It's August 25, 2025, 09:56:01 AM
Dre had 1 track with east coast artists. The rest of that compilation had his own artists.
Quote from: D~Nice on August 06, 2007, 02:06:24 PMDre had 1 track with east coast artists. The rest of that compilation had his own artists.Wasn't Shareef from the East Coast (Philly)?
Might have been but that compilation IMO was marketed more as Dre showcasing his new talent. the east/west track had more mainstream artists on it to show unity, but from what I remember about that compilation it was a majority of west coast acts.
Quote from: D~Nice on August 06, 2007, 02:25:14 PMMight have been but that compilation IMO was marketed more as Dre showcasing his new talent. the east/west track had more mainstream artists on it to show unity, but from what I remember about that compilation it was a majority of west coast acts.If you listen to the intro to the album, and really throughout the album, you'll here talk about "This is for those that's trying to split the coasts". And the album was advertised as "We Don't Set Trip, We Set Trends". The theme was that they ain't tripping about coasts anymore, they were just trying to get together and make great music.
You have a good arguement. I think if the song blew up to levels of "G Thang" or "Dre Day", you'd have a very valid arguement. But you're absolutely right that it was a very pivotal moment at that time. And sure, Pac had his 1 Nation thing going on, but Pac + BCC (which was never released, and BCC was not THAT well known at that time) doesn't touch Dre, Nas, KRS, B-Real, RBX at that point in time. 1 Nation could have been huge but the fact is that it didn't see the light of day. And the Soul Assassins stuff didn't garner that much attention. East Coast / West Coast Killaz was a great statement that needed to be made at the time. But it also came at a time when Dre was really trying to find his niche in the game again. He was hell bent at separating himself from his Death Row sound, saying gangsta rap is dead, fuckin w/ R&B a llittle bit, talking about doing "ghetto metal", doing the tango in his videos, launching a new label, etc. And the Aftermath Compilation was largely viewed as flop for Dre standards at the time. How many of those artists remained w/ him after that dropped? So while ECWCK was a great track Dre hadn't quite mastered his new sound and while the song was gettin steady rotation, people weren't going bananas for it across the board. So I'll have to disagree, but a very important song at that time.
There never was a west / east beef, that was all media bullshit. There were two big issues at the time, Suge was pissed with Puffy for his buddy getting killed at a party which he thought it was Puffys people and then started the Source Awards beef, and then there was Pac and Biggie. People who tried to make an east / west war were riding the media for some attention.
The Source's 5 Mic Albumshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Source_(magazine)#The_Source.27s_5_Mic_Albums.07UNIQ928a2c4699020ea-nowiki-00000004-QINU.071.07UNIQ928a2c4699020ea-nowiki-00000005-QINU.07The "Record Report" is special feature in the publication. Journalists would judge albums by "mics". The Source "mics" are the equivalent to a star rating. The publication uses a rating system from one to "five mics." An album that is rated at four-and-a-half or five "mics" is considered by The Source to be a superior hip hop album. The avatar used to rate the albums The Source reviews is a hand gripping a microphone. The original albums granted the coveted 5 Mics award were Ice Cube "AmeriKKKas Most Wanted", Brand Nubian "One For All", A Tribe Called Quest "People's Instinctive Travels and the Paths of Rhythm", A Tribe Called Quest "The Low End Theory", Eric B and Rakim "Let The Rhythm Hit Em", De La Soul "De La Soul is Dead" and Nas "Illmatic". Over the first ten years or so of the magazine, the heralded "five mic" rating only applied to albums that were (and have held up over time to be) universally lauded hip hop albums. The complete list of 5 mic albums is below.The Source's 5 Mic AlbumsRun-D.M.C. by Run-D.M.C.Radio by LL Cool JLicensed to Ill by The Beastie BoysRaising Hell by Run-D.M.C.Criminal Minded by Boogie Down Productions Paid in Full by Eric B. & RakimLong Live the Kane by Big Daddy KaneBy All Means Necessary by Boogie Down ProductionsStrictly Business by EPMDStraight Out the Jungle by The Jungle BrothersStraight Outta Compton by N.W.A.It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back by Public EnemyThe Great Adventures of Slick Rick by Slick RickCritical Beatdown by Ultramagnetic MCs No One Can Do It Better by The D.O.C.Grip It! On That Other Level by Geto BoysPeople's Instinctive Travels and the Paths of Rhythm by A Tribe Called Quest One For All by Brand NubianLet the Rhythm Hit 'Em by Eric B. & RakimAmeriKKKa's Most Wanted by Ice CubeBreaking Atoms by Main SourceThe Low End Theory by A Tribe Called QuestDe La Soul Is Dead by De La SoulDeath Certificate by Ice CubeThe Chronic by Dr. DreDoggystyle by Snoop Doggy DoggEnter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers) by Wu-Tang Clan Illmatic by NasReady to Die by The Notorious B.I.G.The Diary by ScarfaceThe Infamous by Mobb DeepOnly Built 4 Cuban Linx by RaekwonMe Against the World by 2PacThe Score by The FugeesReasonable Doubt by Jay-ZAll Eyez on Me by 2PacLife After Death by The Notorious B.I.G.Aquemini by OutkastThe Chronic 2001 by Dr. Dre Stillmatic by NasThe Blueprint by Jay-ZThe Fix by ScarfaceThe Naked Truth by Lil KimThereīs only 9 west coast albums on that listand 5 off them is produced by Dr.Dre.Something is wrong........
Quote from: RAIDE - CEO of The Dangerous Crew Movement on August 12, 2007, 06:36:12 PMQuote from: tha letter d on August 12, 2007, 06:23:53 PMI could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.they did an article revising some past ratingsI got The Source issue when they did it,wikipedia is on point this time.They did it once and can do it again.They should add 1/2-1 mic to every non east coast release and subtract 1/2-1 mic of every east coast release.ThaQuote from: RAIDE - CEO of The Dangerous Crew Movement on August 12, 2007, 06:36:12 PMQuote from: tha letter d on August 12, 2007, 06:23:53 PMI could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.they did an article revising some past ratingsI got The Source issue when they did it,wikipedia is on point this time.They did it once and can do it again.They should add 1/2-1 mic to every non east coast release and subtract 1/2-1 mic of every east coast release. That shit makes me laugh. I would agree with you about adding and subtracting mics and all but that would mean that what the Source says about an album matters in any way to me. Like I said I know they did that article, I just think it's wack of them to not at least stand behind their journalism (whether I think it's wrong or not) and try to rewrite it. I agree that there should be more west coast in that list (Mac Dre "Rapper Gone Bad, King Tee "Act a Fool", WC & the MAAD Circle, and many others for example) however in the long run I couldn't ever let a magazine tell me what to consider a classic, I'll let my own ears do that. And this is in no way an attack on your post, like I said I like the info, I just don't agree with it.
Quote from: tha letter d on August 12, 2007, 06:23:53 PMI could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.they did an article revising some past ratingsI got The Source issue when they did it,wikipedia is on point this time.They did it once and can do it again.They should add 1/2-1 mic to every non east coast release and subtract 1/2-1 mic of every east coast release.
I could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.