It's August 21, 2025, 08:48:08 PM
Said no one ever. 2001 is an iconic album. Everyone knows what 2001 is. Anyone who doesn’t know is a goofy nerd or ignorant asshole
okay go try it then.. just say casually in conversation to someone that "2001" is one of your favorites.
Ok difference is I’m in California and you’re in the Arab gulf so results may vary. Sccit is coming over in an hour so I’ll have him film me approach random strangers. Let’s try it out
The full story is it was supposed to be called Chronic 2000, Suge beat him to the punch. Dre changed it to Chronic 2001, but the lawyers felt actually calling it Chronic 2001 was too close to Chronic 2000 and could create confusion in the marketplace and actually give Suge more sales and possible lawsuit material, as Dre already had to sue Suge for having the Dre vocals originally on Chronic 2000 and he was forced to remove them. So, Dre's team creatively came up with the idea to put a Chronic leaf, followed by the '2001'. But make no mistake, the album was always supposed to be called Chronic 2001. On the song 'Light Speed' it they lyrics even say Chronic 2001.
Lets get back to real issue. Kuruption.Problem is quantity over quality.It should be one disc, a side is west coast and b side is east coast.I dont agree who says east coast disc was unnecessary.Because, before the east-west beef kurupt was mentioning he is an east coast rapper a few times. He was one of a few lyricists on the west coast and he was trying show his skills to east coast to gain respect to his pen. When you compare his lyrics on east disc with west disc. He is more lyrical, different flows and complexed rhyme shemes. So i understand why he came up with an east coast disc. But only a b side would be enough. Same as west disc, too many fillers.
I agree with infinite again. Album title could be smth else better than 2001. But i have more problem with the album cover. Is it suge knight's fault too? )))Although worst album cover and a confusing meaningless album title, the chronic 2001 (actually thats what everybody calls it that way instead 2001) was sooo fucking good to make people doesnt care about the cover or title.
Word.And notice, you even had to change the title to mention it at the forum. I often do the same thing too. I'll refer to it as "Dre's second solo". And like HighEyecue said, sometimes they say "Dre 2001" and sometimes they say, "Dr. Dre 2001".And also saying "2001" isn't actually like that futuristic. The first year of the new millenium is 2000. So if you want to give it millennium significance (which is a big deal) then you need to say 2000. Saying 2001 doesn't make it more futuristic. It just makes it more confusing.And yeah.. what's with the cover. It was like just plain black cover. And this is Dre we are talking about. If Dre doesn't have the idea then he finds the right guy with the right idea. They couldn't come up with any good idea for the title and cover—they just gave up after Suge punked him
was listening to the West Coast Disc last night and caught a Will Smith diss that I had almost forgotten aboutOn "Fresh" there's a line "You know I'm the rawest MC with it, Fuck jiggy nigga, I'm DP with it"DP as in Dogg Pound, Daz and Kurupt
naah .. the new millennium started on 2001can't start something on 0