It's May 28, 2024, 06:24:37 AM
Total Members Voted: 24
Quote from: eS El Duque on May 30, 2005, 01:35:56 PMKobe>Lebron>>Wade>>>>>Carmelo
Kobe>Lebron>>Wade>>>>>Carmelo
eS El Duque... numbers are not everything... if they were KG would be MVP again. Wade should've had some major numbers this year? lol what NBA were u watching this year?! Wade shouldve done more with shaq? He is in his second season, give him a go ffs...
Quote from: Antonio on May 30, 2005, 06:25:24 PMQuote from: eS El Duque on May 30, 2005, 01:35:56 PMKobe>Lebron>>Wade>>>>>CarmeloI think there's a greater difference between Kobe and LeBron than there is between Carmelo and LeBron...
Quote from: E. J. Rizo on May 29, 2005, 10:00:18 AMQuote from: 7even the Annoyed One on May 28, 2005, 06:29:53 PMMaybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.I'd expect that outta 7even, but ejrizo? I'm disappointed.
Quote from: 7even the Annoyed One on May 28, 2005, 06:29:53 PMMaybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.
Maybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.
as for the guy who said it was shaqs team....i guess we shouldve gave shaq the ball in the fourth quarter in all those close games in the playoffs huh...i think we would have one championship....it shouldve been brian shaw or rick fox taking those shots.....kobe saved shaq's ass everytime down the stretch. lemme give u some reasons why d wade is not on kobe's level yetkobe's been in the league for nine years, wade 2kobe has three championships, wade 0 (regardless if he had shaq, shaq wouldnt have won shit without kobe, kobe wouldnt have won shit without shaq)kobe actually has a perimeter shot so to even say wade is a perimeter game is bullshit.wade is quicker than kobe because he is smaller, but as quick as wade is , i would say kobe is one of the quickest in the league.wade is at the top thoughkobe has penetration skills as does wade. but the difference is kobe can be triple teamed at times. shaq takes the attention off of wade. so wade is free to do anything, but yet kobe averaged more point than wade and about the same assists with all the focus of the defense being on kobe. if wade had the same attention kobe gets on the defensive end, trust me buddy it would be a whole different story.if u guys watched all the laker games this season, u haters would know what im talking about. that dude is amazing....and for u guys that say ima kobe dickrider, no im a kobe bryant fan. even if my argument is for kobe. give me proof that what i said is wrong
Quote from: OneHittaSpitta on May 30, 2005, 07:42:05 AMQuote from: Now_Im_Blowed on May 29, 2005, 06:13:08 PMQuote from: OneHittaSpitta on May 29, 2005, 05:34:35 PMQuote from: Antonio on May 29, 2005, 04:04:58 PMWho denied what? so getting rid of Shaq was a good move then? lolMeanwhile, Kobe will be on top of things, and I'm willing to bet you on that...lol u should be in charge of all the lakers player moves with blind gambling like that...Blind gambling? What's one word to describe the Heat if they don't win the championship this season? You guesses it...DECLINE. And the Lakers? They're easily on an uprise...Think about it, it's not that hard.
Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on May 29, 2005, 06:13:08 PMQuote from: OneHittaSpitta on May 29, 2005, 05:34:35 PMQuote from: Antonio on May 29, 2005, 04:04:58 PMWho denied what? so getting rid of Shaq was a good move then? lolMeanwhile, Kobe will be on top of things, and I'm willing to bet you on that...lol u should be in charge of all the lakers player moves with blind gambling like that...
Quote from: OneHittaSpitta on May 29, 2005, 05:34:35 PMQuote from: Antonio on May 29, 2005, 04:04:58 PMWho denied what? so getting rid of Shaq was a good move then? lolMeanwhile, Kobe will be on top of things, and I'm willing to bet you on that...
Quote from: Antonio on May 29, 2005, 04:04:58 PMWho denied what? so getting rid of Shaq was a good move then? lol
Who denied what?
do u think shaq was worth 30 mil this year??? even if they wouldve made the playoffs with shaq this year....what would happen two years after that when shaq cant do anymore....what superstar are u going to sign with no cap space?? and he comes fatter and fatter each season not to mention the the vacations he takes off "company time" or where he flips the switch at the end of the season when its too late. the lakers were smart because they thought about the future....were not SUPPOSED to win the title every year at one point in time you have to rebuild just like the bulls a\were. its inevitable but what they can prevent is the state the bulls were in not too long ago. they were at the bottom of the league after jordan left. they are BARELY gettin back into the playoffs right now after 7 years. they let pippen go so they had to go into a total rebuilding mode. this is something the lakers dont wanna do. people are saying keep shaq keep shaq but we would be like the bulls when shaq retires because we cant sign any players. with kobe signed all we are missing is a few parts of the puzzle dont u think? is better to be missing a few pieces of the puzzle then to not have a puzzle at all
oh cool man everyone has their opinion...no sweat....by the way u said get a new starting 5 u would only get role player or borderline superstars....thats the clippers!!i wouldnt want that....
Quote from: krazykokonutz on June 04, 2005, 12:10:26 PMoh cool man everyone has their opinion...no sweat....by the way u said get a new starting 5 u would only get role player or borderline superstars....thats the clippers!!i wouldnt want that....Seriously...At least they have Kobe, a proven great who hasn't even reached his prime, to build a team around...Imagine how bad the Lakers would have been if Shaq AND Kobe were gone...Trading Kobe would be LA's biggest mistake ever. Why the FUCK would you trade the best player in the league? Who can they get for Kobe? Even if they got the best deal possible, lets say something like Kevin Garnett, Latrell Sprewell, and Wally Sczerbiak for Kobe, they still wouldn't have been good this year...Kobe is the way to go. Anybody would love to have Kobe Bryant as a player to build around...Why someone would trade a player like that is beyond me.