Author Topic: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'  (Read 654 times)

Mac 10 †

  • Hustler
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5594
  • Karma: 103
  • You'll never ever win the big one ya monkey fucks!
Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« on: January 11, 2008, 06:38:38 AM »


Parted-at-birth twins 'married'

A pair of twins who were adopted by separate families as babies got married without knowing they were brother and sister, a peer told the House of Lords.

A court annulled the British couple's union after they discovered their true relationship, Lord Alton said.

The peer - who was told of the case by a High Court judge involved - said the twins felt an "inevitable attraction".

He said the case showed how important it was for children to be able to find out about their biological parents.

Details of the of the identities of the twins involved have been kept secret, but Lord Alton said the pair did not realise they were related until after their marriage.

'Truth will out'

The former Liberal Democrat MP raised the couple's case during a House of Lords debate on the Human Fertility and Embryology Bill in December.

"They were never told that they were twins," he told the Lords.

"They met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation."

He told the BBC News website that their story raises the wider issue of the importance of strengthening the rights of children to know the identities of their biological parents.

"If you start trying to conceal someone's identity, sooner or later the truth will out," he said.

"And if you don't know you are biologically related to someone, you may become attracted to them and tragedies like this may occur."

Pam Hodgkins, chief executive officer of the charity Adults Affected by Adoption (NORCAP) said there had been previous cases of separated siblings being attracted to each other.

"We have a resistance, a very strong incest taboo where we are aware that someone is a biological relative," she said.

"But when we are unaware of that relationship, we are naturally drawn to people who are quite similar to ourselves.

'Incredibly rare'

"And of course there is unlikely to be anyone more similar to any individual than their sibling."

Mo O'Reilly, director of child placement for the British Association for Adoption and Fostering, said the situation was traumatic for the people involved, but incredibly rare.

"Thirty or 40 years ago it would have been more likely that twins be separated and, brought up without knowledge of each other," she said.

Today, however, adopted children grow up with a greater knowledge of their birth families - and organisations try to place brothers and sisters together.

If that were not possible, the siblings would still have some form of contact with each other.

"This sad case illustrates why, over the last 20-30 years, the shift to openness in adoption was so important," Ms O'Reilly added.
NO MORE WAR
 

Bedford Iz Active

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
  • Karma: 225
  • O.Gz Movements.
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2008, 06:40:55 AM »
Lol if they were going to get married, it's pretty safe to presume they've already had sex and enjoyed it.

Fuck that, fucking your bro/sister  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X

But that's some creepy shit living your life and then inevitably meeting your twin through fate in the later years without knowing she's related to you.
Boy Better Know I roll deep with the Nastiest crew, i'm P-Money but i'm O.Gz too"

 

QuietTruth

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9083
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Karma: 1181
  • Shoot 'em up bang bang, nigga die slow
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2008, 07:50:41 AM »
Oh - my - God.


That's nasty shit. :puke:
 

MANBEARPIG.

Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2008, 12:46:55 PM »
Ya'll are forgetting that they didnt know they were related.

I read before that sex between brothers and sisters does not guarantee retarded babies, I could be mistaken but whateva.

-KIDRENEGADE-
 

swangin and bangin

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2008, 01:17:11 PM »
yuck
 

Raphael

Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2008, 01:19:25 PM »
marrying your brother/sister thats some jerry springer shit :grumpy:
 

Doggystylin

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2008, 01:41:07 PM »
oh wow, that sucks, cause there is nothing they can do about the strong feelings that they had for each other, damn that is fucked the fuck up. Imagine having strong feelings for someone but having to break up with them cause they're your sister. mind boggling.
 

Elevz

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2008, 02:12:02 PM »
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2008, 02:24:31 PM »
its ashame at the amount of people who are co-signing this shit. first homosexuality is on the rise now interbreeding between siblings will be. devils will be voting on it. disgusting
 

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.

Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2008, 02:32:20 PM »
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

boy i bet your family reunion is just one big orgy huh?! lol  ;D
"...and these niggas gettin tattoo tears...industry Bloods that show fear, when the authentics are near"
 

Meho

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
  • Karma: 3523
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2008, 02:43:50 PM »
Why do all the bad things always happen to Mauzip  :'(  Keep your head up homeboy.
 

Bedford Iz Active

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
  • Karma: 225
  • O.Gz Movements.
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2008, 03:43:11 PM »
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

boy i bet your family reunion is just one big orgy huh?! lol  ;D

lmfao i was guna say something similar to that.

People who make excuses like this sound like victims to the common 'omg i didn't know she was my cousin but i fucked her' kinda people.
Boy Better Know I roll deep with the Nastiest crew, i'm P-Money but i'm O.Gz too"

 

The Purple Champ

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2008, 08:03:01 PM »
wow.
 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2008, 08:10:41 PM »
Well back in the day in europe amongst the royalty family blood line, they interbreed to keep the bloodline tight. So i can see why some on here it doesnt really turn them off at the idea.
 

swangin and bangin

  • Guest
Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2008, 10:36:39 PM »
Well back in the day in europe amongst the royalty family blood line, they interbreed to keep the bloodline tight. So i can see why some on here it doesnt really turn them off at the idea.
true shit

there blood was super fine so if they got a cut they could have bleed to death