It's August 27, 2025, 09:35:38 PM
more cheerleader rivalries would be good for the nba.
why is boston rebuilding? they can still keep garnet, pierce and allenlakers will be done without phil jackson...
Quote from: 'EclipZe on June 24, 2010, 03:09:41 PMmore cheerleader rivalries would be good for the nba.as long as the Laker players promise to NEVER wear the Laker girl shorts again
Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on June 24, 2010, 03:22:34 PMQuote from: 'EclipZe on June 24, 2010, 03:09:41 PMmore cheerleader rivalries would be good for the nba.as long as the Laker players promise to NEVER wear the Laker girl shorts again LMAO, I actually forgot about that. Such an awful idea, someone on the Lakers promotion team fucked up.
Quote from: TheRemedy360 (back from the dead) on June 24, 2010, 07:36:10 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on June 24, 2010, 03:22:34 PMQuote from: 'EclipZe on June 24, 2010, 03:09:41 PMmore cheerleader rivalries would be good for the nba.as long as the Laker players promise to NEVER wear the Laker girl shorts again LMAO, I actually forgot about that. Such an awful idea, someone on the Lakers promotion team fucked up. Yeah that shit was bad lol. I remember the Celtics players laughin at em...
1 and 5 are on lock for Boston in the long run. Rondo and Perkins will be a problem for other teams, and Nate Robinson and Glen Davis will be contributors, but Boston needs some serious star power to compete for the title. I don't see LeBron going to Boston. We'll see.