NFL allegedly asked Kendrick Lamar to not perform “Not Like Us” at Super Bowl

[abusive]

NFL Allegedly Asked Kendrick Lamar to Avoid Performing “Not Like Us” at Super Bowl
In a stunning revelation, rumors report that the NFL allegedly asked Kendrick Lamar not to perform his hit, “Not Like Us.” This performance is in regards to the at the Super Bowl halftime performance. Lamar, continues to be one of the most influential figures in modern rap. His lyrics, particularly in songs like “Not Like Us,” challenge societal norms. In addition to fueling rap beef with Drake.

While Kendrick Lamar’s performance at the Super Bowl halftime show is widely anticipated, the NFL seems hesitant. Especially those with strong political undertones. The request to avoid “Not Like Us” is sparking debate about the NFL’s approach to music and free expression. Particularly, when it comes to performances at one of the world’s most-watched events.

What is “Not Like Us” and Why Was it Controversial?
“Not Like Us,” is a raw and powerful commentary on race relations and allegedly antagonizing rapper Drake. The song’s lyrics contain sharp critiques of the status quo. In addition to addressing the complex dynamics between different societal group.

In a time when issues of race and equality are at the forefront of national discourse, Kendrick Lamar’s music is a beacon for social justice. However, his songs carry strong political messages. Which some critics argue may not align with the commercial interests of major corporations. Platforms such as the NFL, seek to maintain a neutral image.

The potential for “Not Like Us” to stir controversy is a primary reason why the NFL allegedly asked Kendrick Lamar to avoid performing the song. The halftime show is seen by millions worldwide. With the NFL often criticized for its cautious stance on politically charged performances. Especially after the controversial performances in previous years.

Why Did the NFL Ask Kendrick Lamar to Avoid “Not Like Us”?
The NFL’s reported request, raises important questions about the league’s stance on political expression in entertainment. There are several possible reasons behind the NFL’s alleged request.

1. The NFL’s Caution Around Political Messages
The NFL continues to be cautious of political statements during its most high-profile events. In particular, the controversy surrounding Colin Kaepernick’s peaceful protest during the national anthem in 2016. This moment sparked a divide between the league and certain players, fans, and sponsors. Kaepernick’s protest is a response to police violence against Black people. Additionally, it igniting a fierce debate about patriotism and free speech.

Since then, the NFL tries to navigate the delicate balance between endorsing diversity and avoiding political controversy. While the league is making strides in promoting social justice initiatives it is clear that the NFL remains cautious about music that explicitly critiques the establishment.

In this context, “Not Like Us” is viewed as a politically charged track. Potentially alienating a portion of the audience or upsetting corporate sponsors. This caution likely influenced the NFL’s decision to request that Lamar avoid performing the song.

2. The Commercial Impact of a Controversial Song
The Super Bowl halftime show is not just a musical performance; it is a massive commercial platform. Each minute of airtime is worth millions of dollars in advertising. With the NFL working hard to ensure that the show appeals to a broad audience. This includes families, children, and advertisers. The NFL’s concern may have been that a performance of “Not Like Us” will alienate viewers. Especially those uncomfortable expressing political views.

As the NFL continues to cater to its sponsors—many of whom are major corporate brands—it is not surprising that they would seek to avoid any content that could harm the image of their partners. The league’s request is an effort to maintain the commercial neutrality of the event. Further, ensuring that it appeals to as many people as possible.

3. Lamar’s History of Controversial Performances
Kendrick Lamar’s live performances are known for their intensity and political themes. In the past, Lamar has used his stage as a platform to speak out against inequality and other pressing social issues. His performances often include visuals or statements that confront uncomfortable truths. Which could be seen as divisive for a mass-market event like the Super Bowl.

For instance, during the 2022 Super Bowl halftime show, Dr. Dre, Snoop Dogg, Eminem, and others performed. However, their set was notably free of overt political statements. Despite the fact that some of their music is associated with rebellion. The NFL may have been hesitant to allow Lamar to perform a song that is so overtly political. Additionally, fearing it might distract from the entertainment and become the focal point of media coverage.

Kendrick Lamar’s Response: Staying True to His Art
Kendrick Lamar is known for his authenticity and commitment to his art, often using his platform to address uncomfortable truths. Despite the NFL’s alleged request, Lamar has continued to emphasize the importance of expressing his personal beliefs and addressing social justice issues through his music.

