It's June 05, 2024, 07:32:05 AM
i can agree wit the leakes bein leaked specially, but why would they be 'downgraded' or unfinished? doesnt make sense at all
I don't believe Dre intentionally leaks "downgraded" tracks. If anything, Dre fusses over a track forever and ever until it's perfect, then half the time decides to scrap the song anyway. That's why it takes so long for a Dr. Dre album to come out. But I don't think he would "downgrade" a song. Dre's too particular about how a song sounds. He wouldn't want people to hear a Dr. Dre song, intentionally made worse. Just my opinion.
Quote from: Pere on June 19, 2010, 03:43:46 AMi can agree wit the leakes bein leaked specially, but why would they be 'downgraded' or unfinished? doesnt make sense at allit creates hype, especially after 10 years of silence.Then you can complain about it leaking, which is promo.And you can see how it's received, people can help you make it better.If fans like it, create buzz over release.If fans don't like it, no problem just an unfinished leak.
Quote from: ikke on June 19, 2010, 07:47:25 AMQuote from: Pere on June 19, 2010, 03:43:46 AMi can agree wit the leakes bein leaked specially, but why would they be 'downgraded' or unfinished? doesnt make sense at allit creates hype, especially after 10 years of silence.Then you can complain about it leaking, which is promo.And you can see how it's received, people can help you make it better.If fans like it, create buzz over release.If fans don't like it, no problem just an unfinished leak.yes, but there ACTUALLY is a diffrence between finished and unfinished track, so if some1 wants a serious opinion, he would leak final version, or the one like 'crack a bottle' which was unfinished, but very close to the final one
Quote from: Pere on June 19, 2010, 09:54:45 AMQuote from: ikke on June 19, 2010, 07:47:25 AMQuote from: Pere on June 19, 2010, 03:43:46 AMi can agree wit the leakes bein leaked specially, but why would they be 'downgraded' or unfinished? doesnt make sense at allit creates hype, especially after 10 years of silence.Then you can complain about it leaking, which is promo.And you can see how it's received, people can help you make it better.If fans like it, create buzz over release.If fans don't like it, no problem just an unfinished leak.yes, but there ACTUALLY is a diffrence between finished and unfinished track, so if some1 wants a serious opinion, he would leak final version, or the one like 'crack a bottle' which was unfinished, but very close to the final oneLike I said, this creates anticipation and if the fans don't like it he can just throw it away without losing face.
i think the track was finished bar the hook ... the verses were complete and the beat was finished ... they just were going to add the hookbut both Dre & Jay Z would need to redo their vocals after hearing the Crooked I versionhe showed them how they should be riding that beat ... properly.
Quote from: Gambler on June 19, 2010, 04:40:13 AMi think the track was finished bar the hook ... the verses were complete and the beat was finished ... they just were going to add the hookbut both Dre & Jay Z would need to redo their vocals after hearing the Crooked I versionhe showed them how they should be riding that beat ... properly.i disagree with that,if crooked came out with his song on that,it wouldn't do nothing, but i got to remember west coast bias on this forum if one likes it,they swear it would go double plat yell
yeah i beleive the shit is leaked on purpose to get a reaction...if the reaction is good (ex Crack A Bottle) then it drops...if not then its back to the lab...Dr Dre is waaaaaaaaaay too guarded with his shit for it to leak out on accident....hell he is trying to sue Wideawake to stop the release of shit he made 15 years ago at Death Row...
but both Dre & Jay Z would need to redo their vocals after hearing the Crooked I versionhe showed them how they should be riding that beat ... properly.
They are leaked intentionally, true, but it's to support Dre's headphones and Recovery, not to "test the waters."