It's May 02, 2024, 08:44:28 PM
Quote from: Now_I_Know on February 03, 2009, 10:29:52 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 03, 2009, 09:21:01 PMOne thing I know, especially from this forum. Is that Laker fans talk the most during and before the season. Its been a while since they won a title, and yet they still have the nerve to think that their team is head and shoulders above everyone...every year. LOL funny shit. Yeah, the Lakers beat us last year. But this is the NBA and that was last year. They forget how bad we were kicking their ass during game 1 and 2. If they think a team like the Spurs couldnt beat them in a 7 game series theyre fuckin stupid. Am I saying "we'll beat them for sure". No. I didnt say shit like that even during years when we were far and away better then them, because you only make yourself look like an ass....and sometimes a complete idiot when the playoffs role around. So to think that the #2 team wouldnt stand a chance in hell against the #1 team is fuckin retarded LOLLakers>>>>>Spurs. Get over it.not according to the last 10 years
Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 03, 2009, 09:21:01 PMOne thing I know, especially from this forum. Is that Laker fans talk the most during and before the season. Its been a while since they won a title, and yet they still have the nerve to think that their team is head and shoulders above everyone...every year. LOL funny shit. Yeah, the Lakers beat us last year. But this is the NBA and that was last year. They forget how bad we were kicking their ass during game 1 and 2. If they think a team like the Spurs couldnt beat them in a 7 game series theyre fuckin stupid. Am I saying "we'll beat them for sure". No. I didnt say shit like that even during years when we were far and away better then them, because you only make yourself look like an ass....and sometimes a complete idiot when the playoffs role around. So to think that the #2 team wouldnt stand a chance in hell against the #1 team is fuckin retarded LOLLakers>>>>>Spurs. Get over it.
One thing I know, especially from this forum. Is that Laker fans talk the most during and before the season. Its been a while since they won a title, and yet they still have the nerve to think that their team is head and shoulders above everyone...every year. LOL funny shit. Yeah, the Lakers beat us last year. But this is the NBA and that was last year. They forget how bad we were kicking their ass during game 1 and 2. If they think a team like the Spurs couldnt beat them in a 7 game series theyre fuckin stupid. Am I saying "we'll beat them for sure". No. I didnt say shit like that even during years when we were far and away better then them, because you only make yourself look like an ass....and sometimes a complete idiot when the playoffs role around. So to think that the #2 team wouldnt stand a chance in hell against the #1 team is fuckin retarded LOL
Quote from: Turf Hitta on February 04, 2009, 12:55:19 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on February 03, 2009, 10:29:52 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 03, 2009, 09:21:01 PMOne thing I know, especially from this forum. Is that Laker fans talk the most during and before the season. Its been a while since they won a title, and yet they still have the nerve to think that their team is head and shoulders above everyone...every year. LOL funny shit. Yeah, the Lakers beat us last year. But this is the NBA and that was last year. They forget how bad we were kicking their ass during game 1 and 2. If they think a team like the Spurs couldnt beat them in a 7 game series theyre fuckin stupid. Am I saying "we'll beat them for sure". No. I didnt say shit like that even during years when we were far and away better then them, because you only make yourself look like an ass....and sometimes a complete idiot when the playoffs role around. So to think that the #2 team wouldnt stand a chance in hell against the #1 team is fuckin retarded LOLLakers>>>>>Spurs. Get over it.not according to the last 10 yearsonce again, 3peat + winning the west 2 other times > 4 champions on 4 separate occasions. their was once a discussion about this on the TNT halftime report and everyone agreed that the 2nd title on a back-to-back was a lot bigger and harder than winning 1 title on its own. that was back when the Spurs were looking to get their first back-to-back, but of course, they failed. when you win a title, the whole league is out to get you. if you can win a title then, you did something historic... triple that notion for a threepeat. anyone who claims the Spurs have been the bigger/better franchise over this past decade is either a huge spurs fan or a huge laker hater...you fall under the latter.
Spurs still aren't fucking with the Lakers especially with Ariza in the mix
Anybody who has been paying attention for the last decade knows that you can never count the Spurs out though.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on February 04, 2009, 12:52:43 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on February 04, 2009, 12:55:19 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on February 03, 2009, 10:29:52 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 03, 2009, 09:21:01 PMOne thing I know, especially from this forum. Is that Laker fans talk the most during and before the season. Its been a while since they won a title, and yet they still have the nerve to think that their team is head and shoulders above everyone...every year. LOL funny shit. Yeah, the Lakers beat us last year. But this is the NBA and that was last year. They forget how bad we were kicking their ass during game 1 and 2. If they think a team like the Spurs couldnt beat them in a 7 game series theyre fuckin stupid. Am I saying "we'll beat them for sure". No. I didnt say shit like that even during years when we were far and away better then them, because you only make yourself look like an ass....and sometimes a complete idiot when the playoffs role around. So to think that the #2 team wouldnt stand a chance in hell against the #1 team is fuckin retarded LOLLakers>>>>>Spurs. Get over it.not according to the last 10 yearsonce again, 3peat + winning the west 2 other times > 4 champions on 4 separate occasions. their was once a discussion about this on the TNT halftime report and everyone agreed that the 2nd title on a back-to-back was a lot bigger and harder than winning 1 title on its own. that was back when the Spurs were looking to get their first back-to-back, but of course, they failed. when you win a title, the whole league is out to get you. if you can win a title then, you did something historic... triple that notion for a threepeat. anyone who claims the Spurs have been the bigger/better franchise over this past decade is either a huge spurs fan or a huge laker hater...you fall under the latter.Wrong again. Anyone who thinks that the Lakers of the last 10 yrs are better then the Spurs is either a huge Laker fan, or a Spurs hater. You fall under both. During your three peat years, yes....the Lakers were definetely better then the Spurs. That was for THREE years though. During our 4 titles, we were better then you each year. That would be.....you guessed it, FOUR years. So we already have you beat there. THEN, you take into account the fact that for the 10 yrs combined our win percentage was far better then yours, and everyones. Real shit, in all major sports (US) the Spurs have been the most successful franchise of the last 10 yrs. NO ONE is arguing that the Lakers have been. 30 yrs ago, a three peat was HUGE. But in the age of free agency, winning every other year 4 times is even harder. Especially when you consider they were contenders for the title in each year in between. Teams dont stay that good, for that long anymore when players are constanly moving from team to team. The Lakers were great for 3 of the last 10 yrs...and thats about it.
three peat was HUGE. But in the age of free agency, winning every other year 4 times is even harder.
Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 04, 2009, 04:39:12 PMthree peat was HUGE. But in the age of free agency, winning every other year 4 times is even harder. LMFAO
Quote from: Now_I_Know on February 04, 2009, 05:10:36 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 04, 2009, 04:39:12 PMthree peat was HUGE. But in the age of free agency, winning every other year 4 times is even harder. LMFAOlol calm down, you had the best player in all of basketball & a big man who was playing like the best big man of all time, at the time.it was a stacked team who should win.i mean you take away one of the componets to that ridiculous duo & i count zero; for the Lakers anyway.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on February 04, 2009, 05:10:36 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on February 04, 2009, 04:39:12 PMthree peat was HUGE. But in the age of free agency, winning every other year 4 times is even harder. LMFAOYou understand the way professional sports works nowadays right? Not that a three peat isnt great. It IS amazing. But its easier for a team to be great for a three year period, then fall off. Then it is for a team to win consistently over a 10 yr span. Even if they do not win the title EVERY year. If they were just a very good team for 10 yrs, with no titles, that would be completely different.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Print