Lamar’s refusal to censor his message is consistent with his long history of using his platform for activism. He has received both praise and criticism for his politically charged lyrics, but he remains one of the most respected voices in hip-hop because of his willingness to speak truth to power. While there are no official statements from Lamar regarding this specific incident, it is clear that he values the freedom to express himself through his music.

Moreover, Lamar’s potential decision not to bow to pressure from the NFL might make him an even stronger role model for his fans, especially those who look up to him for his commitment to social justice. His music continues to be a reflection of his experiences and his desire to provoke thought and inspire change.

The NFL and the Future of Music at the Super Bowl
The reported incident with Kendrick Lamar highlights a broader issue: the relationship between the NFL, music, and political expression. In recent years, the Super Bowl halftime show has become a stage for more diverse acts, with artists like Beyoncé, Shakira, and Jennifer Lopez taking the spotlight. However, this inclusivity has not been without its challenges, particularly when it comes to balancing the political messages of the performers with the commercial interests of the NFL.

The question remains whether the NFL will continue to ask artists to censor their music for the sake of avoiding controversy. As more musicians and public figures embrace activism, it may become increasingly difficult for the league to maintain a neutral stance on politically charged performances.

One thing is clear: the future of music at the Super Bowl is likely to see more friction between artistic freedom and corporate sponsorship. The NFL’s relationship with its performers will need to evolve to accommodate the growing demand for music that addresses social justice issues.

 Will This Impact Kendrick Lamar’s Relationship with the NFL?
If the NFL’s alleged request to Kendrick Lamar not to perform “Not Like Us” is true, it could have a lasting impact on the rapper’s relationship with the league. While Lamar has enjoyed success as part of past Super Bowl performances, this incident could influence his future involvement with the NFL.

For some, this could be seen as a missed opportunity for the NFL to embrace an artist who is both immensely talented and culturally significant. For Lamar, it may underscore the tension between his commitment to activism and the expectations of corporate partners.

However, it is also possible that Lamar’s fans will view this request as yet another sign of the NFL’s unwillingness to fully embrace artists who speak out on important issues. This could lead to increased support for Lamar’s music and activism, even if it means distancing himself from mainstream commercial events like the Super Bowl.

The NFL and the Evolution of Music at Major Events
The alleged request for Kendrick Lamar to avoid performing “Not Like Us” at the Super Bowl reflects the ongoing tension between music, politics, and corporate interests. While the NFL’s desire to maintain a neutral, family-friendly image is understandable, it also highlights the challenges of navigating today’s cultural climate, where artists are increasingly using their platforms to address important social issues.

As the music industry continues to evolve and as more artists like Kendrick Lamar embrace activism, the future of music at major events like the Super Bowl may look very different. Whether or not Lamar ultimately performs at future NFL events, one thing is clear: the conversation about political expression in mainstream entertainment is far from over.

The post NFL allegedly asked Kendrick Lamar to not perform “Not Like Us” at Super Bowl appeared first on Hip Hop Vibe.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/football/nfl-allegedly-asked-kendrick-lamar-to-not-perform-not-like-us-at-super-bowl/ar-AA1xlZJo

[Sccit]

interesting

[BIGWORM]

Drake took losing to another level. his true colours came out. he disrespected his own fans buy suing.

[D-TalkX]

i thought this was coming. I think if the song wasn’t as popular as it has become, they’d really put a stamp on it. Lotta tie ins aith different media companies/labels/production companies/tributaries. All they can do is ask and hope, I don’t see Kendrick complying. I think he has to do it now.

I predict an entire set, everyone thinking it’s over…then PSYCHE ends the show with it in some form.

Again, this is my opinion. I don’t understand all this hype. Kendrick has a few slappers but 90%… zzzzzz

All this is good for hip hop in a lot of ways but there’s so many factors. I can think of many more rappers that are better. Drake is corny and wack in so many ways. J-Cole is dope but lame as hell for his part in all this.

