Author Topic: 4 time MVP Peyton Manning! (Read 226 times)

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #15 on:** January 09, 2010, 04:45:26 PM »

^wrong, QB's don't win games.

hence, you can't be "the best" because it's a team effort to win.

OG Hack Wilson · « **Reply #16 on:** January 09, 2010, 05:24:18 PM »

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 04:45:26 PM

^wrong, QB's don't win games.

hence, you can't be "the best" because it's a team effort to win.

QB's win games more than ever now

even Sanchez was a huge part of the Jets game today....despite having 2 huge drops by WRs he had 80% passing and a 139 passer rating

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #17 on:** January 09, 2010, 05:26:36 PM »

Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 09, 2010, 05:24:18 PM

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 04:45:26 PM
^wrong, QB's don't win games.

hence, you can't be "the best" because it's a team effort to win.

QB's win games more than ever now

even Sanchez was a huge part of the Jets game today....despite having 2 huge drops by WRs he had 80% passing and a 139 passer rating

oh, i know somebody who would debate that.

Shallow · « **Reply #18 on:** January 09, 2010, 10:44:12 PM »

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 05:26:36 PM

Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 09, 2010, 05:24:18 PM
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 04:45:26 PM
^wrong, QB's don't win games.

hence, you can't be "the best" because it's a team effort to win.

QB's win games more than ever now

even Sanchez was a huge part of the Jets game today....despite having 2 huge drops by WRs he had 80% passing and a 139 passer rating

oh, i know somebody who would debate that.

Yeah, me. QB play is always a big factor in a win or loss but a QB does not win a game alone and in tonight's case Revis was just as valuable than Sanchez by completely shutting down Chad which have been a difference maker in a close game.

Shallow · « **Reply #19 on:** January 09, 2010, 11:03:46 PM »

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 04:25:30 PM

^true, because we know that the Bolts & Vikings would be successful without their starting, Pro-Bowl QB's.

You wanna argue the Bolts fine but the Vikes were 10-6 last year splitting games with Frerotte and Jackson. They can still win with no Favre.

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #20 on:** January 09, 2010, 11:12:00 PM »

Quote from: Shallow on January 09, 2010, 11:03:46 PM

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on January 09, 2010, 04:25:30 PM
^true, because we know that the Bolts & Vikings would be successful without their starting, Pro-Bowl QB's.

You wanna argue the Bolts fine but the Vikes were 10-6 last year splitting games with Frerotte and Jackson. They can still win with no Favre.

clearly valuable enough to get them a Bye Week in the playoffs.

Curtis Painter on the other hand, he was thrown in against the best defense in the NFL & then in a blizzard; i'd like to see him play in a dome vs. the 49ers & the Seahawks.