It's April 27, 2024, 05:09:19 PM
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first. well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as betterbut ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first.
joe montana > steve young > dan marino
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first. well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as betterbut ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history i'd say rings count for something. there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:17:56 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first. well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as betterbut ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history i'd say rings count for something. there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. rings = team stattrent dilfer is better than dan marino or dan foutes?
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 09:06:33 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:17:56 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first. well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as betterbut ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history i'd say rings count for something. there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. rings = team stattrent dilfer is better than dan marino or dan foutes? No because he played in a different era, but Jim McMahon and Doug Williams shit on Marino and Fouts.
ive seen alot of bad teams for the jets and giantsits been awhile since an 0-6 start though....cant recall any lately
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 09:06:33 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:17:56 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PMjoe montana > steve young > dan marinoJoey is first. well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as betterbut ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history i'd say rings count for something. there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. rings = team stattrent dilfer is better than dan marino or dan foutes? speaking of Trent Dilfer, he explained it BEAUTIFULLY one SportsCenter today.it's a business that is all about winning, when you talk about coaches they are only as good as how many games they win, so QBs should be under the same light.how can half the time you guys say "it's a team sport" & the other half talk about individual accolades?FACT, Tom Brady has the most TD's in a half & the most in a single season & has 3 rings. again, FACT!every other argument in this thread is "blah blah blah IF he was there he WOULD have won blah blah blah".