The November Superbowl... Pats 8-0 vs Colts 7-0

[Twentytwofifty]

At what? Head butting hs own teamates? Throwing to wide open players? Hitting pop flies to the outfield? Or snorting coke with models while his girlfrend is at home pregnant?

Hate much?  Check the stats and look at the rings, Brady is god.

The penalties weren't that bad, both pass interference calls could have been TD passes and there was contact, and the one on Moss, which I think was called right given how many push offs that guy gets away with, didn't even matter in the end.

Penalties weren't that bad?   
NE was getting calling for defensive pass interference and they weren't even touching them, proof in the replays, three times.

[Shallow]

look what happened to Payton without his best reciever he looked very average trying to ball control the whole game while soon as Brady got the 4th quarter it was the jumpoff

The fact that he even looked average against that defense with out two wideouts (even Harrison's back up got injured) and the line breaking down when it did really says a lot about how good he is.

Someone please explain to me, I'd really like to hear it, how if the QBs switched teams in that game Brady and Indy would have won. Would Tom Brady's head butts scare the NE defense so much that they'd leave Wayne and Clark open? Would Brady's "cute" eye liner make Reggie Wayne taller and more capable of catching jump balls?

You switch QBs, with no Harrison for Indy, and Manning and the Pats would have won 48 to 10. This is just another case of The Pats outplaying the Colts, as a team. Joe Montana in his prime could have been on the Colts yesterday playing against Rex Grossman and NE still would have won.
 


Knuckles; Moss was leaning on the DB pushing him back with his body and shoulder. Wayne was intentionally shouldered off course by the DB (NE has a history of that. They pretened to be looking somewhere else when they make contact) and Gonzalez was pulled on his shoulder. Watch the replay on NFL netweork this week and you'll see it. Watch with your eyes and not with your ears on what Phil Simms said.

[Snoopafly-1986]

look what happened to Payton without his best reciever he looked very average trying to ball control the whole game while soon as Brady got the 4th quarter it was the jumpoff

The fact that he even looked average against that defense with out two wideouts (even Harrison's back up got injured) and the line breaking down when it did really says a lot about how good he is.

Someone please explain to me, I'd really like to hear it, how if the QBs switched teams in that game Brady and Indy would have won. Would Tom Brady's head butts scare the NE defense so much that they'd leave Wayne and Clark open? Would Brady's "cute" eye liner make Reggie Wayne taller and more capable of catching jump balls?

You switch QBs, with no Harrison for Indy, and Manning and the Pats would have won 48 to 10. This is just another case of The Pats outplaying the Colts, as a team. Joe Montana in his prime could have been on the Colts yesterday playing against Rex Grossman and NE still would have won.
 


Knuckles; Moss was leaning on the DB pushing him back with his body and shoulder. Wayne was intentionally shouldered off course by the DB (NE has a history of that. They pretened to be looking somewhere else when they make contact) and Gonzalez was pulled on his shoulder. Watch the replay on NFL netweork this week and you'll see it. Watch with your eyes and not with your ears on what Phil Simms said.

dude why u continue to bash Brady after he styled on Manning in his own building and what's with the eyeliner and all that cute talk? just asking

[Twentytwofifty]

Knuckles; Moss was leaning on the DB pushing him back with his body and shoulder. Wayne was intentionally shouldered off course by the DB (NE has a history of that. They pretened to be looking somewhere else when they make contact) and Gonzalez was pulled on his shoulder. Watch the replay on NFL netweork this week and you'll see it. Watch with your eyes and not with your ears on what Phil Simms said.

I was at a bar watching the game, I couldn't even hear the commentators but it's good to know they weren't blind either.  I wish I could see the replays again but I don't know where I could, I don't have the NFL network and I doubt anyone would bother putting them up on Youtube.

[Shallow]

look what happened to Payton without his best reciever he looked very average trying to ball control the whole game while soon as Brady got the 4th quarter it was the jumpoff

The fact that he even looked average against that defense with out two wideouts (even Harrison's back up got injured) and the line breaking down when it did really says a lot about how good he is.

Someone please explain to me, I'd really like to hear it, how if the QBs switched teams in that game Brady and Indy would have won. Would Tom Brady's head butts scare the NE defense so much that they'd leave Wayne and Clark open? Would Brady's "cute" eye liner make Reggie Wayne taller and more capable of catching jump balls?

You switch QBs, with no Harrison for Indy, and Manning and the Pats would have won 48 to 10. This is just another case of The Pats outplaying the Colts, as a team. Joe Montana in his prime could have been on the Colts yesterday playing against Rex Grossman and NE still would have won.
 


