for me to compare the 3 against each other.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: GangstaBoogy on November 25, 2008, 10:35:02 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 26, 2008, 01:58:18 AM
^They're on the same level, but yes, i agree...Garnett>Duncan.


this was last season...Garnett's digressed since then.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 26, 2008, 02:00:16 AM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: tempo2 on November 26, 2008, 04:18:30 AM
i think its a pure toss up between duncan and malone, i mean depending on what system they were in and teamates etc they were very comparable. But one thing judging from this thread is that everyone universelly agrees that duncan has had a great career and that dosent happen very often on this forum where we all agree on a player lol  ;D
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 26, 2008, 10:17:46 AM
KG > TD

wow...

Im not a Kobe fan in any way....but didnt you also say Paul Pierce was better then him? lol


Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.


PP bietter than T.D.?

they arent even comparable, when was that???

naw, i was saying didnt you say Pierce was better then Kobe?
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on November 26, 2008, 10:25:20 AM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

but couldnt win ONE with the best assist PG of all time feeding him the ball and probably one of the most efficiently run offenses ever? Youre basically saying the Jazz had the best power forward of all time, and maybe the second best PG of all time....and they were not able to win ONE? Duncan has won how many? With Tony Parker (who IS good, but he's not at John Stockton status) and Manu (who is good also, but nowhere near Stockton status).  Malone was great, dont get me wrong...but he wasnt really the leader of those teams, Stockton was.  You cant argue the fact that Duncan can EASILY create his own offense better then Malone, he's a better defender, probably equal on the boards....but Duncan has the rings on top of it. Again, Id still put Barkley above Malone.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Fuck Your Existence on November 26, 2008, 03:22:10 PM
duncan is clearly a more complete player than Malones truck drivin ass
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: S P I C E on November 26, 2008, 07:39:00 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

LMAO!  How in the hell do you figure?
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 26, 2008, 07:53:26 PM
KG > TD

wow...

Im not a Kobe fan in any way....but didnt you also say Paul Pierce was better then him? lol


Roger Rabbit would kick the shit outta Superman too.


PP bietter than T.D.?

they arent even comparable, when was that???

naw, i was saying didnt you say Pierce was better then Kobe?

if I did I was prob jok'n

PP is great, and outplayed Kobe in the finals, but even I can't say he's better than Kobe.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 26, 2008, 07:54:37 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

LMAO!  How in the hell do you figure?

considering MJ was owning shit every year of Malone's prime I think he's just talkin out his ass. 


KG > TD > KM
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 26, 2008, 07:55:27 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

but couldnt win ONE with the best assist PG of all time feeding him the ball and probably one of the most efficiently run offenses ever? Youre basically saying the Jazz had the best power forward of all time, and maybe the second best PG of all time....and they were not able to win ONE? Duncan has won how many? With Tony Parker (who IS good, but he's not at John Stockton status) and Manu (who is good also, but nowhere near Stockton status).  Malone was great, dont get me wrong...but he wasnt really the leader of those teams, Stockton was.  You cant argue the fact that Duncan can EASILY create his own offense better then Malone, he's a better defender, probably equal on the boards....but Duncan has the rings on top of it. Again, Id still put Barkley above Malone.


give tim duncan john stockton and he gets 5 titles
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:33:11 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

but couldnt win ONE with the best assist PG of all time feeding him the ball and probably one of the most efficiently run offenses ever? Youre basically saying the Jazz had the best power forward of all time, and maybe the second best PG of all time....and they were not able to win ONE? Duncan has won how many? With Tony Parker (who IS good, but he's not at John Stockton status) and Manu (who is good also, but nowhere near Stockton status).  Malone was great, dont get me wrong...but he wasnt really the leader of those teams, Stockton was.  You cant argue the fact that Duncan can EASILY create his own offense better then Malone, he's a better defender, probably equal on the boards....but Duncan has the rings on top of it. Again, Id still put Barkley above Malone.


If it wasn't for the threepeat Bulls, Malone woulda won titles...if Malone got to play in the Finals against the Knicks, the Nets, the Pistons and the Cavs, he woulda had his share of rings. You KNOW this.


Also, no way Stockton was the leader of that team over Malone, who was collecting MVPs at that time. Come on, now.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:34:44 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

LMAO!  How in the hell do you figure?


LMAO! it's called an opinion, son.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:36:03 PM
Duncan is the best PF of all time. Who's done more at the position? Who's accomplished more? The 4 rings speak loud and clear.


Malone woulda won back-to-back titles in Duncan's shoes.

but couldnt win ONE with the best assist PG of all time feeding him the ball and probably one of the most efficiently run offenses ever? Youre basically saying the Jazz had the best power forward of all time, and maybe the second best PG of all time....and they were not able to win ONE? Duncan has won how many? With Tony Parker (who IS good, but he's not at John Stockton status) and Manu (who is good also, but nowhere near Stockton status).  Malone was great, dont get me wrong...but he wasnt really the leader of those teams, Stockton was.  You cant argue the fact that Duncan can EASILY create his own offense better then Malone, he's a better defender, probably equal on the boards....but Duncan has the rings on top of it. Again, Id still put Barkley above Malone.


give tim duncan john stockton and he gets 5 titles


Tony Parker + Manu Ginobli > John Stockton. Duncan plays with 2 all-stars, Malone played with 1.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 05:39:05 PM
^  I hope you mean together as 2 they are better than Stockton

because if you think either one of them is better than Stockton was you're retarded
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:41:06 PM
^  I hope you mean together as 2 they are better than Stockton

because if you think either one of them is better than Stockton was you're retarded


I think you're retarded...becuase obviously if I put Manu + Parker, that means both of them together.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 05:42:50 PM
you've never seen "+" used as the meaning for "and" ?

don't be so sensitive, no need to attack me my brother
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:47:02 PM
^no attacks, homie...it's just pretty clear what I meant. if I wanted to say each of them were better than Stockton then I woulda put Manu>Stockton AND Parker>Stockton, which would DEFINITELY be retarded.
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 05:48:47 PM
understood, was just looking for clarification, that's all
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on November 27, 2008, 05:50:17 PM
why'd you delete your last account?
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 05:56:47 PM
Hack Wilson put me up to it
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 27, 2008, 07:38:12 PM
Hack Wilson put me up to it

who the fucc are you
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 08:17:38 PM
your worst nightmare you little fucc

go ahead and suck on that dick you're always talkin about
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 27, 2008, 08:49:55 PM
your worst nightmare you little fucc

go ahead and suck on that dick you're always talkin about

eww

thats nasty man.  why ya'll talk'n bout another mans junk???
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: Rick McCrank on November 27, 2008, 09:25:42 PM
your worst nightmare you little fucc

go ahead and suck on that dick you're always talkin about

eww

thats nasty man.  why ya'll talk'n bout another mans junk???

quit talkin about men and your junk you little fucc

suck on that junk you always yappin about bitch boy
Title: Re: Tim Duncan
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on November 28, 2008, 02:34:21 PM
you are mean :(