It's June 16, 2024, 06:11:41 AM
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 09, 2008, 06:39:47 PMYea, your stupid point was that Boston was more aggressive...only your dumbass forgot to read the box score. The Lakers took more than twice as many shots in the paint. Boston wasn't more aggressive. Boston was ALLOWED more aggression...That's the whole point.No. You still need basic comprehension skills. My point was that LEON POWE individually got that many FTs because of his aggressive play. The Lakers had more fg attempts, so what? The vast majority of those were contested jump shots from 13'+ out. They didn't attack the basket like Boston (Powe in particular) did.
Yea, your stupid point was that Boston was more aggressive...only your dumbass forgot to read the box score. The Lakers took more than twice as many shots in the paint. Boston wasn't more aggressive. Boston was ALLOWED more aggression...That's the whole point.
Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 08:52:00 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 09, 2008, 06:39:47 PMYea, your stupid point was that Boston was more aggressive...only your dumbass forgot to read the box score. The Lakers took more than twice as many shots in the paint. Boston wasn't more aggressive. Boston was ALLOWED more aggression...That's the whole point.No. You still need basic comprehension skills. My point was that LEON POWE individually got that many FTs because of his aggressive play. The Lakers had more fg attempts, so what? The vast majority of those were contested jump shots from 13'+ out. They didn't attack the basket like Boston (Powe in particular) did.Are you this much of an idiot? READ WHAT THE FUCK I SAID. The Lakers took twice as many shots in the paint as Boston. THAT MEANS BOSTON WASN'T MORE AGGRESSIVE!! They were simply allowed to play more aggressive."durrrr...I watched the game and there was no discrepancy in the calls, DURRRRRHHHHH!"
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 10, 2008, 10:12:21 AMQuote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 08:52:00 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 09, 2008, 06:39:47 PMYea, your stupid point was that Boston was more aggressive...only your dumbass forgot to read the box score. The Lakers took more than twice as many shots in the paint. Boston wasn't more aggressive. Boston was ALLOWED more aggression...That's the whole point.No. You still need basic comprehension skills. My point was that LEON POWE individually got that many FTs because of his aggressive play. The Lakers had more fg attempts, so what? The vast majority of those were contested jump shots from 13'+ out. They didn't attack the basket like Boston (Powe in particular) did.Are you this much of an idiot? READ WHAT THE FUCK I SAID. The Lakers took twice as many shots in the paint as Boston. THAT MEANS BOSTON WASN'T MORE AGGRESSIVE!! They were simply allowed to play more aggressive."durrrr...I watched the game and there was no discrepancy in the calls, DURRRRRHHHHH!"OK, you're fuckin stupid. You are still completely missing the point. You as a Laker fan are in no position to bitch about bad calls (whether simply perceived that way or otherwise).
Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 10, 2008, 01:46:16 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 10, 2008, 10:12:21 AMQuote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 08:52:00 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 09, 2008, 06:39:47 PMYea, your stupid point was that Boston was more aggressive...only your dumbass forgot to read the box score. The Lakers took more than twice as many shots in the paint. Boston wasn't more aggressive. Boston was ALLOWED more aggression...That's the whole point.No. You still need basic comprehension skills. My point was that LEON POWE individually got that many FTs because of his aggressive play. The Lakers had more fg attempts, so what? The vast majority of those were contested jump shots from 13'+ out. They didn't attack the basket like Boston (Powe in particular) did.Are you this much of an idiot? READ WHAT THE FUCK I SAID. The Lakers took twice as many shots in the paint as Boston. THAT MEANS BOSTON WASN'T MORE AGGRESSIVE!! They were simply allowed to play more aggressive."durrrr...I watched the game and there was no discrepancy in the calls, DURRRRRHHHHH!"OK, you're fuckin stupid. You are still completely missing the point. You as a Laker fan are in no position to bitch about bad calls (whether simply perceived that way or otherwise).Yes...Yes, I do. You, as a Laker hater, have no business telling Laker fans what they can and can't complain about. Especially when your first statement regarding the game was that you saw no disparity in the officiating. LMAO.
there was absolutely nothing I saw to point to any bias.
^Crazy...I guess the NBA is admitting they know what's up.
^LMAO.Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 12:51:46 AMthere was absolutely nothing I saw to point to any bias."nice try"
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 10, 2008, 10:48:03 PM^LMAO.Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 12:51:46 AMthere was absolutely nothing I saw to point to any bias."nice try"That statement was made under the assumption that you Laker fans don't see how previous Laker titles are undeserved. Again, nice try.
Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 11, 2008, 01:56:38 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 10, 2008, 10:48:03 PM^LMAO.Quote from: Turf Hitta on June 09, 2008, 12:51:46 AMthere was absolutely nothing I saw to point to any bias."nice try"That statement was made under the assumption that you Laker fans don't see how previous Laker titles are undeserved. Again, nice try.LOL...No backtrackin, breezy. You said what you said and many of your statements have been absurd. Now do yourself a favor and shut it.
I watched the same game everybody else did but I didn't see officiating any worse than it usually is.