It's May 25, 2024, 06:52:02 AM
both the name and the cover were kinda boring
Quote from: Inmate on February 21, 2007, 10:27:04 PMboth the name and the cover were kinda boringThe leaf= CHRONIC.So the name of the album= CHRONIC 2001 = Dope name for a album.Case closed.
Quote from: K.Dub on February 22, 2007, 02:31:07 AMQuote from: RAIDE - The Dangerous Crew Movement on February 21, 2007, 11:56:47 PMThe leaf= CHRONIC.So the name of the album= CHRONIC 2001 = Dope name for a album.Case closed.Lol where did u that from???YOU SERIOUS??http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CANNABIS_(drug)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_(album)
Quote from: RAIDE - The Dangerous Crew Movement on February 21, 2007, 11:56:47 PMThe leaf= CHRONIC.So the name of the album= CHRONIC 2001 = Dope name for a album.Case closed.Lol where did u that from?
The leaf= CHRONIC.So the name of the album= CHRONIC 2001 = Dope name for a album.Case closed.
2001, sometimes referred to as Chronic 2001, Chronic 2 or Dr. Dre 2001
Ive always refered to it as The Chronic 2001.Thats what it was originally advertised as in mags like the Source
The album IS called"2001",but I HAVE always refered to it as CHRONIC 2001 for 2 reasons1)THATS WHAT IT WAS ORIGINALLY ADVERTISED AS IN MAGS LIKE THE SOURCE2)Despite the word"Chronic" being taken from the title,THE FUTURISTIC CHRONIC LEAF ON THE FRONT COVER SITS RIGHT NEXT TO THE WORDS "2001"
I disagree, I see his ideas as valid as the next man's but I do disagree I think the title is perfectly concise.and kdub, yes the official title is 2001, but it's perfectly clear dre intended to communicate 'the chronic 2001' with the title/coverand no people are not preoccupied with the aesthetics of the record more than the music, it's 7-8 years later and this discussion happens. You can be goddamn sure the music has been discussed in the course of those 7-8 years.and for the record, packaging and covers and titles are part of the artistic statement, so it's legit as fuck to discuss.-T