Author Topic: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bones!!!  (Read 482 times)

Woodrow

The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bones!!!
« on: April 18, 2002, 09:15:11 AM »
I was listening to the snoop advance today, and I was thinking that the reason that track wasnt on Bones, was becasue it had Marvin Gaye on it.

Do you guys remember how much Eric Sermon had to pay to have Marvin on Music? Something like a quarter of a million dollars. I bet that It would have cost a lot of money for that song to be released, so snoop just said fuck it. I mean, It wasnt going to be a single, or anything like that, so it was probably more economical for him to not release it.

I wanna hear comments!

-Engelwood
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Big BpG

Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2002, 09:52:41 AM »
Quote
I was listening to the snoop advance today, and I was thinking that the reason that track wasnt on Bones, was becasue it had Marvin Gaye on it.

Do you guys remember how much Eric Sermon had to pay to have Marvin on Music? Something like a quarter of a million dollars. I bet that It would have cost a lot of money for that song to be released, so snoop just said fuck it. I mean, It wasnt going to be a single, or anything like that, so it was probably more economical for him to not release it.

I wanna hear comments!

-Engelwood


Thats Genius!

-Big BpG
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Nima - Dubcnn.com

Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2002, 10:07:33 AM »
good thinkin!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ExZit

  • CPG Recordz CEO
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2443
  • Karma: 34
  • COMPTONS MOST WANTED
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2002, 10:09:56 AM »
could be true..

i mean, its not a bad song..
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2002, 10:12:00 AM »
Quote
I was listening to the snoop advance today, and I was thinking that the reason that track wasnt on Bones, was becasue it had Marvin Gaye on it.

Do you guys remember how much Eric Sermon had to pay to have Marvin on Music? Something like a quarter of a million dollars. I bet that It would have cost a lot of money for that song to be released, so snoop just said fuck it. I mean, It wasnt going to be a single, or anything like that, so it was probably more economical for him to not release it.

I wanna hear comments!

-Engelwood


Yeah, this is almost certainly true.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2002, 10:12:39 AM »
EUREKA!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2002, 10:15:10 AM »
Quote
EUREKA!


HELL YEAH
 

Woodrow

Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2002, 10:17:57 AM »
ka-pow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-Engelwood
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Sir Hambone

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1633
  • Karma: 2
  • Hambone 2 The Dome, Hard As Stone,Took the Throne
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2002, 10:42:15 AM »
Exacta-Mundo!

:-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Murrow

Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2002, 10:55:46 AM »
OH MY GOD DUDE!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Hittman

  • Guest
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #10 on: April 18, 2002, 11:02:42 AM »
Calm Down People....  :o
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Doggystylin

  • Guest
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #11 on: April 18, 2002, 11:50:43 AM »
Quote
Calm Down People....  :o


LOL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ROCCY

  • Guest
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #12 on: April 18, 2002, 12:33:52 PM »
yeah..Smart..And LoL@ Logic  ;D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2002, 12:43:09 PM »
Ka-BOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

-Engelwood
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

.:Hercy Buggz:.

  • The Soul Brotha
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7760
  • Thanked: 101 times
  • Karma: 281
  • Time For Sumthin New
Re: The reason why #2 on the advance wasnt on bone
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2002, 12:52:30 PM »
this make no sens cause the guy is keep sayin jimmy Bones at the end
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »