Author Topic: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)  (Read 284675 times)

Sccit

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4335 on: March 12, 2026, 11:33:18 AM »
I liked Missionary OK when judged on its own merits, but as the long-anticipated full-length reunion between the two, I understand the disappointment for sure.

Is the rumor true that he didn't actually sign the signed copies? They don't look like his typical signature, but on the other hand, I did see a wine bottle he signed that looked pretty close.

they were printed signatures lol
 

JeremyM

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4336 on: March 12, 2026, 07:17:35 PM »
they were printed signatures lol

They're not printed, they all have differences. They were signed by a real person, just not necessarily by Snoop...which is lame if so.
 

Sccit

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4337 on: March 12, 2026, 09:44:57 PM »
They're not printed, they all have differences. They were signed by a real person, just not necessarily by Snoop...which is lame if so.


maybe i'm thinking of the ice cube album .. or some other legend iirc


i remember one of those albums had a printed signature on em
 
The following users thanked this post: JeremyM

JeremyM

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4338 on: Yesterday at 02:10:04 AM »

maybe i'm thinking of the ice cube album .. or some other legend iirc


i remember one of those albums had a printed signature on em

Cube's are all legit. I believe Cardi B was caught using an autopen.
 

Sccit

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4339 on: Yesterday at 07:51:51 AM »
Cube's are all legit. I believe Cardi B was caught using an autopen.

it was a west coast legend .. the signatures were printed on the discs i believe
 

JeremyM

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4340 on: Yesterday at 05:04:56 PM »
it was a west coast legend .. the signatures were printed on the discs i believe

Aw, that was probably Daz, he sold RRGB2 as being signed for a time and then there was a printed and obviously not real sig on the artwork (but it was clearly part of the art, nobody would think it was being presented as a real sig). But I think that was just him not knowing how to set up his store as he adjusted his shop later on. Now his CDs have both a signed and unsigned option with the signed costing more money.
 
The following users thanked this post: Sccit

Sccit

Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4341 on: Yesterday at 05:36:46 PM »
Aw, that was probably Daz, he sold RRGB2 as being signed for a time and then there was a printed and obviously not real sig on the artwork (but it was clearly part of the art, nobody would think it was being presented as a real sig). But I think that was just him not knowing how to set up his store as he adjusted his shop later on. Now his CDs have both a signed and unsigned option with the signed costing more money.

that mighta been it
 

shifter

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 150
  • Karma: 7
Re: SNOOP DOGG - MISSIONARY (Official Discussion)
« Reply #4342 on: Yesterday at 11:37:46 PM »
This is dope we'll get to hear this record soon!!

Topless is one of the better Detox leaks