It's August 25, 2025, 04:54:22 AM
Total Members Voted: 8
^^You cant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting cast
Quote from: S P I C E on September 28, 2008, 06:07:55 PMcant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting castwhat does pitching have to do with a supporting cast? there all major leaguers in the field, they can all make the same plays
cant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting cast
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 28, 2008, 06:27:21 PMQuote from: S P I C E on September 28, 2008, 06:07:55 PMcant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting castwhat does pitching have to do with a supporting cast? there all major leaguers in the field, they can all make the same playsas far as arguing whether Tim or Johan gets it, I don't know what their supporting casts did for them because I didn't watch the Giants and Mets 162 gamesbut by supporting cast I take it Spice means both the offense and defense behind Lincecumobviously the Mets had better hitting than the Giants did this season - and no, all major leaguers aren't the same in the field and can't make the same plays on defenseif a pitcher gets a 3 run lead to work with early they're game is different than being behind and some guys (like Santana) can cruise to victory if all holds upI'm sure his argument is that Lincecum had to work harder with less offensive help and control his own game more often than the offense starting it for himI'm not saying Santana got tons of offensive help on the days he pitched, I don't know, it seems to say something as far as statistics go for LincecumI'm pretty sure the Mets fucked up some games for Santana as far as wins go, same with Lincecum....someone should post up stats comparing their run supportat the same time Tommy makes a great point as well with the bullpen... but again, the Giants bullpen wasn't shit either haha
Quote from: S P I C E on September 28, 2008, 06:07:55 PM^^You cant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting castJohan has the worst bullpen in baseball behind him.
Quote from: Tommy Fits is your hero on September 28, 2008, 06:48:42 PMQuote from: S P I C E on September 28, 2008, 06:07:55 PM^^You cant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting castJohan has the worst bullpen in baseball behind him.yeah he deserves at least 6 more wins.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on September 29, 2008, 08:26:07 PMQuote from: Tommy Fits is your hero on September 28, 2008, 06:48:42 PMQuote from: S P I C E on September 28, 2008, 06:07:55 PM^^You cant go wrong with either 2 however Lincecum has the better winning percentage and Johan has a much better supporting castJohan has the worst bullpen in baseball behind him.yeah he deserves at least 6 more wins.7 actually lol.
because of the bullpen and lack of run support lincecum should have at least another 8 or 9 wins