It's August 21, 2025, 04:29:58 PM
Dre 2001^^What a horrible and confusing title. Released in 1999 and yet it's called 2001 cause Suge stole Dre's Chronic 2 title. But couldn't he of just called it like "Chronic—the Sequal" or some shit like that. It's not hard.
it's supposed to be "the chronic 2001"the album was originally to be titled "the chronic 2000" but suge got a wind of that and beat him to the punch classic suge rolling so dre went and called his "the chronic 2001" .. which was later shortened to "2001"
I remember when I first bought it and never knew what to call it, "2001", "Dr. Dre 2001" or "Chronic 2001"i mean it has the leaf right before the 2001 on the front cover so that's what I went with
yes, and we never really have figured out what to call it. It's almost like the album just doesn't get mentioned a lot of times, just because people don't know what to call it. Dre puts in all that hard work and then just blows off the title. Isn't he a perfectionist?And he's usually good at that kind of stuff. He saw Xzibit with a tattoo saying Restless, and was like "that's your album title".
Ima go with "efil4zaggin"... the fuck!!??
Yeah, which is horrible album title. "2001". Try using that in a conversation it will automatically cause confusion. "I like the 2001 tracks""Oh cool, yeah, that was a good year in music, Eastsidaz Dueces and Treys and Nas Stillmatic.""No, I'm talking about the album "2001" by Dr. Dre.""Dre didn't release an album in 2001"...it almost becomes like Abbot and Costello bit "who's on first"
Really? You don’t know the story behind this or you just trolling
I agree with infinite again. Album title could be smth else better than 2001. But i have more problem with the album cover. Is it suge knight's fault too? )))Although worst album cover and a confusing meaningless album title, the chronic 2001 (actually thats what everybody calls it that way instead 2001) was sooo fucking good to make people doesnt care about the cover or title.
What i know is yella writes it on a paper and he sees it in the mirror and says lets call it that way. Is there another story?
^^someone agrees with meAnd notice, you even had to change the title to mention it at the forum. I often do the same thing too. I'll refer to it as "Dre's second solo". And like HighEyecue said, sometimes they say "Dre 2001" and sometimes they say, "Dr. Dre 2001".And also saying "2001" isn't actually like that futuristic. The first year of the new millenium is 2000. So if you want to give it millennium significance (which is a big deal) then you need to say 2000. Saying 2001 doesn't make it more futuristic. It just makes it more confusing.And yeah.. what's with the cover. It was like just plain black cover. And this is Dre we are talking about. If Dre doesn't have the idea then he finds the right guy with the right idea. They couldn't come up with any good idea for the title and cover—they just gave up after Suge punked him
2001 is the new millennium