Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Titans @ Patriiots gamethread
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PM ---joe montana > steve young > dan marino
--- End quote ---
Joey is first. ;D
--- End quote ---
well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as better
but ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history
--- End quote ---
i'd say rings count for something. ;D
there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.
Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. :D
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PM ---joe montana > steve young > dan marino
--- End quote ---
You think Dan Marino never would have won an SB playing on the 9ers in the 90s? C'mon, Young is proof that he can't cut it on bad teams. Marino played on some stinker Fins teams and still excelled. I disagree with the Montana argument, but I understand it. I don't understand anyone saying Young over Marino.
And Cham, that aura is called nostalgia. We're all kids of the 80s. Out first memories of football is watching Montana hold up the trophy and hearing about how he'd held it before. If we were kids of the 50s that aura would have been around Unitas and Joe would have been just another great QB.
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:17:56 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PM ---joe montana > steve young > dan marino
--- End quote ---
Joey is first. ;D
--- End quote ---
well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as better
but ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history
--- End quote ---
i'd say rings count for something. ;D
there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.
Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. :D
--- End quote ---
rings = team stat
trent dilfer is better than dan marino or dan foutes?
Jaydc:
I agree about rings not being a factor.If matt cassel had been the qb for patriots instead of brady he would have almost the exact same stats and the same amount of rings.Rings are about the team.Barry sanders was the greatest running back in nfl history but he was never on a good team.
Shallow:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 09:06:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:17:56 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 08:14:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 19, 2009, 08:07:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 19, 2009, 07:49:14 PM ---joe montana > steve young > dan marino
--- End quote ---
Joey is first. ;D
--- End quote ---
well i know ur a football stat guy and stats say Young as better
but ill take the only 3 time Superbowl MVP in NFL history
--- End quote ---
i'd say rings count for something. ;D
there is some kind of aura behind Montana, which just makes him the best.
Young was unreal though; Sean Hill needs to pick up the slack. :D
--- End quote ---
rings = team stat
trent dilfer is better than dan marino or dan foutes?
--- End quote ---
No because he played in a different era, but Jim McMahon and Doug Williams shit on Marino and Fouts.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version