Where are you guys at with this top 3 shit? I personally don’t think any of them are anywhere near. I like J-Cole’s catalogue the best…. Personally, I think Joyner is ahead of all 4. Dave East is dope as fuck as well…

[HighEyeCue]

so they asked him not to perform his most "popular" song?

i thought this was coming. I think if the song wasn’t as popular as it has become, they’d really put a stamp on it. Lotta tie ins aith different media companies/labels/production companies/tributaries. All they can do is ask and hope, I don’t see Kendrick complying. I think he has to do it now.

I predict an entire set, everyone thinking it’s over…then PSYCHE ends the show with it in some form.

Again, this is my opinion. I don’t understand all this hype. Kendrick has a few slappers but 90%… zzzzzz

All this is good for hip hop in a lot of ways but there’s so many factors. I can think of many more rappers that are better. Drake is corny and wack in so many ways. J-Cole is dope but lame as hell for his part in all this.

Where are you guys at with this top 3 shit? I personally don’t think any of them are anywhere near. I like J-Cole’s catalogue the best…. Personally, I think Joyner is ahead of all 4. Dave East is dope as fuck as well…

none of these new age rappers are really that great imo...gimme Xzibit and Crooked I

[abusive]

so they asked him not to perform his most "popular" song?

none of these new age rappers are really that great imo...gimme Xzibit and Crooked I

I went over the paperwork for Drake's most recent case against UMG and it looks like Drake's allegations may have spooked the NFL. The article is just PR to make it look like everything except what it actually is. If Kendrick performs that song, it could potentially cause Drake to sue the NFL. Not only sue but win because he has a strong case. I hate when people talk about rappers winning battles but losing wars... That said, if Kendrick can't perform Not Like Us at The Super bowl, Drake definitely lost the battle but won the war.

[thegooddoc]

I went over the paperwork for Drake's most recent case against UMG and it looks like Drake's allegations may have spooked the NFL. The article is just PR to make it look like everything except what it actually is. If Kendrick performs that song, it could potentially cause Drake to sue the NFL. Not only sue but win because he has a strong case. I hate when people talk about rappers winning battles but losing wars... That said, if Kendrick can't perform Not Like Us at The Super bowl, Drake definitely lost the battle but won the war.

Drake is not going to win a lawsuit against the NFL over Not Like Us and there is absolutely no chance that Kendrick won't perform the song at the Super Bowl.  My prediction is that he will have 83,000+ people singing along to "a - minorrrrrrrrrrrrrr" 

Please stop pretending that Drake has any sort of case for defamation, much less a strong case.  The defamation part of the UMG case is going to be thrown out in summary judgement.  It is all a ploy to get UMG to negotiate with Drake, nothing more.   

[D-TalkX]

I went over the paperwork for Drake's most recent case against UMG and it looks like Drake's allegations may have spooked the NFL. The article is just PR to make it look like everything except what it actually is. If Kendrick performs that song, it could potentially cause Drake to sue the NFL. Not only sue but win because he has a strong case. I hate when people talk about rappers winning battles but losing wars... That said, if Kendrick can't perform Not Like Us at The Super bowl, Drake definitely lost the battle but won the war.

Definitely interesting but unlikely as this would fall under Freedom of Speech. The only way it can go sideways would be if Kendrick opted in in to some form of performance contract that had terms outlining certain restrictions. I don’t see  any legit artist going for that

[mtbsm]

nothing about this can or ever will be a W for Drake lmao

[abusive]

Definitely interesting but unlikely as this would fall under Freedom of Speech. The only way it can go sideways would be if Kendrick opted in in to some form of performance contract that had terms outlining certain restrictions. I don’t see  any legit artist going for that

Nah. The paperwork talked about the Not Like Us song, and the artwork for the cover that shows his crib. It talked about a shooting (where his security guard got shot) that happened at his crib right after the song dropped. It also talked about another incident that happened after the first with someone trying to gain access to his property and was saying things about him. Those two actions were attributed to the song and cover art. That counts as defamation on two levels. In words and in art. There were more things that happened but those were the main two.

Defamation is a civil action that covers false statements that cause reputational harm. Libel and slander are two types of defamation. Libel includes written or pictorial defamatory statements while slander includes verbal defamatory statements.

