Tech breaks down some concepts used by the US govt to fool its people Vol. 1

[King Tech Quadafi]

No pussy, its more like 10 years ago you gave some lil boy some guns so he could kill this other kid you didnt like. Then once homeboy wasnt following your orders to your satisfaction u use the same guns you gave him as an excuse to fight him. All this over a suspicion that these guns still exist, and even if they did, these guns wouldnt even prick your skin.

[Woodrow]

No pussy, its more like 10 years ago you gave some lil boy some guns so he could kill this other kid you didnt like. Then once homeboy wasnt following your orders to your satisfaction u use the same guns you gave him as an excuse to fight him. All this over a suspicion that these guns still exist, and even if they did, these guns wouldnt even prick your skin.

Worst... Analogy... Ever...

[smerlus]

No pussy

now i see why you're an angry ass dude

[King Tech Quadafi]

No pussy, its more like 10 years ago you gave some lil boy some guns so he could kill this other kid you didnt like. Then once homeboy wasnt following your orders to your satisfaction u use the same guns you gave him as an excuse to fight him. All this over a suspicion that these guns still exist, and even if they did, these guns wouldnt even prick your skin.

Worst... Analogy... Ever...

I disagree carnaal.....

"10 years ago you gave some lil boy some guns so he could kill this other kid you didnt like"

more like 15 yrs, but America funds Saddam vs Iran

"Then once homeboy wasnt following your orders to your satisfaction u use the same guns you gave him as an excuse to fight him"

- fighting Iran good, fighting Kuwait? Bad.
- "He is a monstrous dictator who gassed his own people"
^ The people were gassed when he was a US ally, and many of the equipment was provided by the US, this same incident is used bu Bush to justify this war

"All this over a suspicion that these guns still exist, and even if they did, these guns wouldnt even prick your skin."

The suspicion part is correct because the existence of weapons was never guaranteed. Second, any weaponry Saddam does have is 1980 era chemical weaponry which is obsolete now.

So, the analogy is perfect. I just proved it.

[Woodrow]

So now you're a expert on chemical weapons and the exact amount that saddam had?

You moron...

[Don Rizzle]

exactly all chemical and biological weapons expire in 3 to 5 years. where did u hear that?? maybe some will not be effective anymore but i'm sure lots will still be deadly

plus to the arguments about no weapons being found. it hasn't been proved they were not there, but it has been proved they were there, and there was inteligance to say they were seeking wmd materials in particular nuclear

[Trauma-san]

VOTE DEMACRAT

[Woodrow]

LOL!

[King Tech Quadafi]

So now you're a expert on chemical weapons and the exact amount that saddam had?

You moron...

Unlike you, I actually peeped what people like Hans Blix, Scott Riotter and Mohamed El Barahei have to say

[King Tech Quadafi]

plus to the arguments about no weapons being found. it hasn't been proved they were not there, but it has been proved they were there, and there was inteligance to say they were seeking wmd materials in particular nuclear

By your logic nothing in life is certain, the truth could not be any closer to your face and you would still find a way to deny it

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

No pussy

now i see why you're an angry ass dude

LMFAO