It's May 12, 2024, 12:02:18 AM
Quote from: Lincoln The Reform-A-Tory on February 07, 2005, 09:25:09 AMDamn, a lot of negativity considering one of the greatest artists of all time played some great songs.I wouldn't let it get to you. This is coming from people that would rather see some God awful rapper do the Superbowl and call it amazing (rappers suck live). Not that I think it was mind blowing, but it was light years better than last year's. It's all Springsteen's fault, he keeps turning down the offer to play.
Damn, a lot of negativity considering one of the greatest artists of all time played some great songs.
and i cant wait till he starts his USA tour, im 100% going...
id rather see tits and ass over that boring show. last time i checked it was 2005 not 1965.
i don't know how you guys could say that the halftime show was crap....i thought that shit was bad ass, especially when he played hey jude
the half time show was fuckin great!one of my buddies didn't like it..but he's the same fag who loves Ciara music and thinks its "hard"
Quote from: Ðøšïå on February 06, 2005, 07:39:43 PMyeh. lame ass half time show. jsut about as lame as the commercialsword
yeh. lame ass half time show. jsut about as lame as the commercials
no fuckin way I was watching that. 15 drunk guys watching football......none of us wanted to see Paul McCartney's old ass. We just put it on mute. It would have been better with a hot chick doin the halftime show. I'm not hating on Paul, but like dude said above, this is 2005, Paul McCartney has no place at the superbowl.