It's May 24, 2024, 09:18:50 PM
I haven't personally played Halo 3, but I played the first one a lot and never saw what was so special about it. As Halo 3 has basically been described as a slightly refined version of 1 and 2, I fail to see that my own opinion could be swayed that much. Not owning a 360, its unlikely I will ever try it out though.
Man there have been FPS out since like 2004 that kicked Halo's butt right down the alley..
QuoteI haven't personally played Halo 3, but I played the first one a lot and never saw what was so special about it. As Halo 3 has basically been described as a slightly refined version of 1 and 2, I fail to see that my own opinion could be swayed that much. Not owning a 360, its unlikely I will ever try it out though.Man there have been FPS out since like 2004 that kicked Halo's butt right down the alley.. Far Cry, Half Life 2, Fear, Doom 3, even Call of Duty or Medal of Honor, Battlefield.. and all those games are old as hell. I won't even get into more recent games like Prey, Stalker... or even the very recent ones like Bioshock, etc lol. Far Cry is from 2000-andfuckingfour. Yet it is still the best Single Mode FPS out.. (imo, graphics were insanity for the time it came out), and if you want to play multi-player, get Battlefield 1942.
Quote from: 7even is the next Iwan Karamasow on September 30, 2007, 06:47:04 PMMan there have been FPS out since like 2004 that kicked Halo's butt right down the alley.. Well, Halo came out in 2001 so if it had to wait three years to get its butt kicked, I think it's a pretty good result.
Quote from: MIC on October 01, 2007, 01:36:33 AMQuote from: 7even is the next Iwan Karamasow on September 30, 2007, 06:47:04 PMMan there have been FPS out since like 2004 that kicked Halo's butt right down the alley.. Well, Halo came out in 2001 so if it had to wait three years to get its butt kicked, I think it's a pretty good result. Some random stuff I really didn't like about Halo:*very small arsenal of weapons*voices of some aliens (the small ones) are ridiculous, annoying and whack*graphics don't suck, but they aren't special at all for its genre (especially in Halo 2 cause it had basically the same graphics lmao)*lack of gore or suspense*no physique whatsoever*no real "bosses" at the end of levels
For Halo 2 there is actually no argument, there have been sigificantly better shooters around the time it came out.
This game simply lacks atmosphere to me, too. There is no time whatsoever when you kind of "forget" that you just play a game.
Can someone pleasee tell me what is so special about Halo 3 lol? What makes it different and better then all the other shooting games on the 360?
Quote from: johnny1000 on October 04, 2007, 06:24:50 PMCan someone pleasee tell me what is so special about Halo 3 lol? What makes it different and better then all the other shooting games on the 360?There's no first-person shooter on 360 that can equal Halo 3's blend of cinematic action, adrenaline-pumping shootouts, and male- (and female)-bonding gameplay. Look beyond the gameplay and you have a rich feature set unlike anything ever delivered in a videogame. The Forge and the replay functionality raise the bar for console shooters so high, it may never be surpassed this generation. It's hard to argue against Halo 3 as the most complete game available on any console. -IGN.comThe presentation, sound, gameplay and graphics are all top notch