It's June 16, 2024, 05:52:07 AM
Lakers2006-07 42-40 .5122005-06 45-37 .5492004-05 34-48 .415Overall 121-125 .492Suns2006-07 61-21 .7442005-06 54-28 .6592004-05 62-20 .756Overall 177-69 .720I don't know NIK, I'm looking at how well the Suns have done in the past 3 years in comparison to the Lakers and it's hard to sit here and think you're being rational when you say the Suns suck and that the Lakers are a better team. A better team should be well over .500. In the 2 times that the Lakers have made the Playoffs, the Suns bounced them each time in the 1st round. The Lakers were low on fire power, but they were still better? How so? How were they better? Their regular Season standings sure don't show it nor do they're performances in the Playoffs. I'm curious as to how you came up with that conclusion. What shows you the Lakers were a better team the past 2 seasons than the Suns?
give it a rest NIK.
^well fuck man you are saying Bynum is better than Amare haha. what do you expect me to do, you are the one that made the ridicolous statement.
I will be the first person to say that Amare is overated, but fact is it is obsurd to compare Bynum to Amare right now. Amare is a proven all star NIK, I know Bynum is extremely young so we have to wait but so far he hasnt done anything to warrant someone saying he is as good as bynum let alone D.Howard LOL. I dont know if I ever see Bynum scoring a whole lot in his career, he is way to one dimensional on the offensive side. NIK he has a bright future and has potential to maybe be a all star someday and thats a huge maybe.
I'd take Bynum over Amare right now. Better knees, non-gimmick offense, younger, higher ceiling.
he's got upside, but Amare's got a fwe years experience on him