It's June 14, 2024, 04:50:51 AM
Quote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 03:27:35 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:18:48 PMIf you actually WATCHED the 3peat Lakers, it's very obvious that Kobe was a HUGE reason for any success Shaq had. Kobe's having individual success without Shaq, so you can't say it's just as much the other way around. Kobe was amazing at playing the initiator as Phil Jackson had him do, and always found Shaq when he was open and in position to score 3-5 feet away from the basket...Of course, the 3peat doesn't happen without either, but it's known, a guard helps a center our more than a center helps a guard....PeACenot when the center is Shaq and gets double/tripled team only to dish out to wide open teamates... shaq WAS a bigger part of the 3peat... simple as that but without each other no 3 rings!... LMAO@Shaq was bigger...Dude, you're a mockery of a Laker fan, seriously, Shaq was a huge factor, no doubt, but there's no way he coulda' done it without Kobe, NO WAY whatsoever, I'd understand if you said it was equal, but Kobe carried Shaq through way too many games in the playoffs and finals (and I have these games taped) for people to be claiming Shaq was a bigger part of the 3peat...Only the media claimed that, so it's very obvious what your brain feeds off of...PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:18:48 PMIf you actually WATCHED the 3peat Lakers, it's very obvious that Kobe was a HUGE reason for any success Shaq had. Kobe's having individual success without Shaq, so you can't say it's just as much the other way around. Kobe was amazing at playing the initiator as Phil Jackson had him do, and always found Shaq when he was open and in position to score 3-5 feet away from the basket...Of course, the 3peat doesn't happen without either, but it's known, a guard helps a center our more than a center helps a guard....PeACenot when the center is Shaq and gets double/tripled team only to dish out to wide open teamates... shaq WAS a bigger part of the 3peat... simple as that but without each other no 3 rings!...
If you actually WATCHED the 3peat Lakers, it's very obvious that Kobe was a HUGE reason for any success Shaq had. Kobe's having individual success without Shaq, so you can't say it's just as much the other way around. Kobe was amazing at playing the initiator as Phil Jackson had him do, and always found Shaq when he was open and in position to score 3-5 feet away from the basket...Of course, the 3peat doesn't happen without either, but it's known, a guard helps a center our more than a center helps a guard....PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:33:42 PMQuote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 03:27:35 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:18:48 PMIf you actually WATCHED the 3peat Lakers, it's very obvious that Kobe was a HUGE reason for any success Shaq had. Kobe's having individual success without Shaq, so you can't say it's just as much the other way around. Kobe was amazing at playing the initiator as Phil Jackson had him do, and always found Shaq when he was open and in position to score 3-5 feet away from the basket...Of course, the 3peat doesn't happen without either, but it's known, a guard helps a center our more than a center helps a guard....PeACenot when the center is Shaq and gets double/tripled team only to dish out to wide open teamates... shaq WAS a bigger part of the 3peat... simple as that but without each other no 3 rings!... LMAO@Shaq was bigger...Dude, you're a mockery of a Laker fan, seriously, Shaq was a huge factor, no doubt, but there's no way he coulda' done it without Kobe, NO WAY whatsoever, I'd understand if you said it was equal, but Kobe carried Shaq through way too many games in the playoffs and finals (and I have these games taped) for people to be claiming Shaq was a bigger part of the 3peat...Only the media claimed that, so it's very obvious what your brain feeds off of...PeACelol read what i posted fools.... "without each other no 3 rings!..."but shaq was the bigger part its easy to see... shaq went to the finals once before kobe and has been there once after now... kobe hasnt even gotten close to that .... and shaq has 3 FINALS MVP ... simple ... shaq played a bigger role!... but without kobe they wouldnt have the 3-peat....
Quote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 04:38:15 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:33:42 PMQuote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 03:27:35 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 12, 2006, 03:18:48 PMIf you actually WATCHED the 3peat Lakers, it's very obvious that Kobe was a HUGE reason for any success Shaq had. Kobe's having individual success without Shaq, so you can't say it's just as much the other way around. Kobe was amazing at playing the initiator as Phil Jackson had him do, and always found Shaq when he was open and in position to score 3-5 feet away from the basket...Of course, the 3peat doesn't happen without either, but it's known, a guard helps a center our more than a center helps a guard....PeACenot when the center is Shaq and gets double/tripled team only to dish out to wide open teamates... shaq WAS a bigger part of the 3peat... simple as that but without each other no 3 rings!... LMAO@Shaq was bigger...Dude, you're a mockery of a Laker fan, seriously, Shaq was a huge factor, no doubt, but there's no way he coulda' done it without Kobe, NO WAY whatsoever, I'd understand if you said it was equal, but Kobe carried Shaq through way too many games in the playoffs and finals (and I have these games taped) for people to be claiming Shaq was a bigger part of the 3peat...Only the media claimed that, so it's very obvious what your brain feeds off of...PeACelol read what i posted fools.... "without each other no 3 rings!..."but shaq was the bigger part its easy to see... shaq went to the finals once before kobe and has been there once after now... kobe hasnt even gotten close to that .... and shaq has 3 FINALS MVP ... simple ... shaq played a bigger role!... but without kobe they wouldnt have the 3-peat....LOL. You're missing the point...Shaq can't win championships with superstars by his side. Only Kobe pushed him over that edge...Kobe is yet to play with another superstar, so we can't really say the same for him...Phil initiated THROUGH Kobe TO Shaq...Only, when Shaq was slacking off, Kobe was ALWAYS the one to pick it up for him...You can say 50/50, but NEVER "Shaq played a bigger role"...PeACe
Dallas held serve at home, they're role players played great behind the home crowdim lookin for miami to come out real strong in front of there home crowd gonna be a rowdy atmosphere like it was in dallas i know many of yall are doubting right now but the heat are gonna do it at home : )
Quote from: NauticaICE on June 12, 2006, 10:12:15 PMDallas held serve at home, they're role players played great behind the home crowdim lookin for miami to come out real strong in front of there home crowd gonna be a rowdy atmosphere like it was in dallas i know many of yall are doubting right now but the heat are gonna do it at home : )i expect the same i think shaq will have a HUGE if not a big game... you know what he is going to tell his team... "give me the ball"
Quote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 10:14:08 PMQuote from: NauticaICE on June 12, 2006, 10:12:15 PMDallas held serve at home, they're role players played great behind the home crowdim lookin for miami to come out real strong in front of there home crowd gonna be a rowdy atmosphere like it was in dallas i know many of yall are doubting right now but the heat are gonna do it at home : )i expect the same i think shaq will have a HUGE if not a big game... you know what he is going to tell his team... "give me the ball"LMAO. What a surprise. He's been saying that his whole career...Too bad fouling him is basically a turnover.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 13, 2006, 10:15:34 AMQuote from: E. J. Rizo on June 12, 2006, 10:14:08 PMQuote from: NauticaICE on June 12, 2006, 10:12:15 PMDallas held serve at home, they're role players played great behind the home crowdim lookin for miami to come out real strong in front of there home crowd gonna be a rowdy atmosphere like it was in dallas i know many of yall are doubting right now but the heat are gonna do it at home : )i expect the same i think shaq will have a HUGE if not a big game... you know what he is going to tell his team... "give me the ball"LMAO. What a surprise. He's been saying that his whole career...Too bad fouling him is basically a turnover.you act like he never delivered in those situations... he would tear it up... when he was in that mentality... if you feed him the ball enough good things will happen guaranteed!... either he will draw the defense or dominate the paint.....im looking for a big game from him today... and wade aswell... i say miami by 10 today