Author Topic: Dre and Paul McCartney  (Read 704 times)

forgotabout

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 127
  • Karma: 1
  • I love YaBB 1 Gold!
Dre and Paul McCartney
« on: February 25, 2002, 03:42:51 PM »
along time ago there was talk of dre working with the former beatle

has anything progressed in this situation
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

ZILLA THA GOODFELLA

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 6917
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: -97
  • www.servnu151.com + www.turfdout.com
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2002, 05:58:20 PM »
PUH
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »

REGGAE MEETS THE WEST BAY MIXTAPE IN STORES NOW !!

TRENCH TOWN HUSTLAZ - YOUNG N HUNGRY
COMING IN 2008.
FEATURING: SAN QUINN, THE JACKA (MOB FIGAZ), DUBEE, TELLY MAC (THA GAMBLAZ) MR. KEE, 10SION, LIL RIC, PROHOEZAK, ARSEN & MORE.

www.myspace.com/trenchtownhustlaz

YAYYYYYYYYYYYYY AREAAAAAAAAAAA.. WEST OF THE WATER! COME SEE US!!
 

Trauma-san

Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2002, 06:04:29 PM »
Paul's wife died about 3 years ago... Paul asked Dre to contribute a song to a tribute album of beatles cover songs being released to raise money for Breast Cancer charity, which is what killed Linda.  Now, I don't know how dre could do it... he could Produce a cover song I guess, but I'm not sure.  Dre's a big beatles fan (Eminem and Snoop are too, imagine that), so it should be interesting.  That would basically be Pop production though, there's no beats involved, just guitars and drums, so I don't know how Dre would go about producing it.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

4 KiN L

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
  • Karma: 1
  • Me Beamer...
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2002, 10:43:20 AM »
u know i really hate the beatles...but one thing i like is how people with so simple lyrics...so simple music...crap voices (the truth really) can be as famous as they were....and really respect that fact!! i can't believe someone with dre's ability to suply dope beats can be a fan of shite like that!! but then i guess it really is his choice!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Murrow

Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2002, 11:56:16 AM »
Quote
u know i really hate the beatles...but one thing i like is how people with so simple lyrics...so simple music...crap voices (the truth really) can be as famous as they were....and really respect that fact!! i can't believe someone with dre's ability to suply dope beats can be a fan of shite like that!! but then i guess it really is his choice!


I dislike The Beatles too.  I just think their image is too hunky dory and they are too plain as artists.  With their heads boppin side to side, holding those guitars the way they doo.  They seemed so manufactured, like robots as they played.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

infinite59

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2002, 02:07:03 AM »
Who are the Beatles?  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2002, 02:51:30 AM »
^ An English pop group that was popular during the 70's & 80's.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

infinite59

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2002, 02:58:19 AM »
Quote
^ An English pop group that was popular during the 70's & 80's.


They must not of been too dope, I ain't ever listened to them.  Probably some hippie white boys making protest music, lol.....Anyway, so when's that Royce the 5'9" shit dropping?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2002, 03:01:28 AM »
Quote
They must not of been too dope, I ain't ever listened to them.  Probably some hippie white boys making protest music, lol.....Anyway, so when's that Royce the 5'9" shit dropping?


Probably March... if I remember right.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

infinite59

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2002, 03:37:23 AM »
Quote


Probably March... if I remember right.


Yo.... were the Beatles that group with that lead singer called Mick Jagger?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

KVB

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2002, 04:04:56 AM »
Quote


Yo.... were the Beatles that group with that lead singer called Mick Jagger?


Exactly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Trauma-san

Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2002, 05:58:54 AM »
Simple lyrics, excuse my while I throw up.  LOL

The beatles, if ya don't know, started out like the Backstreet Boys, and grew into one of the most lyrically talented groups ever, I took a music appreciation class, and they're mentioned alongside Beethoven and Bach.  They were that great.  McCartney/Lennon is the greatest songwriting team of all time.  If you can look at them subjectively, you'll see they were the most talented group easily of the century.

They started out just writing love songs, in 1962.  They were good love songs, kinda like Usher, or somebody today.  For back then, it was good.  NOBODY was making real music, all music was doo-wop, or early rock from the states.  Little Richard, Elvis, etc. were king, and Motown was just starting with the supremes, and smokey robinson.  

Then, in 1965, John Lennon got the idea to write a song about his life.  He started writing real music, as opposed to music designed to make women cream.  He wrote "My Life", stll a love song, but all about his thoughts, his feelings.  He wrote "Norweigan wood" all about him cheating on his wife.  He wrote "Girl", about the same thing.  By 1967, every song the beatles were writing was superior to anything else on the radio, you can take one of their throwaway songs, and it'll be better than the best songs on other albums.

They're solely responsible for turning pop music into something more respected, unfortuantely since then we've gone backwards.  George Harrison invented the Wah Guitar, which made Hendrix famous.  John lennon was the first to talk rythmically in a song, paving the way for rap.  Paul McCartney came up with the idea of recording a drum beat, then looping it through the song , adding samples over it, which is hip hop 101.  Beatles were pretty much the first to cuss on record... they wre only around about 7 years, and put out 12 or so albums, along with 20 #1 songs, which still hasn't been topped by any group.  If you think their lyrics are simple they must be above your head, or you're not familiar with their later work.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Shallow

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Karma: 215
  • I never had a digital pic of myself before
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2002, 07:26:49 AM »
Well said Trauma.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Murrow

Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2002, 07:35:03 AM »
They were revolutionary, but I dont' think they were anything special besides starting these trends.  Sorry..
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

engelwood

  • Guest
Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2002, 08:30:20 AM »
Incognito, KVB, infinite59: Your comments are very ignorant...

Infinite59: Just because you haven’t listened to a group doesn’t make them any less impressive and revolutionary.

KVB: Have you ever listened to the Beatles? Or are you just speaking from ignorance? Their Debut record was in 1963.

Incognito: "They were revolutionary, but I don’t' think they were anything special besides starting these trends.  Sorry.. "

If you start a revolution, it is not just a "Trend" look closer at what trauma wrote... He dropped some knowledge on all of you.


I wish that before dismissing any other form of music, you all would at least give it a chance. The Beatles defined a generation. Kind of like what rap music is doing today, but they were one group.

-Engelwood
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »