It's May 31, 2024, 09:02:25 PM
Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 10, 2006, 03:16:12 AMiraq would just get annexed by iranThat would be a great solution. If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
iraq would just get annexed by iran
The Saudi monarch insisted said the "real blame" for Arab woes lay with squabbling Arab rulers, who could only prevent "foreign powers from drawing the region's future" if they united.
my throat hurts, its hard to swallow, and my body feels like i got a serious ass beating.
all these arab leaders just did the whole summit because of the heat their feeling under their asses,from thier fuck ups and support for the usa ,the fact is they all suck america dick when shit gets real,
This, Olmert said, marked a "revolutionary change in outlook."
Quote from: Kassem on March 29, 2007, 12:07:05 PMall these arab leaders just did the whole summit because of the heat their feeling under their asses,from thier fuck ups and support for the usa ,the fact is they all suck america dick when shit gets real, I wish something could make you realize the implications of what you say and how you are making a mockery of Arabs.You come on here with an "Arab World" signature like being Arab is what you take pride in. Then you go and talk all kinds of shit on all the Arab leaders. Well, if Arabs are such great people that you have so much pride in them... then please tell me why don't consider one of their damn countries to be ran to your standards?Don't you realize the implications of that? All these Arab countries you think are pieces of shit, wouldn't that possibly lead a person to conclude that Arabs have continuously proven themselves to be incapable of government if what you keep sugggesting yourself is true? And then at the same time you make a mockery of yourself and have a signature showing some great racial pride in Arabs?You can't have it both ways.You appear to me like other Arabs I know who talk shit on everyone and everything and don't realize they are implicating themselves and their people as they do it. They sit around and wait for the Mehdi to come and idealize about the days of the Prophet and Sahaba.Again, you can't have it both ways. You can't talk all kinds of shit on the Ottoman Empire (like you did in previous posts) and then at the same time turn around and talk all kinds of shit on all the Arab leaders. Because, then, the only conclusion I can come up with from listening to you is that Muslims ain't shit and they shouldn't be running any damn country.If your such an Arab nationalist, then how come you don't see that these Arab governments are a reflection of you and your Arab nationalism and they fought against the Kalfiah of the Ottoman Turks in the name of Arab nationalism!I don't see any difference between you and any of these Arab nationalist leaders.Please, I really wish you realized the implications of what you suggest by your critisism. I propose that the Ottoman Empire should have been supported by the Ummah, and that if you don't support them, and you instead support Arab nationalist, then you have no right to sit around and talk shit on all these Arab governments because they are only a reflection of YOU!
1.Non of any Arab leaders today are in any way representing the true idea of Arab Nationalism,they just have it in thier charters about arab unity ,to cool off and decrease the popularity and power of the NASSERITES.2.I never said a country can't be ruled by Muslims ,and in whatever Ideal goverment i would want to live under would in no way be secular or Liberal ,and the main parts of the law would be covered by Sharia,still i won't ban alchol or hashish in the country ,just beacuse its pointless in this time ,and having a ban on anything just increases people intrest in that thing,will i force the hijab on any one ,NO ,cus living 18 years in kuwait these bans just don't work ,i have been into vieled beiduon girls (the one u can say are least influenced by western values) ,so the piont is all these veils ,bans on alchol ,forcing people to go to pray ,justmakes allah look like some kind of torturer.3.lets talk about arab leadersSaudi royal family---well saudi royal family took power by a religious movement so in no way can they be called arab nationalistmubark---this guy doesn't need any essays on him,he is simply fuckedAssad--the guy idea of arab nationalism is to have a fight with the iraqi leaders for pity differences.Saddam---same stuff invade kuwait4.so u think am waiting for al mahdi,so ur idea of doing something positive is going to the uae and trying learn arabic ,i waisted so much time waiting for all mahdi,that am graduating with an engineering degree aged 20.5.well the ottamon empire,the cared so much about other races of muslims that they created situations ---their goverment main language was turkish ,so this excludes any other race. ---most areas of study in instanbul and in turkish ,so when they started lagging off ,guess wat happens dark ages.6.the closest thing we can get to islamic nationalism is a state similar to the europe thing.
I didn't say i blindly follow a NASSER's idea. I got respect for him ,as much as i got respect for Hassan Al-Banna(Muslim Brotherhood Founder---that led to modern islamic thought,Hamas,al zawahiri),i read both thier books.
Wat i find flawed in the the Khalifat thing,are the following 1)well the common language would be arabic ,would the other races just drop their languages.2)1st off all the islamic sects well have to reconle3)wat wud the non-muslims be in the picture,2nd rate citizens.numbering more than 22 million in the arabic world alone4///how will we chose the khalifa ,and wat is a khalifa.shias would want ahl al bayit(Prophet reliatives) to rule ,making everyone elese 2nd class citizens.5///the khalifa would destroy the image of islam ,as his word would be taken as islam .good and bad ,his mistakes would be taken as islam.just like the pope ,but the pope doesn't have to worry about the dirtness of politics.
well the lawrence part a few beiduins got scamed, no fucking deal.