Power Rankings week 13

[Shallow]

Brady > God.

Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.

[Chamillitary Click]

Brady > God.

Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.

When Cupid can hit 50 targets in a season, call me.

Someone sounds very aggravated that Brady is doing wonderfully without Randy Moss & Peyton Manning just went back to back weeks throwing 3 picks.

[Shallow]

Brady > God.

Only if you're an atheist. Because that means God is nothing, and even Brady is greater than nothing. Not by much, but still greater. There might also be a pagan god or two Brady is greater than. Maybe Cupid, I don't know. Actually, no way, Cupid's hits some tough targets with his arrow. Brady needs wide open targets that still have to adjust for the ball. Oh, wait, I know; Cronus, the father of Zeus. To protect his place on top of the universe he ate his children at birth to prevent the prophecy of his son overthrowing him from coming true. Zeus was born in secret and he eventually killed his father and saved his siblings, thus creating the 12 Gods of Olympus. Brady just runs out on his kids, he doesn't try and eat them. So Brady>God (for atheists) and Brady>Father of ancient Greek Gods.

When Cupid can hit 50 targets in a season, call me.

Someone sounds very aggravated that Brady is doing wonderfully without Randy Moss & Peyton Manning just went back to back weeks throwing 3 picks.

I'm pretty sure more than 50 couples a year fall in love. Brady is doing on par with Kyle Orton and Matt Cassel, who both don't have Moss or a Moss type WR but both play in more or less the exact same offense Brady plays in.

I don't know how anyone here can still argue with me. I predicted 11-5 when Brady got hurt. I predicted Kyle Orton to have big numbers with or with out Marshall. I predicted Matt Cassel to stink it up last year, and then predicted him to come alive this year when Wies got involved. These are all things I said would happen before they did. I even predicted last Sunday's Colts loss and said they'd have no answer on the line against SD. So when I say the Pats would be just fine with out Brady and Brady will end up like Moss with out the Pats, I think I have some ground to stand on.

And if you think your Jets would have a better shot at winning with Brady instead of Manning, you're fooling yourself.

[Chamillitary Click]

^Doesn't matter. Winning is winning, it doesn't matter if you do it by 42 or 14. Of course we'd have a "better" chance with Manning, but we'd still win the Super Bowl with Brady.

Nobody said Brady was better than Peyton. This is debate that Brady is better than more than "nothing".

& don't make me dig it up, but you clearly said the Pats wouldn't be as good without Moss. I clearly remember this when they waived him.

[Shallow]

^Doesn't matter. Winning is winning, it doesn't matter if you do it by 42 or 14. Of course we'd have a "better" chance with Manning, but we'd still win the Super Bowl with Brady.

Nobody said Brady was better than Peyton. This is debate that Brady is better than more than "nothing".

& don't make me dig it up, but you clearly said the Pats wouldn't be as good without Moss. I clearly remember this when they waived him.

And they aren't as good with out Moss. I never said they were done with out him. Numbers are down, but the defense has gotten better. The offense is still chugging along, but no way are the "better" with Tate instead of Moss. Of course this was said before they signed Branch who has been a key in the offense. When Branch was signed I knew they'd dink and dunk just fine, but they aren't as good a team with out Moss. Except for the game in New York against the Jets they were averaging 40 point s game with Moss. The next 4 games after Moss left they averaged 20. The Steelers shot themselves in the foot by not running the ball and the other two games were against the two worst Ds in the league.


Winning is winning and with Tom Brady instead of Sanchez last year the Colts still would have beaten the Jets, because Peyton Manning was on the other side. If Peyton wasn't on the Colts and on the Jets then the Jets would be going for back to back rings this year.

[Chamillitary Click]

^lol, "If Revis was on the Saints, they would be going back to back", "If a healthy Adrian Peterson was on the Packers, they would be a lock for the Superbowl", "If Philip Rivers broke his leg tomorrow, the Chargers would be finished". Too many if's.

If the Jets had Tom Brady & threw more often, making a weak Colts D off balance, then mixing it in with the best run attack in the league, whose to say we couldn't of score 35 points? & why would the addition of Brady make the Colts score more than 30? It's still the same defense.

[Shallow]

^lol, "If Revis was on the Saints, they would be going back to back", "If a healthy Adrian Peterson was on the Packers, they would be a lock for the Superbowl", "If Philip Rivers broke his leg tomorrow, the Chargers would be finished". Too many if's.

If the Jets had Tom Brady & threw more often, making a weak Colts D off balance, then mixing it in with the best run attack in the league, whose to say we couldn't of score 35 points? & why would the addition of Brady make the Colts score more than 30? It's still the same defense.

Sanchez on that day played as well as Brady could have and they lost because Peyton had one of those days that the Colts too often count on him having, and Peyton on the Jets would have have eaten alive the Saints with Revis, Rod Woodson and Deon Sanders. The Saints aren't that good. If Peyton simply didn't have that game h had the Jets would have won the SB.

