It's August 29, 2025, 03:01:16 AM
Quote from: soopadoopaflykid on August 22, 2004, 05:48:57 PMI was suprised it even sold that much the first week. For a westcost record they did pretty good cuz who else on the westcoast sold that lately on there first week I think only westside connection this year and thats it. Also if you ever notice how tvt's first single dont ever make it that big but the second one or even the third one is a hit. Give 213 time and they might be able to sale and possibly even go platiumThats true. Look at Ying Yang Twinz last album, first single "Naggin" did very little, and then the second and third singles "Salt Shaker" and "Whats Happinin" blew the fuck up. Then Lil Jon, first single "I Dont Give A Fuck" did kinda well, then "Get Low" was song of the year.
I was suprised it even sold that much the first week. For a westcost record they did pretty good cuz who else on the westcoast sold that lately on there first week I think only westside connection this year and thats it. Also if you ever notice how tvt's first single dont ever make it that big but the second one or even the third one is a hit. Give 213 time and they might be able to sale and possibly even go platium
Hmmm. Check your statistics, I just checked RIAA.com, and Michaels album was certified Platinum @ the beginning of december, then Double Plat, January 25th, 2002. It was released October 30th, 2001, less than 3 months earlier, making my rough number of 2 months correct. So.... that's where YOU'RE wrong, and I'd appreciate an apology not only for your mistake, but for your audacity of accussing me of making a mistake.
Quote from: .:LiquidSwords:. on August 21, 2004, 10:05:45 PMc'mon its a good album considering how much shit sucks now adays... i mean you couldnt be expecting a classic from them NOW... No. But i was expecting an album as good as the last Warren G one. And Nate is still hot. It's Snoop who totally fucked it with his stupid producers and his wack rap performances.
c'mon its a good album considering how much shit sucks now adays... i mean you couldnt be expecting a classic from them NOW...
QuoteHmmm. Check your statistics, I just checked RIAA.com, and Michaels album was certified Platinum @ the beginning of december, then Double Plat, January 25th, 2002. It was released October 30th, 2001, less than 3 months earlier, making my rough number of 2 months correct. So.... that's where YOU'RE wrong, and I'd appreciate an apology not only for your mistake, but for your audacity of accussing me of making a mistake. get your calculator out:weekly sales for michael jacksons invinsible before it fell off the charts:1. 381,6112. 192,9523. 178,5834. 174,4765. 112,7656. 106,7677. 121,9028. 118,9459. 51,50410. 46,42811. 35,08512. 32,80113. 39,24414. 30,53615. 28,56716. less than 32,264 (he fell off the chart)17. 27,960 (this was the last week he showed on the chartsthat's 4 months there and he isn't double platinum, riaa sometimes certifies based on what the company tells them, so more than likely what you read was a statistic based on what he shipped at the time, peace.
We are often asked why we don’t just use sales figures from SoundScan. SoundScan measures over-the-counter sales at music retail locations, while the RIAA®'s certification levels are based on unit shipments (minus returns) from manufacturers to a wide range of accounts, including non-retail record clubs, mail order houses, specialty stores, units shipped for Internet fulfillment or direct marketing sales, such as TV-advertised albums.