« previous next »
Pages: [1]
  
Go Down

Author Topic: Xzibit On Columbia Records  (Read 441 times)

The_Kush

  • Guest
Xzibit On Columbia Records
« on: March 18, 2002, 08:08:44 PM »
In the wake of Loud Records demise, it appears as though Xzibit will now be officially a Columbia Records recording artist. X is currently working on his new album 'Man Vs Machine' which is due to drop in June.

With Loud now gone, there is no confirmed word as to whether or not the new Xzibit album will still drop in the middle of the year or if it will be delayed and pushed back until November. We'll keep you posted on any new developments.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

AxleF

Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2002, 08:30:22 PM »
Quote
In the wake of Loud Records demise, it appears as though Xzibit will now be officially a Columbia Records recording artist. X is currently working on his new album 'Man Vs Machine' which is due to drop in June.

With Loud now gone, there is no confirmed word as to whether or not the new Xzibit album will still drop in the middle of the year or if it will be delayed and pushed back until November. We'll keep you posted on any new developments.


SOURCE!!!!!  Where did you here this?  Dont post without PROOF!!!!

Ax
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

The_Kush

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2002, 08:33:58 PM »
oh,my fault.
raptism.com
CHILL HOMIE!
You are nervous????
Logged
 

AxleF

Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2002, 09:13:49 PM »
Quote
oh,my fault.
raptism.com
CHILL HOMIE!
You are nervous????



Thanks.. yea.. your right.. Im on nerves tonight.  My bad and g-lookin.

Ax
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

DJ_Jay_Deee

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2002, 09:23:53 PM »
It would be good if he signed to aftermath imagine eminem, xzibit and rakim on a dre beat = DOPE SHIT!
But we all know it would take about 5 years 4 his cd to come out, thats probably why he didn't.  8)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Head Honcho

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
  • Karma: 1
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2002, 09:47:45 PM »
Yeah but would it be possible? I mean he had a deal for a certain amount of albums with Loud, so now that columbia recs has taken over louds biz he's still commited to them
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Don Seer

Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2002, 09:51:01 PM »
didn't columbia have a big stake in loud anyways?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

West Coast Veteran

Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2002, 10:17:38 PM »
That's some tight ass news homie. Maybe he can hook up with his labelmate Nas and do a track. Columbia seems like a good label because they didn't force Nas to do a commercialised album so maybe they'll let Xzibit have creative control too.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

DJ_Jay_Deee

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2002, 10:54:51 PM »
Quote
That's some tight ass news homie. Maybe he can hook up with his labelmate Nas and do a track. Columbia seems like a good label because they didn't force Nas to do a commercialised album so maybe they'll let Xzibit have creative control too.

Good point!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

DeaDSouLjaH

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1089
  • Karma: 0
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #9 on: March 18, 2002, 10:58:02 PM »
Quote
That's some tight ass news homie. Maybe he can hook up with his labelmate Nas and do a track. Columbia seems like a good label because they didn't force Nas to do a commercialised album so maybe they'll let Xzibit have creative control too.


true
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

The_Kush

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2002, 11:09:23 PM »
Quote
That's some tight ass news homie. Maybe he can hook up with his labelmate Nas and do a track. Columbia seems like a good label because they didn't force Nas to do a commercialised album so maybe they'll let Xzibit have creative control too.


Dre is behind xzibit again on this album,the executive producer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2002, 11:10:48 PM »
Quote


Dre is behind xzibit again on this album,the executive producer.


Of course... Dre will be the executive producer for all forthcoming Xzibit albums.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

The_Kush

  • Guest
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2002, 11:52:11 PM »
Columbia is a big label,bigger than Mca or Universal.
Is a good choice,i'm sure they're able to promote xzibit like he deserves.
Logged
 

Don Seer

Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2002, 11:56:18 PM »
loud never had promotion or distribution problems
and Columbia owned them anyways.

seems like they're just streamlining things a little.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Don Rizzle

  • Capo Di Tutti Capi
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: -4
Re: Xzibit On Columbia Records
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2002, 03:38:16 AM »
universal is the biggest label they own every1 mca interscope look at their webpage fucking everyone
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 
Pages: [1]
  
Go Up
« previous next »