It's May 31, 2024, 09:01:10 PM
the lakers are NOT "the greatest AND most glorified sports franchise GLOBALLY"...that prestige probably belongs to the yankees (although they havent done shit recently) or some soccer club in england. the manchester united claim to have 330M fans world wide
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 23, 2008, 05:10:45 PMQuote from: S P I C E on October 23, 2008, 04:58:55 PMLOL NIK, obviously all time the Lakers are better than the Spurs and that cant be debated but the last 10 years the Spurs have been a better franchise than the lakers, and you cant say the lakers are the best franchise ever in sports when they aren't even the best franchise in the history of basketball, The Celtics are, you know that NIKthreepeat>one and done every year. the recent Spurs arent even a dynasty...as for the Celtics, they're nowhere near the Lakers as a collective franchise. Lakers never had a 20 year drought ala Boston and have put together way more historic and globally recognized dynasties. id take being competitive every year for 10 years strait and winning 4 titles.....over a 3 peat and being irrelevant for the other half of the decade.
Quote from: S P I C E on October 23, 2008, 04:58:55 PMLOL NIK, obviously all time the Lakers are better than the Spurs and that cant be debated but the last 10 years the Spurs have been a better franchise than the lakers, and you cant say the lakers are the best franchise ever in sports when they aren't even the best franchise in the history of basketball, The Celtics are, you know that NIKthreepeat>one and done every year. the recent Spurs arent even a dynasty...as for the Celtics, they're nowhere near the Lakers as a collective franchise. Lakers never had a 20 year drought ala Boston and have put together way more historic and globally recognized dynasties.
LOL NIK, obviously all time the Lakers are better than the Spurs and that cant be debated but the last 10 years the Spurs have been a better franchise than the lakers, and you cant say the lakers are the best franchise ever in sports when they aren't even the best franchise in the history of basketball, The Celtics are, you know that NIK
Quote from: The Wykid Won on October 24, 2008, 03:40:07 AMthe lakers are NOT "the greatest AND most glorified sports franchise GLOBALLY"...that prestige probably belongs to the yankees (although they havent done shit recently) or some soccer club in england. the manchester united claim to have 330M fans world wide lakers aint even #1 in they own sport
Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on October 23, 2008, 06:52:13 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on October 23, 2008, 05:10:45 PMQuote from: S P I C E on October 23, 2008, 04:58:55 PMLOL NIK, obviously all time the Lakers are better than the Spurs and that cant be debated but the last 10 years the Spurs have been a better franchise than the lakers, and you cant say the lakers are the best franchise ever in sports when they aren't even the best franchise in the history of basketball, The Celtics are, you know that NIKthreepeat>one and done every year. the recent Spurs arent even a dynasty...as for the Celtics, they're nowhere near the Lakers as a collective franchise. Lakers never had a 20 year drought ala Boston and have put together way more historic and globally recognized dynasties. id take being competitive every year for 10 years strait and winning 4 titles.....over a 3 peat and being irrelevant for the other half of the decade.Lakers will end this decade with more titles, while the Spurs will end it being irrelevant in title talks...its obvious that the Kobe-Shaq era shits all over the Duncan-Parker-Ginobli era, and you can't stand it. Spurs=done.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 24, 2008, 12:02:34 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on October 23, 2008, 06:52:13 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on October 23, 2008, 05:10:45 PMQuote from: S P I C E on October 23, 2008, 04:58:55 PMLOL NIK, obviously all time the Lakers are better than the Spurs and that cant be debated but the last 10 years the Spurs have been a better franchise than the lakers, and you cant say the lakers are the best franchise ever in sports when they aren't even the best franchise in the history of basketball, The Celtics are, you know that NIKthreepeat>one and done every year. the recent Spurs arent even a dynasty...as for the Celtics, they're nowhere near the Lakers as a collective franchise. Lakers never had a 20 year drought ala Boston and have put together way more historic and globally recognized dynasties. id take being competitive every year for 10 years strait and winning 4 titles.....over a 3 peat and being irrelevant for the other half of the decade.Lakers will end this decade with more titles, while the Spurs will end it being irrelevant in title talks...its obvious that the Kobe-Shaq era shits all over the Duncan-Parker-Ginobli era, and you can't stand it. Spurs=done.The SHAQ/kobe era was great for the Lakers, no doubt. But like I said, once Shaq left....that era died and so did the Kobe Lakers. Theyve finally got a team thats good....but were irrelevent in the west for how long after Shaq left? You cant claim to be dominant for a decade when half of the decade was spent as a playoff doormat for actual contenders. The Spurs have been a constant contender every year for the last decade. The Spurs have been more consistant....the Lakers have been up and down.
the lakers will end the decade with more titles eh?thats silly because there aren't 3 years left in the decade so TYING 17 is impossible, let alone surprassing
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 24, 2008, 02:49:43 PMthe lakers will end the decade with more titles eh?thats silly because there aren't 3 years left in the decade so TYING 17 is impossible, let alone surprassingthey will end the decade with more titles than the spurs won in the past 10 years..learn how to read.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 24, 2008, 02:52:56 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 24, 2008, 02:49:43 PMthe lakers will end the decade with more titles eh?thats silly because there aren't 3 years left in the decade so TYING 17 is impossible, let alone surprassingthey will end the decade with more titles than the spurs won in the past 10 years..learn how to read.hmmwell if t hats the case, then we dont count 99-00so good luck with LA winning 2 titles the next 2 years go c's
Quote from: The Wykid Won on October 24, 2008, 03:40:07 AMthe lakers are NOT "the greatest AND most glorified sports franchise GLOBALLY"...that prestige probably belongs to the yankees (although they havent done shit recently) or some soccer club in england. the manchester united claim to have 330M fans world wide LMAO@Yankees being bigger than the Lakers GLOBALLY...and LMAO@a soccer club being bigger GLOBALLY when no one in America even gives a fuck about soccer.
'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.