West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: eS El Duque on January 04, 2005, 07:42:37 PM
-
After 8 fuckin long years..Canada wins at the world juniors beating THE PUNK ASS RUSSIANS 6-1...WHOOOOOOOO!
best canadian team ever..beating every team (except for the czechs) by 6 goals or moreI don't give a fuck what you europeans say...Russia vs Canada is the BEST International rivalry.
oh canada 8)
-
;D
-
8)
-
I didn't even know the finals were today, I havent seen any of the games, but it's good that Canada won. 8)
-
I hate Canadian style hockey. I always cheer for the Russians because they play a better game. I'm a Canadian but I can't stand it when I see my fellow countrymen throw skill out the window for checking and violence. You saw the Russian frustration. In the beginning most tried their best not to get too physical but by the end they got fed up with it. My point of view started with the Summit Series of '72 when I saw a group of skilled amateurs make a allstar team of proffesionals look silly in their own country. Then Canada had to go and play like babies, using their fists and shoulders more than their sticks. They threw goons like Bobby Clarke out there only to create trouble. The only he used his stick was to take the best Russian out with a violent slash to the knee. Now the whole game is like this, even the Russians fall victim to it, and they invented the better way of playing. Strength and ignorance takes the place of skill. Canadians wonder why Hockey gets no regard inthe states and makes no real money. All the biggest crossover staers like Gretzky and Lemieux drifted as far away from rough housing as possible. Mario did it more but he was a never as big as Wayne popularity wise.
The American sports fan sees it as primitive. The point of the game is to get the puck in the net, not use force to knock people over. It works in Football because the point is to get though everyone while staying up and make it to the other side, and blatant cheap shots don't happen like they do in Hockey. If Basketball had checking it would have went nowhere. When American fans see a guy forget the puck just to see the guy hit the opposing player for good measure they look down upon it, and so do I. It scarifices the integrity of the game and throws skill out the window. If I had a nickel for every OHL player that doesn't make it to the league because he isn't big or agressive enough but has more skill than 90% of the others, I'd retire with a fortune. What the NHL owners need to do right now is pack up and leave. Start a new league with skill over strength, take away body checking, and ban wild shots (or atleast set up a n honour code), take the helmets off (except the goalie) and tone down the equipment. This would make it a more exciting fast pace game with higher scoring and highlights that have nothing to do with a guy getting a concussion or losing teeth. Only the best skilled players would qualify and we'd bring a little respect to the game I love. It's not just that I think this a better, it's that I think it would work better financially and ratings wise.
-
::in butt head's voice:: hooooooooockey uuuhh huh huhuh uhuh.lol
-
shallow you have your opinion but i think it's rediculous, now you said this right
and they invented the better way of playing. Strength and ignorance takes the place of skill
did you watch the russia u.s. semi final game, i'm guessing not because the lack of class and complete ignorence russia showed in the last find minutes of the game totally goes against everything you just said.
now as for the hitting part and russia gettting frustrated, of course they did, do you watch european hockey, they can't hit, PUSSIES...hitting is a big part of the game and always has been, now i feel sorry for you, honestly i do, i'm even gonna take it that you never played hockey because i remember back when i played if you got hit hard cleanly and got knocked on your ass you respected the guy who caught you with your head down. then you were taught the lesson to keep your head up when skating with the puck.
canada really had no cheap shots, they hit whoever had the puck, knocked their ass off the puck and got every team off their game...i honestly can't believe you're canadian talking like this, it has totally puzzled me...anyway i'm getting off topic...GO CANADA
can't wait for 2006 when we get to defend the junior title and the womens and mens olympic gold medals.
OH CANADA OUR HOME AND NATIVE LAND, peace.
-
Please don't half quote me. This is a forum not a tabloid. Here is the full quote;
Now the whole game is like this, even the Russians fall victim to it, and they invented the better way of playing.
