It's May 28, 2024, 07:19:39 AM
There is good and bad in every nation and in some respects the likes of Syria, Libya were more free, certainly in the case of Libya received more help and were more affluent than us. No nation is wholly evil it's parasitic elements within that tare but the point is the invasion and destruction of nations is evil, worse still when said nation cannot defend itself. I do though disagree regarding suckering in China because since Libya was an important asset to China, then if they had wished to they could have vetoed at the UN but instead they didn't. This tells me that a back room deal was worked out in which China agreed to the overthrow of the political regime operating in Libya.
I'm not saying that middle eastern countries leadership are any better or worse than ours, but one thing's for sure, their society is far better, more civilized, friendlier, and safer than in the UK or US (Iran we're talking about) they don't have the social problems, the drug issues, and lack of respect in the youth over there, so they must be doing something right... Anyone remember Iraq before and after the invasion? Before the invasion, illegal drug use was very rare, and after the US & UK invasion it was pretty much everywhere. Anyone ever been to Iran or Libya before? UK & US can't go around policing the world, and bullying people into sanctions "they" create from thin air. If I were Iran, I too would be racing to make a nuclear deterrent, after seeing Iraq, Afghanistan & Libya bullied into giving up their countries. The West may get oil from it, but they're pushing those countries into a degree of unresolvable scarring, and control of banks with no other motive than to have an evil grip on them forever. Anyone who's tried to escape it's grip and come together, to create laws, or even pay back these people are assassinated (see: Lincoln, and JFK) Iran is bigger than the UK, but like Russia, most of their country is unoccupied by anyone. I think Iran has a population of around 72 mil, while UK has around 66 mil. Not much of a difference, and when you put the military spending power in place, UK being 3rd or 4th in the world, it's not a fair fight, especially when they bring along the rest of it's buddies (US, & France) along to the party as well
WW3 will probably be done backdoor. Trade, stock, debt and so on. Frontline warfare on a global scale is a thing of the past
^China needs the west to stay alive because they can't come up with shit themselves. They need western invention and know-how on how to do things, they can only imitate, not innovate. Therefore they need countries in the west to stay on a certain level, without them they can't have progress or trade.