Defamation Lawsuits
State defamation laws vary, but some accepted standards exist no matter where you are or who you are suing. Generally, to win a defamation lawsuit, you must prove that:

Someone made a statement;

The statement was published;

The statement caused your injury;

The statement was false; and

The statement did not fall into a privileged category

These terms and details are further defined below:

https://www.findlaw.com/injury/torts-and-personal-injuries/defamation-law-the-basics.html

They are convicting rappers because of their lyrics even though freedom of speech is the most common argument against it.

[thegooddoc]

Nah. The paperwork talked about the Not Like Us song, and the artwork for the cover that shows his crib. It talked about a shooting (where his security guard got shot) that happened at his crib right after the song dropped. It also talked about another incident that happened after the first with someone trying to gain access to his property and was saying things about him. Those two actions were attributed to the song and cover art. That counts as defamation on two levels. In words and in art. There were more things that happened but those were the main two.
https://www.findlaw.com/injury/torts-and-personal-injuries/defamation-law-the-basics.html

They are convicting rappers because of their lyrics even though freedom of speech is the most common argument against it.

You left out the part about celebrities and the need to prove actual malice.  Almost impossible to prove against his own record label which has a financial stake in his reputation.  You also left out the part that they have to prove there was a false statement.  I have yet to see anyone make a convincing argument that Kendrick actually called Drake a PDF.  Drake is never going to win that case.

[abusive]

You left out the part about celebrities and the need to prove actual malice.  Almost impossible to prove against his own record label which has a financial stake in his reputation.  You also left out the part that they have to prove there was a false statement.  I have yet to see anyone make a convincing argument that Kendrick actually called Drake a PDF.  Drake is never going to win that case.

*sighs*
The bulk of your above comments are refutable. You saying he'll never win is your opinion. This isn't about his record label or Kendrick tho so I don't feel the need to address it. My point was about the NFL being spooked by Drake's latest lawsuit and possibly not wanting Kendrick to perform a song that could potentially get them sued. The lawsuit against UMG is going to take time to play out. The superbowl is next month. The NFL may or may not want to roll the dice and have Kendrick perform the song. Why? Because, if they do, and Drake does win the UMG defamation case, then that would mean they participated in defamation as well.

[D-TalkX]

*sighs*
The bulk of your above comments are refutable. You saying he'll never win is your opinion. This isn't about his record label or Kendrick tho so I don't feel the need to address it. My point was about the NFL being spooked by Drake's latest lawsuit and possibly not wanting Kendrick to perform a song that could potentially get them sued. The lawsuit against UMG is going to take time to play out. The superbowl is next month. The NFL may or may not want to roll the dice and have Kendrick perform the song. Why? Because, if they do, and Drake does win the UMG defamation case, then that would mean they participated in defamation as well.

Excellent point.... hmmm... now I'm wondering what will happen... I think you're right though, this may have been the only way to stop the song being performed at the Super Bowl... Clever....pathetic...but clever haha

[thegooddoc]

*sighs*
The bulk of your above comments are refutable. You saying he'll never win is your opinion. This isn't about his record label or Kendrick tho so I don't feel the need to address it. My point was about the NFL being spooked by Drake's latest lawsuit and possibly not wanting Kendrick to perform a song that could potentially get them sued. The lawsuit against UMG is going to take time to play out. The superbowl is next month. The NFL may or may not want to roll the dice and have Kendrick perform the song. Why? Because, if they do, and Drake does win the UMG defamation case, then that would mean they participated in defamation as well.

His non-existent case against the NFL would actually be worse than the case against UMG or Kendrick.  Even if he proved defamation, which I don't think he will, he would then have to prove that the NFL allowed it to intentionally harm him.  There are ANTI-SLAPP laws that would kill that case quickly.  It is fun to have soap opera drama discussions about this stuff, but there is zero chance that Kendrick would not perform Not Like Us at the Superbowl, unless Drake sued Kendrick personally, which I doubt Drake would do or could win.   

[abusive]

His non-existent case against the NFL would actually be worse than the case against UMG or Kendrick.  Even if he proved defamation, which I don't think he will, he would then have to prove that the NFL allowed it to intentionally harm him.  There are ANTI-SLAPP laws that would kill that case quickly.  It is fun to have soap opera drama discussions about this stuff, but there is zero chance that Kendrick would not perform Not Like Us at the Superbowl, unless Drake sued Kendrick personally, which I doubt Drake would do or could win.

Ok.