I clearly acknoledged that the current Rusian game is no better than the Canadian one. They show signs of trying to get back to their roots but never fully can and won't because of the way the game has changed. The game is a joke now and so is the NHL. I love hockey and I played Hockey. I never minded getting hit because I'm not a whiner, but I would never hit anyone if the puck was there, because I'd go to the puck. I'd like to say that passion for the essence of the game was what made me stop but it was more about me being not good enough. There are some incredibly talented platers out there. Light years better than Domi and Tucker but they don't get a chance because they can't play this inferior style. America doesn't hate Hockey because it's Canadian, they hate it because it's a primitive sport. It needs to change for the sake of viewers and the business. Can you imagine how good a game full of guys that play like Gretzkey instead of Stevens would be?
Hockey died the second Clarke took out Kharlamov and the stupid Canadian fans didn't care that the tournament was being compromised. Of course Russia was going to lose after losing their best player. Hockey came back with Wayne Gretzky (that's only because the Russian game helped make the Canadian game better, watch 60s tapes and see how horrible the passing was) and when he was finished so was the game. This bullshit hit hit hit, no skill no skill no skill approach is the reason New Jersey has been so dominant and the reason no one watches the game. Canadians only like it this way because they are conditioned too. The fact that the US hates it gives reason Canada to love it. Well that isn't good enough for me.
I just want to make clear once again that I am not Russian and have no ties to Russia, but I will not blindly support a style of game I have no respect for. Just like I'm not Muslim and still don't support anything Bush does overseas.
-
Start a new league with skill over strength, take away body checking, and ban wild shots (or atleast set up a n honour code), take the helmets off (except the goalie) and tone down the equipment. This would make it a more exciting fast pace game with higher scoring and highlights that have nothing to do with a guy getting a concussion or losing teeth. Only the best skilled players would qualify and we'd bring a little respect to the game I love. It's not just that I think this a better, it's that I think it would work better financially and ratings wise.
Only person who'd watch that is you ;D Maybe a few in the beginning,but it wont go far. That's the problem with AMERICAN SPORTS. High numbers = good game. Whats wrong with the gritty 1-2 games int he NHL in the playoffs? THose games I LOVE. Guy's going all out toi win it for hte team, making clean hits. That's why I love hockey, NO easy way out.
It's our game, and I fuckin love it. If you change the game by taking away the red line, tag up offsides and NO-Touch icings (this would save a lot defencemen asses)..then im ok. But Radically change the game i've grown to love since i was 6..oh hell no.
It's our game. Everyone can have their style, you can like one over the other. You wanna go watch the Russian style, go to Russia (or russian TV) and watch their league games...the reason they don't hit as often as US is cause the fuckin ICE surface IS HUGE. That doesn't even help the scoring sometimes either. SO you got a boring open ice 1-1 game with no hitting...WOW! I hope this never happens in the NHL. That's why you got players like Malkin trying to dance past Canadian defencemen and they JUST PUMBLE them to the ground. Canadian/American/Swedish and Finnish players have all adapted to the hitting style. Thats why you have players like Foresberg, Bertuzzi, Hull...big guys with a lot of skill.
Oh Canada ;D
-
Nobody would watch but me? That's the current problem; nobody watches. The Stanley Cup playoffs never get any more than a couple million veiwers. As opposed to 20 millionthat watch baseball World Series, 15 that watch Basketball finals, and 30 to 40 million that watch the Superbowl. If you take the best players in the world (skill wise) put them in a safe environment with players as good, and open up the game, people who don't watch now will love it. Fans of sports in genberal will be drawn in by the talent, just like they were with Gretzky. There are guys out there who just can't do it because of the danger the games has now, and they protect themselves so much they can't perform the theatrics the common fan would love. You really don't think it could work if the game was played that way? Low scoring games aren't a problem in Football, and Soccer is the biggest sport in the world.
I respect your opinion and have no problem with you liking the hitting. Unless you cheered Clarke for hitting Kharlamov. That angered me as a Canadian fan. It showed me that we eeded to play dirty to beat a bunch of amateurs. I feel no pride from watching the Summit Series.
I wouldn't move to Russia because they play like us now, and I wouldn't be able to watch the NFL. A sport that has hitting but never glorifies uncalled for hits. If you hit a guy with the ball you get scorned, noit put on a highlight reel and praised.
