« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
  
Go Down

Author Topic: 2001 is NOT a classic  (Read 3972 times)

techniec

  • Guest
2001 is NOT a classic
« on: July 15, 2001, 05:16:06 PM »
i hear alot of homies sayin 2001 is a classic, i dont know about yall but i dont think so,
i mean it is amazing, the best in a while, but too much tracks i was feeling, like big egos, murder inc, i mean they are not bad songs but they dont belong on a classic, perhaps it is a classic considering how it was produced, mixed and what not, but af for the music, too much tracks i didnt like

big egos
murder inc
forgot about dre (its a surprise but i hate it) >:(

peace
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2001, 05:21:37 PM »
we're not alone in this case critics people are with us... i think the source will try to change the mark and put a classic mark like the already did
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Sub_Z_Row

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2001, 05:31:54 PM »
i dont think its a classic either,the only songs i like on it are: #3-Fuck You,#4-Still D.R.E,#6-XXplosive,#7Whats The Difference,#10Forgot about dre,#11-next episode,and #22-the message

7 songs
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

DPGC2001

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2001, 05:32:30 PM »
I agree 2001 is not a classic...too many just ok songs on there...But the production is so dope...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2001, 05:55:44 PM »
I think you guys will change your minds in 3 years and notice that nothing like it came close to it from 1997-2002...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Big BpG

Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2001, 06:00:32 PM »
exactly... in a few years that album will still be in your player while others that came out around this time will just collect dust... a classic album doesn't have to CHANGE ANYTHING ... no music can... the chronic (original) is a classic because the topics and themes that were portrayed in the music were being ignored on the outside. On the otherhand, Nas's illmatic is a classic the same way 2001 is. The music is dope, the lyrics are dope and meaningfull and it was a success. Thats my two cents

-bpg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

West Coast Veteran

Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2001, 06:07:38 PM »
It's CLASSIC! Timless Album! It's Still In My Heavy Rotation...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

CWalker187

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2001, 06:10:01 PM »
Hell yeah...2001 was an above average album but nowhere near a classic. I am suprised people on this website are agreeing with you, last week I posted about Dre falling off and everyone jumped down my throat.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Dope Money Clean

Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2001, 06:17:51 PM »
i gotta say in the 20 years i been alive   2001 is the best album ive ever heard.......... i bump the Instrumentals version  daily.  if there is anything else as perfect as 2001  i wanna know........
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Sub_Z_Row

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2001, 06:22:25 PM »

Quote

Hell yeah...2001 was an above average album but nowhere near a classic. I am suprised people on this website are agreeing with you, last week I posted about Dre falling off and everyone jumped down my throat.

yea there are a lotta dre dick riders on the board
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2001, 06:24:13 PM »
yeah n some dead hoes too  ;D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Sub_Z_Row

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2001, 06:25:05 PM »
dead hoes.........?????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Nosak

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4805
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 1
  • Half Dogg,Half Monkey..Bitch! Donkey Kong
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2001, 06:28:01 PM »
dead hoe = death row
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Big BpG

Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2001, 06:29:59 PM »
lol hahahahahahahaha

where are the dead hoes... i only see live ones
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 

Sub_Z_Row

  • Guest
Re: 2001 is NOT a classic
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2001, 06:40:10 PM »
whats up wit everybody hatin on death row on this  board?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
Logged
 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
  
Go Up
« previous next »