It's April 27, 2024, 02:17:02 AM
We were a better team last year, and by the way the Lakers injury problems werent a tenth as bad as the pacers. When we had Artest he missed 90% of the games, JO was out almost half the year, Tinsley was hurt half the year, Bender had to retire, Foster was out almost half the year. Give me a fuckin break retard the Pacers used over 35 starting lineups last year cause they had to and they still went as far as the Lakers went. And LMAO at you shrugging off Fred Jones, dude is easily one of the best bench players in the league who would start on many teams. It is a known fact that the Pacers are one of the deepest teams in the league while the Lakers arent.
Tinsley > ParkerKobe > S. JacksonPeja > OdomJO > BrownFoster > MihmPlus are bench is twice as good and yes Phil might be the best coach ever, but anytime a discussion of the best coaches in the league comes up Carlisle is always mentioned at the top of the list. Pacers >Lakers
In the end though, It's Kobe's team, and I think he'd have the final word, not Sccit.
Quote from: M Dogg on June 15, 2006, 05:39:34 PM In the end though, It's Kobe's team, and I think he'd have the final word, not Sccit.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 15, 2006, 03:45:45 PMQuote from: 7even says: Fuck what Simon says. on June 15, 2006, 03:25:32 PMWell, contender teams won't make such a big trade. Only unhappy teams would do such a chemistry-ruining trade.. you think Mavs would trade Dirk for KG, or Suns trade Amare for KG, or Spurs trade Duncan for KG? Fuck no.Were talking about teams like the Lakers or Kings, who are close to contending...That's the kind of team KG will get traded to if he does get traded. Exchanging Jermaine O'Neal's unhappiness with KG's unhappiness simply won't work. Indiana is not a desirable team to be on right now, and neither is Minnesota. That wasn't the story about 3-4 years ago, but now they want out...PeACeLMFAO, So your saying the Lakers are contenders and the Pacers arent??
Quote from: 7even says: Fuck what Simon says. on June 15, 2006, 03:25:32 PMWell, contender teams won't make such a big trade. Only unhappy teams would do such a chemistry-ruining trade.. you think Mavs would trade Dirk for KG, or Suns trade Amare for KG, or Spurs trade Duncan for KG? Fuck no.Were talking about teams like the Lakers or Kings, who are close to contending...That's the kind of team KG will get traded to if he does get traded. Exchanging Jermaine O'Neal's unhappiness with KG's unhappiness simply won't work. Indiana is not a desirable team to be on right now, and neither is Minnesota. That wasn't the story about 3-4 years ago, but now they want out...PeACe
Well, contender teams won't make such a big trade. Only unhappy teams would do such a chemistry-ruining trade.. you think Mavs would trade Dirk for KG, or Suns trade Amare for KG, or Spurs trade Duncan for KG? Fuck no.
Kobe <<<<<<<<<< S. Jackson
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 15, 2006, 05:34:41 PMKobe <<<<<<<<<< S. Jackson
Quote from: Spicemuthafuckin1 on June 15, 2006, 05:05:11 PMWe were a better team last year, and by the way the Lakers injury problems werent a tenth as bad as the pacers. When we had Artest he missed 90% of the games, JO was out almost half the year, Tinsley was hurt half the year, Bender had to retire, Foster was out almost half the year. Give me a fuckin break retard the Pacers used over 35 starting lineups last year cause they had to and they still went as far as the Lakers went. And LMAO at you shrugging off Fred Jones, dude is easily one of the best bench players in the league who would start on many teams. It is a known fact that the Pacers are one of the deepest teams in the league while the Lakers arent.LOL. You're a joke, man...Explain to me how they were "better" last year with a worse record in the east...Please. Artest isn't part of your team, get over it. Bender has barely contributed shit to the franchise since he was drafted. JO and Tinsley were hurt, I'll give you that, but try having your most reliable back-up obtain an injury in the first few weeks causing him to sit out the whole season. Try having your projected starting point guard and only veteran leader start the season injured, only to later realize he's going to sit out the whole season. Try having one of your few bigs and a coach favorite who understands the system sit out the whole season after the first 2 games of the season because of back problems...Try