It's October 17, 2025, 02:07:02 PM
nah i think "2001" had a more negative impact cuz it showed that if you keep the same formula over & over again, you will succeed. it also made gangsta rap even more acceptable in pop culture imo.
This is something I've talked about with other people I know before, but I figured maybe we should talk about this, since we are DubCNN, after all.(2.) Building on the above, "The Chronic" pretty much watered down gangsta rap by substracting all of the socio-political sentiments that N.W.A. and Ice Cube and previous groups had shown - no more stuff about police brutality, no more anger at Uncle Sam, no attempts to show both the ups and downs of gang life, etc.
"The Chronic" marked the point where detractors stopped making that distinction and would say, "I hate RAP, period." Ignorant as it sounds, it's easy to understand where they're coming from.
You make some very strong points, but I still have to disagree. i dont think it changed rap as much as it changed the rap that was accessible. There were still artists that spoke on the things that you said were missing in The Chronic, but the big companies were no longer looking to release that type of music as much. It did introduce gangsta themes to a pop audience, but pop is pop regardless and will always be watered down regardless of the general themes it touches on.As a general rule I dont think the hardore and the realest shit ever gets to the public because thats not what they want. Pop audiences want feel good/party music, not tales of the downtrodden or disenfranchised. At first, the NWA's of the world were embraced, I think, mostly because white kids (save the hate mail white people, you know it at least partially true) enjoyed pissing their parents off. Where I think the negative impact came from, is when people who were not from the streets jumped on the bandwagon and started to interpret their own version of the "hood lifestyle" without ever even seeing it anywhere other than gangsta flicks like Boys N The Hood and New Jack City, thereby removing any credibility or realness from the music. Thats why people in the streets almost never embrace the shit thats on the radio or BET, etc. Like I said though, you make some strong arguments and you may be right, but I just disagree. Where I do agree with you though is it did create a bunch of fake ass bandwagoners who actually did have a negative impact, through no direct action of Dre, because while there may have been missing elements of the streets on The Chronic, at least everything was authentic. Thats just my pennies...
Quote from: Bigg $amo on January 11, 2006, 09:16:05 AMnah i think "2001" had a more negative impact cuz it showed that if you keep the same formula over & over again, you will succeed. it also made gangsta rap even more acceptable in pop culture imo. the same formula ? I assume you talk about the lyrics.
i wouldn't blame this on the chronic. look at "efil4zaggin". all the socio-political sentiments left n.w.a. when ice cube left n.w.a. they went from "a bitch iz a bitch" and "i ain't the one", which, while not positive represented a level of playful struggly between men and women; to "to kill a hooker" and "one less bitch" where they are attempting to rape and kill women.
fuck the detractors. seriously, why bother worrying about what the distractors say? who are these detractors that their opinion matters anyway?
and you forget, "the chronic" marked the shift where hip hop moved towards being the top selling genre of music atleast in america. hip hop now defines everything that is hip and popular. hip hop is exploited by all sorts of huge corporations for advertising and marketting. "the chronic" paved the way for all of that. if anything it only shows the hypocrisy of the culture and the detractors as a whole. you look at a guy like eminem and you realize that "the detractors" simply wanted a guy rhyming about cornball shit like trailer parks and mushrooms to bring them to the table. i don't think you've fully touched on your point. "the chronic" paved the way for guys like jay-z to be part owners of the nets. building office/business/shopping complexes in brooklyn and moving the team to brooklyn. that's insanely good. mind boggling. jay-z is a guy that rhymes about being an ex crack dealer. you have a guy like 50, a guy that i don't pay that much attention to, but a guy that seems to be doing alot."the chronic" opened the door to a lot of great things for hip-hop. expanded the amount of money hip-hop generated and the artists as well in some cases. we all know who makes the billions vs the millions. and the millions vs the thousands.the only argument you have, that i see, is that gangsta shit has had a detrimental effect on black culture, black communities, and black consciousness. that is something i feel you didn't fully touch on.
^^^Well would you also say the same about artists like Curtis Mayfield who built their careers around the same exact themes?
What I mean is that these topics have been prevalent long before Dre, and Dre grew up on the Curtis Mayfields of his era, so if Dre indirectly had a negative impact like you say, then wouldnt Curtis mayfield also been indirectly responsible for these same problems?