The Trevor Ariza dunk

[GangstaBoogy]

It deserves its own thread...





From LA Times:






Watch the Lakers reaction on this one:


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/1v6OIFNme6w&amp;rel=1" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/1v6OIFNme6w&amp;rel=1</a>

[Teddy Roosevelt]

It would be a crime not to put that in the sig.

[Antonio_]

http://www.dubcnn.com/connect/index.php?topic=163308.0 

[Sparegeez]

[On The Edge of Insanity]

[Maestro Minded]

thats clearly an offensive foul

[Antonio_]

thats clearly an offensive foul

If you see it with no slow motion it doesn't look so clear, man. I mean it was a though decision. But it's probably an offensive foul, yeah. Gotta be real with y'all.

[OG Hack Wilson]

is it really necessary making TWO threads for laker fans to whack off to this in? lol

i cant wait for Celtics-Lakers later this week

[Maestro Minded]

as a basketball referee, i cant see how thats not a clear charge. the defender was in position

(if the defender)

• was still, or moving sideways or backwards but not forwards, when contact occurred
• took a legal guarding position before the contact, that is, one with both feet on the floor
• was hit on the torso (as opposed to the arm or leg)
• respected the elements of time and distance
• (is outside the restriction area, nba rules)

then the offensive player was at fault and should be charged with a charging foul.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_foul

he fulfilled all premises
thats a clear charge.

[Man On The Moon]

Alls I know is you're going to owe me 40 at the end of the season.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

It would be a crime to call that facial a charge.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

Alls I know is you're going to owe me 40 at the end of the season.

What was the bet?

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

as a basketball referee, i cant see how thats not a clear charge. the defender was in position

(if the defender)

• was still, or moving sideways or backwards but not forwards, when contact occurred
• took a legal guarding position before the contact, that is, one with both feet on the floor
• was hit on the torso (as opposed to the arm or leg)
• respected the elements of time and distance
• (is outside the restriction area, nba rules)

then the offensive player was at fault and should be charged with a charging foul.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_foul

he fulfilled all premises
thats a clear charge.

You must be the worst ref ever. You can't run under a guy who's making his move to the basket. You have to be in position before he picks up his dribble.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

thats clearly an offensive foul

If you see it with no slow motion it doesn't look so clear, man. I mean it was a though decision. But it's probably an offensive foul, yeah. Gotta be real with y'all.

Wrong...Nash tried to do the same thing to Kobe. You don't run under a dunker. You'll NEVER get the call in your favor.

[Bay Area Jat]

yea i saw this dunk wit a whole bunch of cousins on christmas and we were all like oh shit that was a facial (no homo)