having your most developed rookie start the season 6 months late because he had to have a heart-valve replaced...I can keep going too. The bottom line is, with or without injury, Lakers proved to be a better team than the Pacers last year, not just by faring better in the regular season in a tougher conference, but also faring better in the playoffs vs. a tougher opponent. Fred Jones is decent at best. Kareem Rush > Fred Jones. Quote from: Spicemuthafuckin1 on June 15, 2006, 05:05:11 PMTinsley > ParkerKobe > S. JacksonPeja > OdomJO > BrownFoster > MihmPlus are bench is twice as good and yes Phil might be the best coach ever, but anytime a discussion of the best coaches in the league comes up Carlisle is always mentioned at the top of the list. Pacers >LakersOkay, PLEASE tell me that was a joke. If not, you're hilariously dumber than I initially thought.Tinsley < ParkerKobe >>>>>>>>>> S. JacksonPeja <<< OdomJO >>>>> BrownFoster << MihmAnd that's without taking into account how much younger and less experienced the Lakers are. And what coach is running the team, how long their systems have been implamented, etc...Like I said, PLEASE bring this thread up in a year so we can all laugh at you.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 15, 2006, 05:34:41 PMQuote from: Spicemuthafuckin1 on June 15, 2006, 05:05:11 PMWe were a better team last year, and by the way the Lakers injury problems werent a tenth as bad as the pacers. When we had Artest he missed 90% of the games, JO was out almost half the year, Tinsley was hurt half the year, Bender had to retire, Foster was out almost half the year. Give me a fuckin break retard the Pacers used over 35 starting lineups last year cause they had to and they still went as far as the Lakers went. And LMAO at you shrugging off Fred Jones, dude is easily one of the best bench players in the league who would start on many teams. It is a known fact that the Pacers are one of the deepest teams in the league while the Lakers arent.LOL. You're a joke, man...Explain to me how they were "better" last year with a worse record in the east...Please. Artest isn't part of your team, get over it. Bender has barely contributed shit to the franchise since he was drafted. JO and Tinsley were hurt, I'll give you that, but try having your most reliable back-up obtain an injury in the first few weeks causing him to sit out the whole season. Try having your projected starting point guard and only veteran leader start the season injured, only to later realize he's going to sit out the whole season. Try having one of your few bigs and a coach favorite who understands the system sit out the whole season after the first 2 games of the season because of back problems...Try having your most developed rookie start the season 6 months late because he had to have a heart-valve replaced...I can keep going too. The bottom line is, with or without injury, Lakers proved to be a better team than the Pacers last year, not just by faring better in the regular season in a tougher conference, but also faring better in the playoffs vs. a tougher opponent. Fred Jones is decent at best. Kareem Rush > Fred Jones. Quote from: Spicemuthafuckin1 on June 15, 2006, 05:05:11 PMTinsley > ParkerKobe > S. JacksonPeja > OdomJO > BrownFoster > MihmPlus are bench is twice as good and yes Phil might be the best coach ever, but anytime a discussion of the best coaches in the league comes up Carlisle is always mentioned at the top of the list. Pacers >LakersOkay, PLEASE tell me that was a joke. If not, you're hilariously dumber than I initially thought.Tinsley < ParkerKobe >>>>>>>>>> S. JacksonPeja <<< OdomJO >>>>> BrownFoster << MihmAnd that's without taking into account how much younger and less experienced the Lakers are. And what coach is running the team, how long their systems have been implamented, etc...Like I said, PLEASE bring this thread up in a year so we can all laugh at you. Dont worry I cant wait to bring this up in a year when The Pacers are by far the better team. Looking at it completely unbiased this is how it goes,Tinsley > Parker (Smush is young but his game isnt quite with jamal's yet)Kobe > S. Jackson (Jackson scores 16 a game so he's no slouch but yeah kobe's the best)Peja = Odom (Both good players but either have played to thier potential)JO > Brown (Not even close)Foster > Mihm (Foster averages almost 10 boards a game and knows his role def better than mihm)Eat a dick bitch
Home
Help
Login
Register
Print
