It's August 26, 2026, 03:21:02 PM
He's exactly right. AI been replacing sounds in music for years. Voices were the last sound needed for AI to replace. Unless you're using a live band on every track, you've already been using AI.
In a new interview with The New York Times alongside his longtime business partner Jimmy Iovine, Dr. Dre called AI a "new tool for creativity" and said he doesn't see it "as a threat."Dre also acknowledged that he is using AI in his own music, explaining that he views the technology "as a tool to see what it would do with what I just did."Interestingly enough, this is the exact opposite of what legendary Dj Quik had to say about the usage of AI in music."It's a total violation of culture. It's appropriation. You can't recreate somebody that's still here doing what they do.Don't use my stuff because I know that computer is not gonna have my nuances. I watch AI programs on YouTube and they mispronounce words. It ain't human.I'd rather have bad human material than good AI material. How bout that"
Dre also acknowledged that he is using AI in his own music, explaining that he views the technology "as a tool to see what it would do with what I just did."
there's a difference between plug-ins and AI just because something isn't live doesn't make it AI
It's semantics at this point, but the concept is still valid. You're using a computer program to replicate a sound that would normally be produced and created by a human. Now granted, AI isn't building the whole concept and idea of a song from scratch, but telling a computer to replicate a sound exactly how you want it with no chance of human error or variance is most definitely a form of AI.
i get where u coming from but still difference
Appreciate the constructive discussion, but we can agree to disagree on this. You showing me an AI generated caption explaining AI isn't going to change the basic crux of my argument.
I thought it was a known fact that he used AI on tgat Tom Petty track