It's June 05, 2024, 01:30:52 AM
Quote from: RXL on July 27, 2004, 04:31:04 PMRead what you write before you post to save yourself from looking like a moron. 7even said "How anyone can be in favor of bombing a country that hasnt done shit and killing ppl that havent done shit is beyond me." You respond with "Al Quiada in Afghanistan didn't do shit and Saddam in Iraq didn't do shit. Cmon man, i know your not this ignorant." Al Quaida and Saddam aren't goddamn countries. If some militant group or person in the US decides to do some terrorist shit, is that justification for other countries to kill people who haven't done shit, who live in the US? Look at it this way, if someone is a murderer, you don't solve the problem by killing him AND his whole family, his neighborhood, or his whole country. Everyone knows that's ridiculous- you just go for the murderer. You're the ignorant one.I never said the whole country if you understood my post. I said AL Quiada in Afganistan. I dindt say the whole country Afganistan. I said Saddam in Iraq, I didnt say the whole country Iraq.
Read what you write before you post to save yourself from looking like a moron. 7even said "How anyone can be in favor of bombing a country that hasnt done shit and killing ppl that havent done shit is beyond me." You respond with "Al Quiada in Afghanistan didn't do shit and Saddam in Iraq didn't do shit. Cmon man, i know your not this ignorant." Al Quaida and Saddam aren't goddamn countries. If some militant group or person in the US decides to do some terrorist shit, is that justification for other countries to kill people who haven't done shit, who live in the US? Look at it this way, if someone is a murderer, you don't solve the problem by killing him AND his whole family, his neighborhood, or his whole country. Everyone knows that's ridiculous- you just go for the murderer. You're the ignorant one.
Read what you've written in response to 7even's post before, once again.
How anyone can be in favor of bombing a country that hasnt done shit and killing ppl that havent done shit is beyond me
P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.
Quote from: Antonio on July 30, 2004, 10:56:55 AMP.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.Our freedom of speech basically goes like this. We can say whatever we want, unless we are like in a theater, and yell fire causing everyone to panic, or if we are members of the press and we slander a persons name. Now, according to our freedom of speech, who is closer to breaking the U.S. idea of freedom of speech. The only way though slander is inforce is if you sue for someone slandering your name. Now Jada asking why Bush knocked down the towers, that's legit because first it's a question, and second we have the right to talk about our elected officals. After Moore's film, it became alright to ask this question, since it is ok to question our elected officals. O'Reily I guess would not have that, but if shoe was on the other foot, you're damn right he would have Clinton questioned for knocking down the towers.
Freedom of speech. What that means? Freedom of speech. It means you can write/say George Bush is a bad President. You can write/say you dont like him and his dog. You can write/say you disagree with him on something because.. That's freedom of speech. To say Bush is a retarded got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. It's a diss. And you cant say that, expecially on a public television, or in a song, or in a book, etc directed to the mass. To say that Bush killed 3,000 innocent got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. To say that Bush is a terrorist got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. You can say you like ketchup and dislike mustard, tho'. Get it str8. P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.
Whyyyy
Quote from: Antonio on July 30, 2004, 10:56:55 AMFreedom of speech. What that means? Freedom of speech. It means you can write/say George Bush is a bad President. You can write/say you dont like him and his dog. You can write/say you disagree with him on something because.. That's freedom of speech. To say Bush is a retarded got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. It's a diss. And you cant say that, expecially on a public television, or in a song, or in a book, etc directed to the mass. To say that Bush killed 3,000 innocent got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. To say that Bush is a terrorist got nothing to do with the freedom of speech. You can say you like ketchup and dislike mustard, tho'. Get it str8. P.S. I dont know how it is there in the USA, but it Italy only in the Parliament it's possible to have a 100% true freedom of speech, and you cant be sued if you say something.lol.. it's an accusion. I can accuse you of everything the fuck I want. I can sue you for everything the fuck I want. The court has to decide then. And the accusion is pretty easy to back up. It's no random talk. It's like saying why did O J Simpson kill his wife, tho he says he didnt lol. Nothing that goes beyond freedom of speech there.