You might with the SB this year with Brady. You might even with it with Sanchez. I wouldn't be shocked if the Jets won. The difference is with Peyton I'd be shocked if the Jets didn't win. With Peyton you get Peyton's offense. Brady doesn't bring an offense with him. He wouldn't be much better than Sanchez. He'd be Sanchez at his best every week, but not better than Sanchez om a hot day. You'd have been better than 9-7 and have won the East but you still would have lost to the Colts.

Now if you had Brady and Mcdaniels, Brady and Wies that'd be one thing, but the Jets are built to run. They don't have the blockers for dink and dunk screen plays or the protection to warrant 40 to 50 attempts a game. You wouldn't pass all that much more with Peyton either, but with Peyton you'd have to respect the pass so much that LT and Shonn Greene would eat teams live when defense drop back in coverage, and if they stuff the box then Peyton will fade route your ass off. Brady can't throw those kind of fades, not consistently enough to make it a threat. He needs extended time in the pocket for bombs or route breaks.

[Chamillitary Click]

I'm a fan of Sanchez, but it's unquestionable to put him & Tom Brady in the same sentence.

Easily has to make a Top 10 QB's of all-time list, where Mark isn't even in the Top 10, even 15 this season.

I'm not denying it's an automatic ring with Peyton & would be an easier a ride; but it's still as close as you can get to automatic with Brady.

You can say it's 100% chance of winning with Peyton, but it's still like 95% with Brady.

[Shallow]

I'm a fan of Sanchez, but it's unquestionable to put him & Tom Brady in the same sentence.

Easily has to make a Top 10 QB's of all-time list, where Mark isn't even in the Top 10, even 15 this season.

I'm not denying it's an automatic ring with Peyton & would be an easier a ride; but it's still as close as you can get to automatic with Brady.

You can say it's 100% chance of winning with Peyton, but it's still like 95% with Brady.

Not automatic. You're seeing Brady in a system built to make QBs look good. We've seen how bad Orton can be, and how bad Cassel can be. Why is it so hard to accept for people that Brady's fate would be the same as theirs, and Bledsoe's if he had o leave that situation. Brady could go elsewhere and succeed but it's not automatic. If he took Brees's spot in New Orleans they'd be alright. Ryan's spot in Atlanta, or Flacco's in Baltimore. He'd get killed in Pit and Fitz is a way better fit for Buffalo. Brady can't sling it. He doesn't have the arm or the nerves. He can stay in the pocket and look for the open man very well, but when the man's not open and he has to thread it, forget about it. Brady would do great in SD but he'd die in Indy. And in NYJ he wouldn't mean that much. It'd still be a run first team with Brady never being able to get in rhythm. Brady on the Jets would look like Orton did on the Bears.

[Shallow]

How bout them Chiefs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Man if they win it all a lot of people have to get off Brady's dick. Two games up on the Chargers. They win next week and they'll walk into the playoffs. I doubt a bye week but we can hope.

[Chamillitary Click]

How bout them Chiefs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Man if they win it all a lot of people have to get off Brady's dick. Two games up on the Chargers. They win next week and they'll walk into the playoffs. I doubt a bye week but we can hope.

No shot of winning a Superbowl. I'd put a large sum on that.

But when Cassell leads a Superbowl winning drive, I'll just consider him great, I won't take away from others.

[Shallow]

How bout them Chiefs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Man if they win it all a lot of people have to get off Brady's dick. Two games up on the Chargers. They win next week and they'll walk into the playoffs. I doubt a bye week but we can hope.

No shot of winning a Superbowl. I'd put a large sum on that.

But when Cassell leads a Superbowl winning drive, I'll just consider him great, I won't take away from others.

But I won't. I'll just consider him lucky to be on a team that can win a Superbowl. The kind of luck Dan Marino never had.

[OG Hack Wilson]

if the shitty-ass Chiefs win the fucking superbowl this year I'll paint my car red and get a yellow bumper lmao  thats how confident i'd be there

[Shallow]

if the shitty-ass Chiefs win the fucking superbowl this year I'll paint my car red and get a yellow bumper lmao  thats how confident i'd be there

If they look this good after hakf a season of the new OC and DC and a very young team, imagine how good they could look in a couple years. I'm not betting on them winning it this year, but I would be shocked if they didn't become a strong contender in the next few years. Unless Haley's stupid gambles do them in.

[OG Hack Wilson]

if the shitty-ass Chiefs win the fucking superbowl this year I'll paint my car red and get a yellow bumper lmao  thats how confident i'd be there

If they look this good after hakf a season of the new OC and DC and a very young team, imagine how good they could look in a couple years. I'm not betting on them winning it this year, but I would be shocked if they didn't become a strong contender in the next few years. Unless Haley's stupid gambles do them in.

they are 8-4 whcih is impressive, but the division their in is garbage

still deserving of a playoff spot (unlike the nfc west)