It's June 12, 2024, 11:00:38 PM
Total Members Voted: 9
Now, as far as your claims go with qbs. You say Matt hasselbeck was ballin, Matt schaub is nothing special and mark Sanchez is a joke. But you look at the stats and hasselbeck and Sanchez have very comparable numbers. Sanchez threw for 3,447 yds, 26 Tds, 18 ints and had a qb rating of 78.2. While hasselbeck threw for 3,571 yds, 18 Tds , 14 ints and had a QB rating of 82.4. So hasselbeck was ballin and Sanchez is pathetic? LOL. Fail.Take off the homer glasses Luna, you're making yourself look dumb. Schaub meanwhile in only ten games threw for 2,479 yds, 15 Tds,6 ints and had a QB rating of 96.8. Schaubs career QB rating is 92.8. Peyton manning has a career qb rating of 94.9 to put that into perspective. Not bad for someone who's " nothing special." Matt hasselbecks career qb rating is 82.2.You clearly are blinded by the love of your team.
Peyton behind our already good pass blocking line with Hutch comin in and maybe one of the Texans fa would be ridiculous. CJ is gonna be revitalised by finally havin a great qb and should have a return to form. And Britt healthy with Williams showing promise our offense would instantly be supercharged by what a healthy Peyton would bring.
If the colts were a CFL team how did they win a superbowl in spite of Peyton not because of him?
Arizonia is the best fit for him.
Quote from: rayallen0 on March 16, 2012, 12:54:17 PMArizonia is the best fit for him.But he's already told them no.I'm talking between Titans & Broncos, Titans are a better fit.
Quote from: Lunatic on March 16, 2012, 01:38:14 PMQuote from: rayallen0 on March 16, 2012, 12:54:17 PMArizonia is the best fit for him.But he's already told them no.I'm talking between Titans & Broncos, Titans are a better fit.he did? weird sorry wasnt up to date.I would prefer Broncos, just cuz i want to see Jake start ASAP. but playing behind Peyton can only help your learning process.
looks like the 49ers are now in the hunt.
Quote from: OG Jaydc on March 15, 2012, 10:19:52 PMNow, as far as your claims go with qbs. You say Matt hasselbeck was ballin, Matt schaub is nothing special and mark Sanchez is a joke. But you look at the stats and hasselbeck and Sanchez have very comparable numbers. Sanchez threw for 3,447 yds, 26 Tds, 18 ints and had a qb rating of 78.2. While hasselbeck threw for 3,571 yds, 18 Tds , 14 ints and had a QB rating of 82.4. So hasselbeck was ballin and Sanchez is pathetic? LOL. Fail.Take off the homer glasses Luna, you're making yourself look dumb. Schaub meanwhile in only ten games threw for 2,479 yds, 15 Tds,6 ints and had a QB rating of 96.8. Schaubs career QB rating is 92.8. Peyton manning has a career qb rating of 94.9 to put that into perspective. Not bad for someone who's " nothing special." Matt hasselbecks career qb rating is 82.2.You clearly are blinded by the love of your team.No homer glassesThe difference is...Matt Hasselbeck is a temporary to fix to our next franchise QB.Mark Sanchez IS YOUR FRANCHISE QBThe comparable #s show why he's pathetic and Hasselbeck is not.Hasselbeck would be lucky to start this season, Manning or no Manning.
The problem with the Niners is while on paper it looks like the best chance to win it all, and probably is, the downside is really high. He'll be walking into a new team he doesn't know, he might end up clashing with the coach and with Moss and it may end up a disaster but it'll be seen as the ultimate choke.