Knuckles; Moss was leaning on the DB pushing him back with his body and shoulder. Wayne was intentionally shouldered off course by the DB (NE has a history of that. They pretened to be looking somewhere else when they make contact) and Gonzalez was pulled on his shoulder. Watch the replay on NFL netweork this week and you'll see it. Watch with your eyes and not with your ears on what Phil Simms said.

dude why u continue to bash Brady after he styled on Manning in his own building and what's with the eyeliner and all that cute talk? just asking

Because I don't like him and I didn't like him all that much from day one. I don't like the Pats. I hate Boston sport fans. I hate the Red Sox. I liked the Celts way back when but that was because of wise words from the great Bill Russel; "I'm a Celtic, not a Boston Celtic". This was in response to a reporter that asked him how he felt about Boston not embracing him despite all the championships. Bostoin people were racist then and probably still are a bit.

As a person I think what Brady did with his pregnant ex is much worse than what Michael Vick did. If I had to choose between abandoning my kid to the point where his last name is not mine or kill a bunch of pit bulls I'd kill a million pits to keep one kid. But that is all recent stuff.

As a player I think he is the most over rated QB of all time. In my opinion he has no business being mentioned with thew greats. When the pas protection breaks down and the WRS don't get open Manning becomes mediocre. Tom Brady becomes shit.

QBs in general get more credit for wins and more blames for losses than they should, always. But Manning is a more of a key in an Indy win than Brady is in an NE win. It's not hard to play west coast ball when you get 5 seconds in the pocket and your WRs and TEs are wide open. It's also not hard to throw down field and hope your WR makes the play. He was lucky enough to fall into a system that was destined to win superbowls. The first couple years the Pats were OK but caught some breaks. The next two they were a well oiled machine who could have won with Bledsoe in my opinion.

I've said it before, you can put Payton Manning on any team in the NFL and with in two years you will have a top 5 pass offense. Any team, any era. Will they that winning seasons? That's up to more than just a QB. But Manning's attention to detail and practice schedule can make any firrst round WRs and free agent TEs a better pass game than 25 other teams in the NFL. If Tom Brady had been unlucky enough to have been drafted by Buffalo and made the franchise guy they may have made it to the playoffs this year, but that's it. He's not the kind of passer you build an offense around. He's the kind of guy that fits very well into a defensvely run team with a great game plan. And that's fine but when people seem to think that it's all him when he rarely ever has to thread the needle by throwing to closely covered WRs, arely ever have to deal with a bad line breaking down all game, and rarely. Rarely ever has to deal with a defese that can't stop the run it is insanely unfair to everyone else on that team. Particularly this year. These guys could be 9-0 with Rob Johnson playing the first 9 games. Last nights game was the only time when the defesnse or O line showed any real sign of weakness. But we are dealing with a league that loves QBs and a team that wants to juice up Brady's numbers. I mean they purposely call pass plays when it is an easy run in for the RB for a TD (The Colts have scored over 100 less points than the Pats and they still double the Pats in run in TDs) and look how many TDs were way after the catch runs, but it's always briliant Brady at his finest. You won't hear me calling Manning a master because of the pass to Addai that went for a TD. The guy is an above average Hollywood playboy on an above excellent team and he outshines every other player in the media by a landslide. And I think it's all the work of his agent. When the Bills had that huge offense Thurman saw as much spotlight and Kelly and Bruce Smith was as big a star too. Seymour, Bruschi, this year Seau, Vrabel never got the exposure to respect. No one ever called that team the Bruschi Bunch. Not even Manning has his WRs ingored to the point where they take his name in some weird group.

The team is old and the time will come when NE starts to suck and then we'll see truly how great Tom Brady isn't. He's got years to play. And I predict that in 20 years we'll see Manning as the record holder in every positive QB category and Brady will be the QB that collapsed in the second half of his career, and I my be the only one that never thought he was all that he was cracked up to be from the beginning. Just a guy lucky enough to be on a team destined to win. I think if you plucked the '84 to '88 Bears out of time and put them in the year 2000 they'd have a chance of winning 5 straight Superbowls, but Jim McMahon would still be Jim McMahon. You take McMahon out and have Ditka still tun a defesnse first team with Walter Payton as the key on offense and Tom Brady would be Jim McMahon. Take the 80s Redskins and 9ers out of the 80s and put them in the 2000s and the Pats wouldn't have had one superbowl. McMahon is a mediocre QB but he would have had a few rings if Walsh's 9ers and Gibb's Skins never existed.



KNUCKLES; I'll see what I can do about getting those replays.

[eS El Duque]

IM RICH BITCH! THE UNDER AND COLTS COVERED!