It's August 28, 2025, 01:58:23 PM
Quote from: Antonio on August 10, 2004, 07:51:54 AMMatter of fact Malone's Lakers eliminated Duncan's San Antonio and Garnett's Minnesota last year, thanx to Malone's defence. I didnt find it annoying, i've found it exciting. lol. the only difference is Duncan and Garnett OWN their teams, while the Lakers were owned by two players, and none of them was called Malone. Malone on the Lakers is like Hoiberg on the Wolves, lmao.btw: isnt this the topic that was "deleted"? LMAO.
Matter of fact Malone's Lakers eliminated Duncan's San Antonio and Garnett's Minnesota last year, thanx to Malone's defence. I didnt find it annoying, i've found it exciting.
Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on August 10, 2004, 10:34:27 AMQuote from: Antonio on August 10, 2004, 07:51:54 AMMatter of fact Malone's Lakers eliminated Duncan's San Antonio and Garnett's Minnesota last year, thanx to Malone's defence. I didnt find it annoying, i've found it exciting. lol. the only difference is Duncan and Garnett OWN their teams, while the Lakers were owned by two players, and none of them was called Malone. Malone on the Lakers is like Hoiberg on the Wolves, lmao.btw: isnt this the topic that was "deleted"? LMAO.That's true...but the big reason Lakers beat Wolves was BECuASE of malone...Twolves had no one to stop him. Gary or Kobe would drive and Malone would be left wide open to reciece a pass and score easy jump shots..AND HE ALMOST NEVER MISSES THOSE. I saw that over and over agian in that series, it was sad
I wonder what's the odds of Rush playing point guard, 'cause my man is too good to be on the bench any longer, and I don't see him getting much playing time off Kobe.
The change they made Friday was really fucking whack...Why the hell did the Lakers agree to that?
But wasn't the trade already done?