Wow this arizona-green bay game is amazing

[Twentytwofifty]

That was a punt return for a TD there, not a fumble recovery. 

is that a fact? honestly, i think they really have to rule it that.

Saw it was a fumble recovery on TV and on nfl.com, but don't think it should be. 

[Lunatic]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

[Chamillitary Click]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

depends if there is a definition for a punt.

ball never hit the ground, it went from his hand to his foot & it went about 4 feet in the air & was recovered & returned for a touchdown lol.

[Shallow]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

depends if there is a definition for a punt.

ball never hit the ground, it went from his hand to his foot & it went about 4 feet in the air & was recovered & returned for a touchdown lol.

My only complaint was the entire time the ball was recovered Rodgers' face mask was being held. I think you could have argued that he was being held from making a tackle.

[Chamillitary Click]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

depends if there is a definition for a punt.

ball never hit the ground, it went from his hand to his foot & it went about 4 feet in the air & was recovered & returned for a touchdown lol.

My only complaint was the entire time the ball was recovered Rodgers' face mask was being held. I think you could have argued that he was being held from making a tackle.

you probably could & it probably was.

but everything happened so fast & everybody was like "wtf?" & then by the time they recovered the last thing the refs were going to do was stop the play & call it back.

[Shallow]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

depends if there is a definition for a punt.

ball never hit the ground, it went from his hand to his foot & it went about 4 feet in the air & was recovered & returned for a touchdown lol.

My only complaint was the entire time the ball was recovered Rodgers' face mask was being held. I think you could have argued that he was being held from making a tackle.

you probably could & it probably was.

but everything happened so fast & everybody was like "wtf?" & then by the time they recovered the last thing the refs were going to do was stop the play & call it back.

Are there no challenge flags in playoff OT? Just wondering.

[Chamillitary Click]

Fumble recovery makes 100% sense to me. What would u guys rule that?

depends if there is a definition for a punt.

ball never hit the ground, it went from his hand to his foot & it went about 4 feet in the air & was recovered & returned for a touchdown lol.

My only complaint was the entire time the ball was recovered Rodgers' face mask was being held. I think you could have argued that he was being held from making a tackle.

you probably could & it probably was.

but everything happened so fast & everybody was like "wtf?" & then by the time they recovered the last thing the refs were going to do was stop the play & call it back.

Are there no challenge flags in playoff OT? Just wondering.

i'm like 98% sure you can't; but i always thought that you should be able to challenge penalties.

you only increase the chance of refs "fixing" games by saying whatever they call with flags stand.

like, if i was Rex Ryan yesterday, i would have challenged all three "illegal contact" calls & i would have won all three of them lol.

it's bullshit how players can fake something & the refs give them 30 yards on pass interference.

[S P I C E]

Horrible fluke ending to a great game.

[Lunatic]

the booth should have reviewed it as a precaution but i don't think anything should have been overturned

[Chamillitary Click]

the booth should have reviewed it as a precaution but i don't think anything should have been overturned

but they can't review it & then say, "actually there was holding on the play".

[Shallow]

the booth should have reviewed it as a precaution but i don't think anything should have been overturned

but they can't review it & then say, "actually there was holding on the play".

I think they could have called the 15 yard fask mask penalty. The only questin would have been whether it would have counted as roughing the passer. A face mask after the fumble just backs up the cards a bit and they score. a Face mask during the fumble means 15 yards a first down for GB, but in Arizona that might lead to trouble.

You don't have to challenge the penalty. You can challenge the fumble and then they can see whatever they see.

[Jaydc]

Yeah but thats the same thing.A penalty isnt reviewable.They cant reverse a call based on a penalty they missed.If someone got a touchdown they cant review the play and be like hey there was holding on that play we can reverse it.the rules are pretty clear on that.

[Shallow]

Yeah but thats the same thing.A penalty isnt reviewable.They cant reverse a call based on a penalty they missed.If someone got a touchdown they cant review the play and be like hey there was holding on that play we can reverse it.the rules are pretty clear on that.

Yes it is. The Music City Miracle was reviewed based on that exactly. It was determined that the ball was pass backwards, but if it was forward it would not have counted as a TD.

[Jaydc]

A pass backwards isnt the same as a holding or a facemask or a pass interference.....

[Shallow]

A pass backwards isnt the same as a holding or a facemask or a pass interference.....

Ok, maybe. All I know was you said penalty and I know it's happened before. All I know is I hear every time they review anything is that they say that only certain things are challenge-able but once under the booth the ref can call anything he wants.