It's August 29, 2025, 02:00:25 AM
Quote from: THE RAPTURE on February 22, 2011, 12:12:43 AMQuote from: imsohappydatmydiccsbig on February 22, 2011, 12:06:11 AMof course it does. read the article..Quote:The producer and co-writer of "Serial Killa" and "For All My Niggaz & Bitches" thumped his chest about his closeness to the acclaimed projectwhy taking those songs in context, in an article about Daz recevin a publishing-check for his work on "Doggystyle"?money was for those songs, what else did he get paid for 18 yrs later?Because its something the article writer is saying in his own words. He obviously didn't ask daz about what songs he's getting paid for, otherwise it would have been a quote from daz. Its an assumption on the part of whoever wrote the article. no, its not an assumption.what r u tryin to say, that the writer wrote that Daz thumped his chest assuminly for his work on those 2 random songs (took out of context)?lolcause if you're writin for XXL and Vibe-magaizne or any other publication, quote-on-quote is liable by law..or else, that wouldnt been published withou proper confidence about the credit for those song.thats like Rollling Stone Magazine writin an article about Kurt Cobain, and sayin (just by assumption), that he wrote some Courtney Love records..
Quote from: imsohappydatmydiccsbig on February 22, 2011, 12:06:11 AMof course it does. read the article..Quote:The producer and co-writer of "Serial Killa" and "For All My Niggaz & Bitches" thumped his chest about his closeness to the acclaimed projectwhy taking those songs in context, in an article about Daz recevin a publishing-check for his work on "Doggystyle"?money was for those songs, what else did he get paid for 18 yrs later?Because its something the article writer is saying in his own words. He obviously didn't ask daz about what songs he's getting paid for, otherwise it would have been a quote from daz. Its an assumption on the part of whoever wrote the article.
of course it does. read the article..Quote:The producer and co-writer of "Serial Killa" and "For All My Niggaz & Bitches" thumped his chest about his closeness to the acclaimed projectwhy taking those songs in context, in an article about Daz recevin a publishing-check for his work on "Doggystyle"?money was for those songs, what else did he get paid for 18 yrs later?
Quote from: The Bigg M-A-U on February 21, 2011, 11:52:23 PMI believe Snoop confirmed Warren G did the beat for Ain't No Fun.I read a Snoop interview where he said Warren G and Nate brought the hook to Dre and Dre did the rest.
I believe Snoop confirmed Warren G did the beat for Ain't No Fun.
Ok, I've been listing to rap since the 80's, and guess I'm a little confused on who get's "Produced By" "Mixed By" credit.From my understanding, Dr. Dre makes the whole tracks and mixes. Recently reading D.O.C's interview, it sounds like he throws his name on tracks that someone else has worked on. Is this true? I mean we see Scott Storch, Timberland, etc, on like THE GAME's first album, and Dr. Dre production. D.O.C is saying he steals credit from other producers?
of course it does. read the article..Quote:The producer and co-writer of "Serial Killa" and "For All My Niggaz & Bitches" thumped his chest about his closeness to the acclaimed project
if the info is incorrect, the writer cant assume and visualize his assumptions in media as "real". law says it cant..u cant assume stuff as a writer, and showcase stuff/beliefs as mere facts.thats why everybody is so scared of lawsuits..
Quote from: doublee313 on February 21, 2011, 08:00:31 PMOk, I've been listing to rap since the 80's, and guess I'm a little confused on who get's "Produced By" "Mixed By" credit.From my understanding, Dr. Dre makes the whole tracks and mixes. Recently reading D.O.C's interview, it sounds like he throws his name on tracks that someone else has worked on. Is this true? I mean we see Scott Storch, Timberland, etc, on like THE GAME's first album, and Dr. Dre production. D.O.C is saying he steals credit from other producers?Where did he say that? I thought that it was a known fact that Dr. Dre don't usually create the beat. He just "produces" and mixes the records, what-ever-the-fuck-you wanna call it. I always thought that it's the same thing, but i guess to some people it ain't.
"naysayer-paranoia" is fascinating.nails in the coffin already, its been confrimed that Daz did the beats in numerous ways. dig through the whole thread..Daz, Kurupt and Snoop confirmed it, and the WideAwake-payment for his uncredited work on the "Doggystyle"-album confimrs it.why r u beatin around the bush?the article/interview implies that Daz also got paid for his proudction and writing on those 2 mentioned songs,the journalist cuouldnt assume it, cuz if he did - it wouldve been prsented as an "assumtion" in the published article.and no, Daz didnt get paid 100000US$ bcuz of his contributed work on those other tracks he perofrmed on. couldnt been sole reason(cuz he was already ASCAP-tied to some of em, and had generated publishing for some of them already)..the paper also served as an overdue 18year-compensation for those 2 songs (at least), and thats why Daz is "thumpin his chest" in the article.
Quote from: imsohappydatmydiccsbig on February 22, 2011, 01:39:25 PM"naysayer-paranoia" is fascinating.nails in the coffin already, its been confrimed that Daz did the beats in numerous ways. dig through the whole thread..Daz, Kurupt and Snoop confirmed it, and the WideAwake-payment for his uncredited work on the "Doggystyle"-album confimrs it.why r u beatin around the bush?the article/interview implies that Daz also got paid for his proudction and writing on those 2 mentioned songs,the journalist cuouldnt assume it, cuz if he did - it wouldve been prsented as an "assumtion" in the published article.and no, Daz didnt get paid 100000US$ bcuz of his contributed work on those other tracks he perofrmed on. couldnt been sole reason(cuz he was already ASCAP-tied to some of em, and had generated publishing for some of them already)..the paper also served as an overdue 18year-compensation for those 2 songs (at least), and thats why Daz is "thumpin his chest" in the article.How do you know what Daz got paid for? Did we read the same article? Daz is quoted as saying he got paid for Doggystyle and then thumped his chest. Then the article writer calls him the producer for 2 tracks. That's something the writer is saying. You gotta at least know how to read stories.
Quote from: THE RAPTURE on February 22, 2011, 01:47:49 PMQuote from: imsohappydatmydiccsbig on February 22, 2011, 01:39:25 PM"naysayer-paranoia" is fascinating.nails in the coffin already, its been confrimed that Daz did the beats in numerous ways. dig through the whole thread..Daz, Kurupt and Snoop confirmed it, and the WideAwake-payment for his uncredited work on the "Doggystyle"-album confimrs it.why r u beatin around the bush?the article/interview implies that Daz also got paid for his proudction and writing on those 2 mentioned songs,the journalist cuouldnt assume it, cuz if he did - it wouldve been prsented as an "assumtion" in the published article.and no, Daz didnt get paid 100000US$ bcuz of his contributed work on those other tracks he perofrmed on. couldnt been sole reason(cuz he was already ASCAP-tied to some of em, and had generated publishing for some of them already)..the paper also served as an overdue 18year-compensation for those 2 songs (at least), and thats why Daz is "thumpin his chest" in the article.How do you know what Daz got paid for? Did we read the same article? Daz is quoted as saying he got paid for Doggystyle and then thumped his chest. Then the article writer calls him the producer for 2 tracks. That's something the writer is saying. You gotta at least know how to read stories.i know it bcuz of my dear friend named "logic".theres no sense in payin the man a 100 stacks for work, that he already had partial ASCAP-credited publishing for..