Author Topic: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!  (Read 361 times)

Hack Wilson - real

PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« on: September 04, 2014, 04:25:29 PM »
nfl is here


 

Remedy360

  • Guest
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2014, 10:42:36 PM »
Talk about getting punched in the mouth. Was this the replacement refs fault too?
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2014, 10:44:54 PM »
Seahawks played great. That defensive hold with eight to play in the fourth quarter was lame though. A-Rod would of made it close.

Packers D is weak. But damn at the options they run with Percy now.
 

Shallow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Karma: 215
  • I never had a digital pic of myself before
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2014, 09:08:13 AM »
I guess they didn't want to risk him getting hurt, but if the Packers and Seahawks play in the playoffs and the Packers don't utilize Rodger's legs then I can only call it complete stupidity. Its silly to stay in the pocket against a Carrol defense when you have a QB that can run. I'm predicting it now, Cam Newton is going to make this defense look horrible on Oct. 26. As bad as Vince Young made the Trojans look. A pocket passer has little chance against it, but a runner can make them old and tired fast.

I feel silly saying it, but Tim Tebow and the Broncos may have won the Superbowl last year against the Hawks. The problem is they never would have made the playoffs, or get past the Pats if they did make the playoffs.
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2014, 10:16:05 AM »
yeah, i thought green bay was/is a 10 win team this year but maybe i overestimated that offensive line
 

Remedy360

  • Guest
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2014, 09:15:38 PM »
I guess they didn't want to risk him getting hurt, but if the Packers and Seahawks play in the playoffs and the Packers don't utilize Rodger's legs then I can only call it complete stupidity. Its silly to stay in the pocket against a Carrol defense when you have a QB that can run. I'm predicting it now, Cam Newton is going to make this defense look horrible on Oct. 26. As bad as Vince Young made the Trojans look. A pocket passer has little chance against it, but a runner can make them old and tired fast.



LOL. I look forward to it.
 

Hack Wilson - real

Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2014, 09:21:59 PM »
I guess they didn't want to risk him getting hurt, but if the Packers and Seahawks play in the playoffs and the Packers don't utilize Rodger's legs then I can only call it complete stupidity. Its silly to stay in the pocket against a Carrol defense when you have a QB that can run. I'm predicting it now, Cam Newton is going to make this defense look horrible on Oct. 26. As bad as Vince Young made the Trojans look. A pocket passer has little chance against it, but a runner can make them old and tired fast.



LOL. I look forward to it.

Shallow is right though


Cotchery is gonna tear that Seahawks defense a new asshole....Seattle better double team him on 3rd downs if they want to win. 
 

Teddy Roosevelt

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7538
  • Karma: 179
  • The Trust-Buster
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2014, 05:37:45 AM »
I seriously doubt mobile QBs are the Seahawk's weakness. Keep in mind they faced Colin Kaepernick 3 times last year and they didn't give up 20 points in any of them. And the Panthers could only put up 7 points against the Seahawks last year.
 

BiggSadot

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Karma: -3
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2014, 11:17:54 AM »
I agree with Teddy. You have to think these guys play against Russel in practice n Kaepernick on the regular. This teams only weakness is gonna be injury or their egos getting to them and them lookin past a team like they did the falcons in the playoffs two years ago.
Sometimes I need reminders why I bother to rap
Then I think back to cats who only father is rap
I dead beats, but you niggas is Lou
Im Uncle Phil gotta give em somethin real
cause If I dont who will
 

Remedy360

  • Guest
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2014, 12:44:59 PM »
I will say that mobile QB's have given them problems in comparison to pocket passers, the obvious example being how much more difficult Kap was to stop in the playoffs last year as opposed to Manning. With that said though, to say that Cam (who hasn't done shit against them the last two times they've played) will look like Vince Young against the Trojans is pretty comical.
 

Shallow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Karma: 215
  • I never had a digital pic of myself before
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2014, 11:05:10 PM »
I seriously doubt mobile QBs are the Seahawk's weakness. Keep in mind they faced Colin Kaepernick 3 times last year and they didn't give up 20 points in any of them. And the Panthers could only put up 7 points against the Seahawks last year.


Because Kap is a moron who gets to the red zone with his legs and then tries to score with his arm.
 

Shallow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Karma: 215
  • I never had a digital pic of myself before
Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2014, 11:11:30 PM »
I will say that mobile QB's have given them problems in comparison to pocket passers, the obvious example being how much more difficult Kap was to stop in the playoffs last year as opposed to Manning. With that said though, to say that Cam (who hasn't done shit against them the last two times they've played) will look like Vince Young against the Trojans is pretty comical.

You have a point. If the Panthers are stupid enough to keep Cam in the pocket against them, like they did for the most in the last two games, then yeah Cam won't do shit. But if they draw up designed QB runs and tell Cam to look for lanes to run after scrambling then he will wear down the defense early.
 

DJ SUGAFREE QUIK

Re: PACKERS @ SEAHAWKS, BITCH!
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2014, 05:08:57 AM »
yeah, i thought green bay was/is a 10 win team this year but maybe i overestimated that offensive line
They're mainly a playoff contender because of their weak division.  I wasn't surprised seattle whooped them.  GB can't beat Frisco no mo & seattle knows how to beat them.  GB messed up going to a 3-4 copying these other teams.  Their defense was better in the 4-3, when they would own frisco.