-
shallow you have your opinion but i think it's rediculous, now you said this right
and they invented the better way of playing. Strength and ignorance takes the place of skill
did you watch the russia u.s. semi final game, i'm guessing not because the lack of class and complete ignorence russia showed in the last find minutes of the game totally goes against everything you just said.
now as for the hitting part and russia gettting frustrated, of course they did, do you watch european hockey, they can't hit, PUSSIES...hitting is a big part of the game and always has been, now i feel sorry for you, honestly i do, i'm even gonna take it that you never played hockey because i remember back when i played if you got hit hard cleanly and got knocked on your ass you respected the guy who caught you with your head down. then you were taught the lesson to keep your head up when skating with the puck.
canada really had no cheap shots, they hit whoever had the puck, knocked their ass off the puck and got every team off their game...i honestly can't believe you're canadian talking like this, it has totally puzzled me...anyway i'm getting off topic...GO CANADA
can't wait for 2006 when we get to defend the junior title and the womens and mens olympic gold medals.
OH CANADA OUR HOME AND NATIVE LAND, peace.
Nice post AlerG, I couldn't have said it better myself homie. And Shallow, I got NO idea what the fuck your talkin about when your goin on about canada's physical style getting the Russian's upset?. Dude OF COURSE they were frustrated,because they couldn't do anything about it and they knew they'd lose the game. Also, Canada played, and almost alyways plays clean, they go for the hit if it's there, but you won't see them slashing away or throwin spears like those Russian bitches.
-
Russia was the dirtiest team in the whole tourny so i dunno what ur talkin about...even the americans wile they were leaving the arena were tellin the canadians whatever u do just beat the russians.
-
I wasn't talking about current Russian Hockey. I was talking about original Russian Hockey. I don't like checking in Hockey, dirty or clean, because it ultimately cheapens the game. GMs start looking for big strong uys who can't play that well instead of great players who can't check that well. If the NHL had all the skilled players they don't get because they want the big checkers the league would be light years better.
-
I got my tickets for the junior's here in Vancouver..21 games..bring on the Finnish women ;D
Shallow, I've never watched the summit series, only that famous 2 minutes when Henderson scored that goal. I never saw the hit? You gotta remember in the 70's the Red Army was feared, the wholle USSR was something to be scared of. And a country like Canada, not backing down, and taking it to them..was somthing to be proud of 8)
Gretzky got hit ??? mario got hit ???..the game is the same as it was in the 80's...its just the goalie pads are bigger now and the net moved up..i think they should reduce both.
I don't care how many people watch the NHL, or the ratings and stuff. Im a fan of HOCKEY, and I love to see it. If the americans don't, want to watch the Stanley Cup Finals, thats ok. I like All-star games cause their's enver hitting, and they never take things seriousily. But with no hitting, you're going to eliminate passing..i gurantee it. All them puck handlers who don't like to pass, wont..so thats gonna get rid of role players.
I see it what you're saying, but that's gonna kill the game and ruin it.
-
8) Good for Canada, watched a bit of the game but fell asleep
-
I got my tickets for the junior's here in Vancouver..21 games..bring on the Finnish women ;D
Shallow, I've never watched the summit series, only that famous 2 minutes when Henderson scored that goal. I never saw the hit? You gotta remember in the 70's the Red Army was feared, the wholle USSR was something to be scared of. And a country like Canada, not backing down, and taking it to them..was somthing to be proud of 8)
Gretzky got hit ??? mario got hit ???..the game is the same as it was in the 80's...its just the goalie pads are bigger now and the net moved up..i think they should reduce both.
I don't care how many people watch the NHL, or the ratings and stuff. Im a fan of HOCKEY, and I love to see it. If the americans don't, want to watch the Stanley Cup Finals, thats ok. I like All-star games cause their's enver hitting, and they never take things seriousily. But with no hitting, you're going to eliminate passing..i gurantee it. All them puck handlers who don't like to pass, wont..so thats gonna get rid of role players.
I see it what you're saying, but that's gonna kill the game and ruin it.
The 70s Russians never hit until the later games of the series when they got really fed up with the bullshit. Clarke didn't hit Kharlamov, he took a homerun swing to his ankle and took him out. It was a joke of moment. Even Henderson finally came out and said he was ashamed.
