OFFICIAL EURO 2008 THREAD

[Episcop Cruel Cvrle]

only ones who deserved to go i quaterfinals are dutch...italy OMG, that team is just lucky is one of their pagan gods that is helping them, good of cowardness and corruption LOL shame that we gotta see teams like that in quaterfinals

[Lunatic]

fucking Italy is always so lucky; Ribery gettin the injury is luck as hell for Italy and then that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

Whatever, they will NOT get passed Spain

[smegma]

what happened to Ribery?

[JMan]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

[smegma]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

I've said it before and I'll say ti again: Lunatic63 doesn't know much about soccer.

I forgive him for making comments like these


NEDERLAND GAAT KAMPIOEN WORDEN! OLE OLE OLE! WIR SIND DIE HOLLANDER!

[Lunatic]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

not necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.

Smegma: Read what i just said above

[JMan]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

not necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.

if the last defender brings down an opposing player in the box then its a straight red card son.. and with the romania / italy game penatly the ref was right not to give panucci a red because he wasnt the last defender.

[Lunatic]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

not necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.

if the last defender brings down an opposing player in the box then its a straight red card son.. and with the romania / italy game penatly the ref was right not to give panucci a red because he wasnt the last defender.

that is not necessarily a rule as you two are making it seem to be; I see as Panucci didn't get a straight red because the foul didnt warrant such a harsh punishment (the severity of the tackle) and neither did the foul today.

[Meho]

But the important thing is with France he was the last defender, so it's an automatic red card. The French players didn't complain much, so that tells you everything.

[JMan]

But the important thing is with France he was the last defender, so it's an automatic red card. The French players didn't complain much, so that tells you everything.

exactly...

[Lunatic]

I'm tryna make as many bets with my homies as possible LOL

$10.00 each I get Portugal and Spain and they get Italy and Germany

all my friends are Italian and hate Portugal (vice-versa for me ofcourse)

they some pussies if they dont take it

[JMan]

I'm tryna make as many bets with my homies as possible LOL

$10.00 each I get Portugal and Spain and they get Italy and Germany

all my friends are Italian and hate Portugal (vice-versa for me ofcourse)

they some pussies if they dont take it

i made two bets before the tournament started.. Spain or Croatia to lift the Euro, both looking good at the moment too

[smegma]

that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card

the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow

not necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.

if the last defender brings down an opposing player in the box then its a straight red card son.. and with the romania / italy game penatly the ref was right not to give panucci a red because he wasnt the last defender.

that is not necessarily a rule as you two are making it seem to be; I see as Panucci didn't get a straight red because the foul didnt warrant such a harsh punishment (the severity of the tackle) and neither did the foul today.

You try to make it seem as if the referee could even have doubted for a split second lol

[JMan]

^ so mauz, you think holland will lift the Euro then?

[smegma]

^ so mauz, you think holland will lift the Euro then?

Let's hope for the best!