It's May 25, 2024, 07:25:38 AM
the documentary is very interesting though there are many mistakes in "part 1" about religion.Mostly about the roots and the words which are used
Quote from: ekmek on July 11, 2007, 02:58:47 PMthe documentary is very interesting though there are many mistakes in "part 1" about religion.Mostly about the roots and the words which are used?? explain
Quote from: LooN3y on July 11, 2007, 03:16:23 PMQuote from: ekmek on July 11, 2007, 02:58:47 PMthe documentary is very interesting though there are many mistakes in "part 1" about religion.Mostly about the roots and the words which are used?? explain Well I know that the Sun of God vs Son of God "misinterpretation" is with out a doubt bullshit. There was no word in any of the major Christian languages of the day that would confuse "sun" for "son", and even if the evil men behind the curtains knew that over 1200 years later we would speak a language that has both words sound the same it still wouldn't make a difference because the concept that Jesus was the Son, Yious, or Filius of God predate the word "son" by a very long time.Why doesn't the documentary expose how Jesus's teachings and morality were simply plagiarisms of ancient texts? Rather than just focus on the mythology of it all.
Quote from: Shallow on July 11, 2007, 04:56:28 PMQuote from: LooN3y on July 11, 2007, 03:16:23 PMQuote from: ekmek on July 11, 2007, 02:58:47 PMthe documentary is very interesting though there are many mistakes in "part 1" about religion.Mostly about the roots and the words which are used?? explain Well I know that the Sun of God vs Son of God "misinterpretation" is with out a doubt bullshit. There was no word in any of the major Christian languages of the day that would confuse "sun" for "son", and even if the evil men behind the curtains knew that over 1200 years later we would speak a language that has both words sound the same it still wouldn't make a difference because the concept that Jesus was the Son, Yious, or Filius of God predate the word "son" by a very long time.Why doesn't the documentary expose how Jesus's teachings and morality were simply plagiarisms of ancient texts? Rather than just focus on the mythology of it all.yea, but the other stuff was pretty crazy, like how the sun doesnt move for 3 days and than moves up again (like jesus rose) and than all the other gods and goddesses from other religions were born from virgin star and was born on the 25th
I only watched the 1st part and all I have to say is: Lies, Lies, Lies What is this the Da Vinci code part 2?Yet another movie designed to stop people believing in Jesus. These people are more clever though they have provided a lot more (false) information. This information is believable if you do not know anything about the topic.The people in the movie are so ignorant about Christianity and they lie so much, so many false truths and scriptures taken out of context to try and deceive many (which they probably have done)2 Peter 2:1-3 says(1) But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. (2)Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. (3) In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping. Ok here’s the truth (I didn’t make this up)Horus.Born December the 25 = false 21st December (the winter solstice)Born of a virgin = false actually one ancient Egyptian relief depicts this conception by showing his mother Isis in a falcon form, hovering over an erect phallus of a dead and prone Osiris in the UnderworldStar in the east = falseAdorned by three kings = noTeacher at twelve =trueBaptised/ministry 30 = false 12 disciples = false, he had four "disciples called the semi-divine Heru-Shemsu ("Followers of Horus"). Performed miracles = so whatMother Mary = mother MeriCrucified/Dead for three days/Resurrected = there is no proof of Horus dying until he later becomes "merged" with Re the Sun god, after which he 'dies' and is 'reborn' every single day as the sun risesEven the man says “these myths even if they are true or not” the man isn’t even sureAttis.Born of a virgin = there is no proof only a few say he was Born on December 25th = false Crucified = false he was castrated under a pine treeDead for three days = trueResurrected = false only after Jesus dies people made these claimsKrishna . Born of a virgin = falseStar in the eastPerformed miracles = so whatResurrected = the are no witnesses of his resurrection it is only found in the novel Mahabharata.Dionysus.Born of a virgin = no Zeus slept with his MotherBorn on December = his birthday is celebrated on January 6th Performed miracles = true so whatKing of kings = no only Zeus was called thatAlpha and omega = falseResurrected = no proof but it is said that he renewed himself and came back every yearMithra.Born of a virgin = no born of a rock Born on December 25th = he’s birth day is celebrated on the 25th so what12 disciples = no proofPerformed miracles = true, so whatDead for three days = falseResurrected = false (taken from The Da Vinci Code)The way truth and light = not true Sunday worship = no evidenceThe same applies to all of the other God’s. Do you see how false their information is? A lot of it is just made up/ twisted (in order to make a good documentary/movie). The only thing some of them really have in common with Jesus is that they Performed miracles (just like any other God,) like I said before “so what” . Revelation on Jesus.The is no account in the bible of Jesus begin Born on the 25th DecemberThe bible doesn’t say how many wise men visited Jesus, no where in the bible does it say that there was three of themIt is said that Jesus was Born in 6 or 5 BC not 1 AD this has always been a big misconceptionSo their claims about the stars etc do really stick.Noah and Gilgamesh.There is proof that Gilgamesh’s story was written after Noah’sMoses and Sargon .I don’t know how they could say there was plagiarism with Moses and Sargon The only similarities that these two had were:The birth was kept secretHe was placed in a reed basket (which isn’t uncommon when getting rid of a child) Covered with bitumenThe baby in the basket was set on a riverThe baby was discovered and adoptedWow the story of Moses must be false because of these similarities People please don’t let these people tell you anything on Christianity these people are ignorant liars. The bible condemns Astrology this is what God says about the wickedness of BabylonIsaiah 47:13-15 All the counsel you have received has only worn you out! Let your astrologers come forward, those stargazers who make predictions month by month, let them save you from what is coming upon you. (14) Surely they are like stubble; the fire will burn them up. They cannot even save themselves from the power of the flame. Here are no coals to warm anyone; here is no fire to sit by. (15) That is all they can do for you—these you have labored with and trafficked with since childhood. Each of them goes on in his error; there is not one that can save you.God said not even Astrologers of Magician could save them form God’s wrath and astrologer and magicians will be burnt like straw.You ever wonder why Jesus (the most influential person even, who did nothing wrong) is the Most attacked person in History, its because Jesus is the only way to God the Devil's (the ruler of this earth system) knows thisThat is why you do not see any other religious people/leaders (Krishna, Buddha and the rest) attacked (even though there is so much to criticise them about) as much as Jesus because the devil knows if he can stop you from believing that Jesus is the way, he has won if you think about it there is no reason for people to make movies like this but only for evil purposes if people are happy believing in/coming to Jesus why make a film like this to try and stop people.