I never meant to say that Gretzky never got hit, even though you weren't allowed to hit him hard. I read a story once about sa guy that hit Gretzky hard in juniors and his own coach benched him. It was a clean hit. In the NHL if you hit Gretzky you had to deal with McSorely. Well anyway, what I meant was the Gretzky would not hit. He would concentrate on the puck, the pass, and the shot.
To say the game is the same now as it was in the 80s is just plain wrong. Watch the Oilers vs the Islanders then and compare it too the Devils and Flyers now. It's all defensive traps now, and getting cruched everytime you turn your head.
You love it the way it is because you were raised that way. If you were to see the Red Army in their hey days you'd come to appreciate the art of hockey.
-
yo shallow you need to get off this clarke shit, you're making yourself sound like a broken record...since you're dick riding gretzky, what do you say to the 93 playoffs in game seven when gretzky highsticked gilmour(he also drew blood so it should've resulted in a five minute penalty and game misconduct no questions asked) for the leafs in a tied game int he third period and it wasn't called...then he later scored the game winning goal thus knocking the stanley cup favorites if they would've advanced out...was that not a cheapshot, well only gretzky knows for sure (i'm sure it wasn't anyway) but you don't hear me crying sour grapes over some shit like that...now my point is how are you gonna piss and moan over ONE play that happened well over thirty years ago like it's still relevant...another question for you shallow, what were the ratings for the stanley cup finals when gretzky played for edmonton, i bet they weren't much better than they are now if they are at all, and also you are judging from series and games played 20 years ago, it's a different game...it's adjetating agueing points you are making, expecially a fellow canadian...when the game started a hundred or so years ago there was hitting, so you're saying we should change it now because people have act like they have sand in their vaginas because of the hitting...a hard clean hit is as good if not better than scoring a goal, if you're team is down at the moment and the adrenaline isn't there that's when a guy like tucker or domi steps up and knocks a guy on their ass and it really does pick up a team...it's like an interception in a football game or or a powerful dunk in basketball...these are the guys that make it over some others who may be more talented, they don't have the CHARACTER, character is a very important thing to have in the dressing room, you ask sundin if he thinks domi or tucker is replacable he'll laugh at you for asking such an idiotic question and he isnt' from north america thus making most points you've been trying to prove irrelevant...i'm done for now, looking foward to hear more from you on this topic, good discussion by the way from two people with different opinions, peace.
-
yo shallow you need to get off this clarke shit, you're making yourself sound like a broken record...since you're dick riding gretzky, what do you say to the 93 playoffs in game seven when gretzky highsticked gilmour(he also drew blood so it should've resulted in a five minute penalty and game misconduct no questions asked) for the leafs in a tied game int he third period and it wasn't called...then he later scored the game winning goal thus knocking the stanley cup favorites if they would've advanced out...was that not a cheapshot, well only gretzky knows for sure (i'm sure it wasn't anyway) but you don't hear me crying sour grapes over some shit like that...now my point is how are you gonna piss and moan over ONE play that happened well over thirty years ago like it's still relevant...another question for you shallow, what were the ratings for the stanley cup finals when gretzky played for edmonton, i bet they weren't much better than they are now if they are at all, and also you are judging from series and games played 20 years ago, it's a different game...it's adjetating agueing points you are making, expecially a fellow canadian...when the game started a hundred or so years ago there was hitting, so you're saying we should change it now because people have act like they have sand in their vaginas because of the hitting...a hard clean hit is as good if not better than scoring a goal, if you're team is down at the moment and the adrenaline isn't there that's when a guy like tucker or domi steps up and knocks a guy on their ass and it really does pick up a team...it's like an interception in a football game or or a powerful dunk in basketball...these are the guys that make it over some others who may be more talented, they don't have the CHARACTER, character is a very important thing to have in the dressing room, you ask sundin if he thinks domi or tucker is replacable he'll laugh at you for asking such an idiotic question and he isnt' from north america thus making most points you've been trying to prove irrelevant...i'm done for now, looking foward to hear more from you on this topic, good discussion by the way from two people with different opinions, peace.
There is a difference between a spur of the moment high stick and a planned attack with the intetion of taking a player uot of the series.
