It's May 25, 2024, 05:55:18 AM
Quote from: 7even on June 26, 2008, 04:02:35 PMQuote from: Eleven 2 Three on June 26, 2008, 03:24:19 PMQuote from: 7even on June 26, 2008, 03:10:35 PMI wouldn't call my partner a girlfriend in a free relationship. It would just be the person I fuck most or something. "Main bitch". Not girlfriend, let alone wife. And no, to the other part of your statement. But you can have your own opinion.Well, there's people who (say they) really love each other and who are really into each other, but they don't attach so much value to monogamy - they don't mind their partner getting some joy with someone else. What do you think all those clubs for couples are for? They can be happily married, yet getting their fuck on like they're from fraternities and sororities.I don't mind people doing whatever they think is right. That doesn't mean that I approve of any promiscuosity - not at all. People are free to fuck around, if that's what they think is right, but that doesn't mean I won't despise them for behaving in a way of which I strongly disapprove. Whatever flows your boat though...1. This is something I can't quite relate to, cause I'm not like that at all, but if it's not cheating and shit, and really as chilled out and mutual as you describe it there, then I don't have a problem with it. Maybe I should have been more explicit in my initial statement. 2. This is something we can never agree on, because I'm not down with that anarchist type of mentality at all. Do I mind people doing whatever the fuck they want? If it's something fucked up, you can bet your ass I do.Then who's to decide if something's fucked up? I say people can only do it for themselves. Who else is to set the standards, and what if the standards seem unnatural to you? Wouldn't you follow your own path, without taking other peoples hurt feelings into consideration?
Quote from: Eleven 2 Three on June 26, 2008, 03:24:19 PMQuote from: 7even on June 26, 2008, 03:10:35 PMI wouldn't call my partner a girlfriend in a free relationship. It would just be the person I fuck most or something. "Main bitch". Not girlfriend, let alone wife. And no, to the other part of your statement. But you can have your own opinion.Well, there's people who (say they) really love each other and who are really into each other, but they don't attach so much value to monogamy - they don't mind their partner getting some joy with someone else. What do you think all those clubs for couples are for? They can be happily married, yet getting their fuck on like they're from fraternities and sororities.I don't mind people doing whatever they think is right. That doesn't mean that I approve of any promiscuosity - not at all. People are free to fuck around, if that's what they think is right, but that doesn't mean I won't despise them for behaving in a way of which I strongly disapprove. Whatever flows your boat though...1. This is something I can't quite relate to, cause I'm not like that at all, but if it's not cheating and shit, and really as chilled out and mutual as you describe it there, then I don't have a problem with it. Maybe I should have been more explicit in my initial statement. 2. This is something we can never agree on, because I'm not down with that anarchist type of mentality at all. Do I mind people doing whatever the fuck they want? If it's something fucked up, you can bet your ass I do.
Quote from: 7even on June 26, 2008, 03:10:35 PMI wouldn't call my partner a girlfriend in a free relationship. It would just be the person I fuck most or something. "Main bitch". Not girlfriend, let alone wife. And no, to the other part of your statement. But you can have your own opinion.Well, there's people who (say they) really love each other and who are really into each other, but they don't attach so much value to monogamy - they don't mind their partner getting some joy with someone else. What do you think all those clubs for couples are for? They can be happily married, yet getting their fuck on like they're from fraternities and sororities.I don't mind people doing whatever they think is right. That doesn't mean that I approve of any promiscuosity - not at all. People are free to fuck around, if that's what they think is right, but that doesn't mean I won't despise them for behaving in a way of which I strongly disapprove. Whatever flows your boat though...
I wouldn't call my partner a girlfriend in a free relationship. It would just be the person I fuck most or something. "Main bitch". Not girlfriend, let alone wife. And no, to the other part of your statement. But you can have your own opinion.
And if anyone would care to elaborate, I would be very interested to hear why staying single for sexual purposes is "shallow."
Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 26, 2008, 01:48:49 PMAnd if anyone would care to elaborate, I would be very interested to hear why staying single for sexual purposes is "shallow."It's shallow because, frankly, there IS more to life, and to being with women, than just sex. If that's your attitude, then it's basically like saying sex is the only thing you think women are good for. That, I hope you would agree, really is a totally adolescent, and even misogynist, mentality. And people who do live like that don't always wind up being happy in the long run.
Well first of all, you're simply assuming someone who doesn't want to be with only one person thinks all there is to life is sex. That is seriously flawed logic and it also doesn't mean you think all a woman is good for is sex. Where are you getting these assumptions? To me, making these types of sweeping generalizations about a huge group of people is shallow.
And regarding people being happy, people who are in committed relationships often end up miserable. What is your point? People whose foundation of happiness is based squarely on their sexual habits/relationships are probably not going to be happy no matter what.
Anyone else care to explain the logic behind saying anything but monogamous committed relationships are shallow?
Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 28, 2008, 03:36:56 PMWell first of all, you're simply assuming someone who doesn't want to be with only one person thinks all there is to life is sex. That is seriously flawed logic and it also doesn't mean you think all a woman is good for is sex. Where are you getting these assumptions? To me, making these types of sweeping generalizations about a huge group of people is shallow. I don't see how it doesn't follow. I mean, that person clearly values sex more than just about anything else they could or would get out of a relationship.
And maybe nothing that comes from a relationship would appeal to the person in question. Relationships are not for everybody. Just because somebody is not interested in a relationship does not mean they are shallow. I don't follow your logic.
^^^That doesn't make sense though. How does staying single to sleep around = shallow? Is that better or worse than getting into a relationship knowing you are going to sleep around?
Quote from: Turf Hitta on July 01, 2008, 05:17:58 PM^^^That doesn't make sense though. How does staying single to sleep around = shallow? Is that better or worse than getting into a relationship knowing you are going to sleep around?You aren't making sense. Are you saying that people who get into relationships always are going to "sleep around"?
^Lol@this nigga waiting to respond until the other dude is gone