It's June 03, 2024, 07:04:29 AM
Total Members Voted: 10
Quote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:24:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:19:01 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?I've been to more countries in the middle east AND europe than u and i can tell u that anybody can recognize a man u jersey from a mile away in those regions...and the only reason they might recognize a laker jersey from a mile away would b the color giving it away...what ur saying only applies to the u.s.,not the whole world...i dunno any place that wouldn't recognize a Laker jersey...however, i do know of places that wouldnt recognize a Man U jersey. Lakers are a global symbol for basketball, ya feel me? also, who is more recognizable from Man U than Kobe Bryant?
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:19:01 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?I've been to more countries in the middle east AND europe than u and i can tell u that anybody can recognize a man u jersey from a mile away in those regions...and the only reason they might recognize a laker jersey from a mile away would b the color giving it away...what ur saying only applies to the u.s.,not the whole world...
Quote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?
^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:27:15 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:24:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:19:01 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?I've been to more countries in the middle east AND europe than u and i can tell u that anybody can recognize a man u jersey from a mile away in those regions...and the only reason they might recognize a laker jersey from a mile away would b the color giving it away...what ur saying only applies to the u.s.,not the whole world...i dunno any place that wouldn't recognize a Laker jersey...however, i do know of places that wouldnt recognize a Man U jersey. Lakers are a global symbol for basketball, ya feel me? also, who is more recognizable from Man U than Kobe Bryant?beckham...i already told u...more people know about beckham than kobe...and agian,what u said only applies to the u.s....beckham is famous in the u.s. cause he kicks it wit snoop and fucks a spice girl,i get it...but he was still more famous than kobe b4 he came to the u.s.(and b4 he was smashin posh spice)...maybe the average joe in america didn't know about beckham till lets say 4 years ago...but america isn't the world...
Quote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:27:50 PMif they have more fans=more recognition,thats common sense ...=100% false. go read my Cam'ron/Soulja Boy analogy again so you can see where I'm comin from.
if they have more fans=more recognition,thats common sense ...
Quote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:31:44 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:27:15 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:24:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:19:01 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?I've been to more countries in the middle east AND europe than u and i can tell u that anybody can recognize a man u jersey from a mile away in those regions...and the only reason they might recognize a laker jersey from a mile away would b the color giving it away...what ur saying only applies to the u.s.,not the whole world...i dunno any place that wouldn't recognize a Laker jersey...however, i do know of places that wouldnt recognize a Man U jersey. Lakers are a global symbol for basketball, ya feel me? also, who is more recognizable from Man U than Kobe Bryant?beckham...i already told u...more people know about beckham than kobe...and agian,what u said only applies to the u.s....beckham is famous in the u.s. cause he kicks it wit snoop and fucks a spice girl,i get it...but he was still more famous than kobe b4 he came to the u.s.(and b4 he was smashin posh spice)...maybe the average joe in america didn't know about beckham till lets say 4 years ago...but america isn't the world...forget about beckham (and i still dont think hes more recognizable than kobe)...who from manchester united RIGHT NOW has a bigger name? anyways, ima go hit a steezy ...well finish this discussion a lil later, son.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:30:35 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:27:50 PMif they have more fans=more recognition,thats common sense ...=100% false. go read my Cam'ron/Soulja Boy analogy again so you can see where I'm comin from.cam'ron has more fans than soulja boy?I doubt that...
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:34:26 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:31:44 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:27:15 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:24:55 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:19:01 PMQuote from: Ali Tha Great on November 02, 2008, 05:12:07 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:03:03 PM^we're talking about which name is more recognizable, not which sport has more fans...just because one product has more fans doesn't mean another product can't be more recognizable. Cam'ron has more fans than Soulja Boy, but does that mean he's more recognizable to the public? Lakers are a bigger name than any soccer team, believe that.lol...i was replying to antonio's post...and "Most popular" could mean "most watched", "most played" or "most revenue-generating."based on the number and size of stadiums around the world, the number of people who wear soccer merchandise, number of people who are aware of soccer, and the number of leagues/tournaments worldwide (The WORLD CUP, UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, THE SOUTH AMERICAN CUP, THE AMERICAN CUP, THE ASIAN CUP, 70 English league teams, 40 Italian league teams, 40 Spanish league teams) football ranks at the top of the list regardless the definition of "most popular" or "most recognizable"...don't u think the most popular sports franchise in the world would belong to the most popular sport?how can this not make sense to u?Once again, more people in the world will recognize a Laker jersey over a Manchester United jersey...more people in the world will recognize Kobe Bryant's name over any player on Manchester United. Cricket has far more fans than basketball. Cricket is STILL not a more recognizable sport...not by a long shot. How can this not make sense to you?I've been to more countries in the middle east AND europe than u and i can tell u that anybody can recognize a man u jersey from a mile away in those regions...and the only reason they might recognize a laker jersey from a mile away would b the color giving it away...what ur saying only applies to the u.s.,not the whole world...i dunno any place that wouldn't recognize a Laker jersey...however, i do know of places that wouldnt recognize a Man U jersey. Lakers are a global symbol for basketball, ya feel me? also, who is more recognizable from Man U than Kobe Bryant?beckham...i already told u...more people know about beckham than kobe...and agian,what u said only applies to the u.s....beckham is famous in the u.s. cause he kicks it wit snoop and fucks a spice girl,i get it...but he was still more famous than kobe b4 he came to the u.s.(and b4 he was smashin posh spice)...maybe the average joe in america didn't know about beckham till lets say 4 years ago...but america isn't the world...forget about beckham (and i still dont think hes more recognizable than kobe)...who from manchester united RIGHT NOW has a bigger name? anyways, ima go hit a steezy ...well finish this discussion a lil later, son.david beckham was on man u...what r u talking about?
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 02, 2008, 05:23:34 PMand no, most popular based on fans and most popular based on recognition is not one in the same...think about it, people who dont give a fuck about sports and don't consider themselves a fan of either sport have a right to recognition too. LOL.i didn't say there the same...i said they're tied together...if they have more fans=more recognition,thats common sense ...i didn't say they have to b a fan to know about the team...
and no, most popular based on fans and most popular based on recognition is not one in the same...think about it, people who dont give a fuck about sports and don't consider themselves a fan of either sport have a right to recognition too. LOL.
this may come as a suprise, but not alot of people outside of the US really give a fuck about the NBA
He went to Japan. LOL. Maybe they don't know the NBA there. It's probably the only country in the world tho.
Quote from: Antonio on November 03, 2008, 11:03:20 AMHe went to Japan. LOL. Maybe they don't know the NBA there. It's probably the only country in the world tho.if you read my post, you'd also see that I said every fucker in Japan was wearing a celtics hat/jersey/tracksuitthere's a difference between people knowing about the NBA and not giving a fuck about it
'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.