As for Gretzky era numbers. It's not just TV raings in the finals. It's season averages and packed houses. In Gretzky's day the league was trying to expand at every turn. Today they're wanting to contract. People who go to Hockey in the States treat it like a second rate sport, and nothing more than an evening out. (except in some markets). I truly feel if the art of Hockey were to showcase itself to the masses the game would become better. Have you ever seen an all Russian game from the 70s and 80s?
Domi and Tucker are needed in today's game. Just like McSorley was need to protect Gretzky. However if the game had no aggression and only the skill came into play, then Domi would be playing amateur Soccer and Tucker would be working a regular job. Look at world Soccer. To make it on those teams it's all about skill. They don't look at yor ability to take down oppnents, and they don't come to see violence. Violence happens in the stands, but that's it. In hockey the highlights aren't even part of the game. I turn on Sportcentre on TSN or Espn and I see more Hockey fights being glorified than Hockey goals. The fact that Hockey is the only major North American sport that needs to showcase the fighting to attract an audience proves to me that the game needs help. THere is so much unbelivable talent out there that can do so many great things with the puck and really build an audience with that, but a few elbows, dropped gloves, and come from behind checks discourage even trying those moves. Michael Jordan would be nothing right now if the guys defending him were allowed to knock him down. What I mean by this is that if the checking and bumping were to disappear it leave so much room open for some real highlights that are truly dazzeling.
I respect your view on the sport and understand why you like it the way it is. I don't blame you. I just prefer a different style. Just because something has been a certain way for years doesn't mean change would greatly improve it. Look what the 3 point line did for basket ball. Guys didn't wear helemts in hockey until the last decade or so. They made them mandatory for safety reasons. I ask to ban intentional contact for safety reasons aswell. The difference is that my proposed change also make the game a lot more fun to watch.
-
"The difference is that my proposed change also make the game a lot more fun to watch"
for who? for the those people who never watch hockey? or those who do watch hockey?
Ask ANY REAL hockey fan..cause i doubt you are, have you even played hockey (i doubt it cause all you do is beat those millions of RPG games ;D)? Taking out hitting is...well, just plain stupid.
-
"The difference is that my proposed change also make the game a lot more fun to watch"
for who? for the those people who never watch hockey? or those who do watch hockey?
Ask ANY REAL hockey fan..cause i doubt you are, have you even played hockey (i doubt it cause all you do is beat those millions of RPG games ;D)? Taking out hitting is...well, just plain stupid.
LOL, so because I played video games as a kid I couldn't watch or play hockey too. I've already answered whether I played, and the answer was yes I used to. I used to like the hitting to until I saw the Russians play in the old world hockey games. They were so articulate and skilfull they made everyone else look stupid. Look at the Series man, it was '72 and it was the best pro players in the world, minus Bobby Hull (Orrwasn't there either but he had injuries), the Russians came into Canada and beat us 7 to 3. It's not like Canada wasn't ready, they scored 2 goals right off the bat. Then Russia scored 4 unaswered until Canada scored in the 3rd, followed by 3 Russian goals. So what happenned? Canada got humilaited in their own country and got mad. They brought out the big hits because they couldn't score the big goals. Russia still kept it close though, losing by 1 game, and it could have been a tie if game 3 had an OT. Russia was a bunch of soldiers who played for fun. Canada was a bunch of pros that played for a living. They were supposed to destroy Russia, not resort to taking out their best guy to get a win. You guys can callme a broken record all you want but if this shit happenned today where Wiemer and the Coach admitted to planning an injury on Lecavailer and won because he couldn't play the last two games, it'd have been the biggest thing since the 1919 World Series. I mean fuck, when a figure skater does it, it's a national outrage, when Bobby Clarke does it he's a hero. The bottom line is that a bunch of amateurs gave the supposive best players in the world a run for their money.
Have you ever seen the way the Russians used to play with each other? The game looks incredible.
Oh and of course I'd want to attract non hockey fans, that's how a sport grows. By attracting new fans. Otherwise you wouldn't be a fan. There aren't enough "real" fans for the owners to care about. The only market that matters in Canada is Toronto and the idiot fans here would watch 5 squirrels go up and down the ice with sticks taped to them as long as they're wearing Leafs jerseys.